“It is almost impossible to get a spot when you need it”: Understanding parental knowledge and experiences of Canada’s new child care policy promoting access to quality early childhood education and care

IF 3.2 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Samantha Burns , Esther Yu , Jesseca Perlman , Kashish Kahlon , Michal Perlman
{"title":"“It is almost impossible to get a spot when you need it”: Understanding parental knowledge and experiences of Canada’s new child care policy promoting access to quality early childhood education and care","authors":"Samantha Burns ,&nbsp;Esther Yu ,&nbsp;Jesseca Perlman ,&nbsp;Kashish Kahlon ,&nbsp;Michal Perlman","doi":"10.1016/j.ecresq.2025.05.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Starting in 2021/2022, Canada implemented a new early childhood education and care (ECEC) policy, the Canada-Wide Early Learning and Child Care (CWELCC). CWELCC aims to reduce the cost of child care to an average of $10CA/day. However, prior implementation of similar policies resulted in differential outcomes in terms of benefits received. The current mixed methods study examined 1341 parents’ knowledge and experiences with CWELCC. A total of 72.18 % of parents had heard about CWELCC, with the majority reporting information regarding reduction in cost. Benefits parents reported were largely around cost (41.98 %), while challenges were largely around access to full-time care (41.76 %). The most reported concerns were access and affordability. Concerns regarding affordability were related to increased anxiety (<em>b</em> = 0.40, <em>SE</em> = 0.13), whereas concerns about access and inclusion were related to depression (<em>b</em> = 0.35, SE = 0.16). Binary logistic regressions found differential knowledge and experiences with CWELCC based on family characteristics. For example, older parents and parents with higher income were less likely to have heard about CWELCC (<em>OR</em> = 1.07–1.19, 95 % <em>CI</em> [1.04–1.09, 1.10–1.30]). Employed parents were more likely to experience various benefits (<em>OR</em> = 1.69–2.14, 95 % <em>CI</em> [1.21–1.59, 2.39–2.75]). Differences were also found on knowledge, benefits, challenges, and concerns based on province, population density, and children’s characteristics. Implications for future research and policy are discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48348,"journal":{"name":"Early Childhood Research Quarterly","volume":"73 ","pages":"Pages 69-81"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Childhood Research Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885200625000572","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Starting in 2021/2022, Canada implemented a new early childhood education and care (ECEC) policy, the Canada-Wide Early Learning and Child Care (CWELCC). CWELCC aims to reduce the cost of child care to an average of $10CA/day. However, prior implementation of similar policies resulted in differential outcomes in terms of benefits received. The current mixed methods study examined 1341 parents’ knowledge and experiences with CWELCC. A total of 72.18 % of parents had heard about CWELCC, with the majority reporting information regarding reduction in cost. Benefits parents reported were largely around cost (41.98 %), while challenges were largely around access to full-time care (41.76 %). The most reported concerns were access and affordability. Concerns regarding affordability were related to increased anxiety (b = 0.40, SE = 0.13), whereas concerns about access and inclusion were related to depression (b = 0.35, SE = 0.16). Binary logistic regressions found differential knowledge and experiences with CWELCC based on family characteristics. For example, older parents and parents with higher income were less likely to have heard about CWELCC (OR = 1.07–1.19, 95 % CI [1.04–1.09, 1.10–1.30]). Employed parents were more likely to experience various benefits (OR = 1.69–2.14, 95 % CI [1.21–1.59, 2.39–2.75]). Differences were also found on knowledge, benefits, challenges, and concerns based on province, population density, and children’s characteristics. Implications for future research and policy are discussed.
“当你需要的时候,几乎不可能得到一个位置”:了解加拿大新的儿童保育政策的家长知识和经验,促进获得优质的幼儿教育和护理
从2021/2022年开始,加拿大实施了一项新的早期儿童教育和护理(ECEC)政策,即加拿大范围内的早期学习和儿童护理(CWELCC)。CWELCC的目标是将儿童保育费用降低到平均每天10加元。但是,先前执行的类似政策在获得的惠益方面造成了不同的结果。目前的混合方法研究调查了1341名家长对CWELCC的知识和经验。总共有72.18%的家长听说过CWELCC,其中大多数家长报告了有关降低成本的信息。父母报告的福利主要围绕成本(41.98%),而挑战主要围绕获得全日制护理(41.76%)。据报道,最令人担忧的问题是获得和负担得起。对负担能力的担忧与焦虑增加有关(b = 0.40, SE = 0.13),而对获取和包容的担忧与抑郁有关(b = 0.35, SE = 0.16)。二元逻辑回归发现基于家庭特征的CWELCC知识和经验存在差异。例如,年龄较大的父母和收入较高的父母不太可能听说过CWELCC (OR = 1.07-1.19, 95% CI[1.04-1.09, 1.10-1.30])。有工作的父母更有可能享受到各种福利(OR = 1.69-2.14, 95% CI[1.21-1.59, 2.39-2.75])。根据省份、人口密度和儿童特点,在知识、利益、挑战和关注方面也存在差异。讨论了对未来研究和政策的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
8.10%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: For over twenty years, Early Childhood Research Quarterly (ECRQ) has influenced the field of early childhood education and development through the publication of empirical research that meets the highest standards of scholarly and practical significance. ECRQ publishes predominantly empirical research (quantitative or qualitative methods) on issues of interest to early childhood development, theory, and educational practice (Birth through 8 years of age). The journal also occasionally publishes practitioner and/or policy perspectives, book reviews, and significant reviews of research. As an applied journal, we are interested in work that has social, policy, and educational relevance and implications and work that strengthens links between research and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信