{"title":"Breakthrough Fever in Cardiac Arrest Patients Without the Use of a Cooling Device","authors":"Grigory Ostrovskiy MD , Sarah E. Nelson MD,MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.jemermed.2025.03.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Fever avoidance after cardiac arrest is recommended but cooling devices may not be used even if targeting normothermia.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>We sought to establish the incidence of postarrest fever and association with clinical outcomes depending on whether a cooling device was used.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective study of adult cardiac arrest survivors admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) in our health system in 2021. Our primary outcome was discharged alive. Univariate and multivariable statistics were computed, and additional outcomes included cooling device use, Tmax of ≥38°C within 48 h of admission, and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) ≥8 at discharge.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>364 patients were screened and 194 ultimately analyzed. Seventy-eight (40.2%) were female, median (IQR) age was 63 (54.0–72.8) years old, 96 (49.7%) were provided a cooling device, and 49 (25.3%) reached a temperature ≥38°C within 48 h of admission. Patients without a cooling device more often reached Tmax ≥38°C (37.1% vs. 13.5%, <em>p</em> < 0.001). Greater GCS on day 3 was a consistent independent predictor of being discharged alive and of GCS ≥8 at discharge while failure to use a cooling device was the strongest independent predictor of postarrest fever.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Cooling devices were associated with fever prevention but used in patients who ultimately did poorly. Moreso than use of a cooling device, achieving fever avoidance may be more important for prognosis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16085,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"75 ","pages":"Pages 14-23"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0736467925000885","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Fever avoidance after cardiac arrest is recommended but cooling devices may not be used even if targeting normothermia.
Objectives
We sought to establish the incidence of postarrest fever and association with clinical outcomes depending on whether a cooling device was used.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective study of adult cardiac arrest survivors admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) in our health system in 2021. Our primary outcome was discharged alive. Univariate and multivariable statistics were computed, and additional outcomes included cooling device use, Tmax of ≥38°C within 48 h of admission, and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) ≥8 at discharge.
Results
364 patients were screened and 194 ultimately analyzed. Seventy-eight (40.2%) were female, median (IQR) age was 63 (54.0–72.8) years old, 96 (49.7%) were provided a cooling device, and 49 (25.3%) reached a temperature ≥38°C within 48 h of admission. Patients without a cooling device more often reached Tmax ≥38°C (37.1% vs. 13.5%, p < 0.001). Greater GCS on day 3 was a consistent independent predictor of being discharged alive and of GCS ≥8 at discharge while failure to use a cooling device was the strongest independent predictor of postarrest fever.
Conclusions
Cooling devices were associated with fever prevention but used in patients who ultimately did poorly. Moreso than use of a cooling device, achieving fever avoidance may be more important for prognosis.
背景:建议在心脏骤停后避免发热,但即使针对正常体温也不能使用冷却装置。目的:我们试图确定是否使用冷却装置后的热发生率及其与临床结果的关系。方法:我们对2021年在我国卫生系统入住重症监护病房(icu)的成人心脏骤停幸存者进行了回顾性研究。我们的主要结局是活着出院。计算单变量和多变量统计数据,附加结果包括使用冷却装置,入院48 h内Tmax≥38°C,出院时格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)≥8。结果共筛选364例,最终分析194例。78例(40.2%)为女性,中位(IQR)年龄为63(54.0 ~ 72.8)岁,96例(49.7%)有降温装置,49例(25.3%)在入院48 h内体温≥38℃。未使用降温装置的患者Tmax≥38°C的比例更高(37.1% vs 13.5%, p <;0.001)。第3天较高的GCS是存活出院和出院时GCS≥8的一致独立预测因子,而未使用冷却装置是最强大的独立预测因子。结论冷却装置与预防发热有关,但用于最终表现不佳的患者。因此,与使用冷却装置相比,实现发热避免可能对预后更重要。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Emergency Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed publication featuring original contributions of interest to both the academic and practicing emergency physician. JEM, published monthly, contains research papers and clinical studies as well as articles focusing on the training of emergency physicians and on the practice of emergency medicine. The Journal features the following sections:
• Original Contributions
• Clinical Communications: Pediatric, Adult, OB/GYN
• Selected Topics: Toxicology, Prehospital Care, The Difficult Airway, Aeromedical Emergencies, Disaster Medicine, Cardiology Commentary, Emergency Radiology, Critical Care, Sports Medicine, Wound Care
• Techniques and Procedures
• Technical Tips
• Clinical Laboratory in Emergency Medicine
• Pharmacology in Emergency Medicine
• Case Presentations of the Harvard Emergency Medicine Residency
• Visual Diagnosis in Emergency Medicine
• Medical Classics
• Emergency Forum
• Editorial(s)
• Letters to the Editor
• Education
• Administration of Emergency Medicine
• International Emergency Medicine
• Computers in Emergency Medicine
• Violence: Recognition, Management, and Prevention
• Ethics
• Humanities and Medicine
• American Academy of Emergency Medicine
• AAEM Medical Student Forum
• Book and Other Media Reviews
• Calendar of Events
• Abstracts
• Trauma Reports
• Ultrasound in Emergency Medicine