Collaboration of DNP- and PhD-prepared faculty in an undergraduate nursing research course: Leaning on each other's strengths

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Melissa M. Klamm, Chelsey Andries, Meagan Cherry
{"title":"Collaboration of DNP- and PhD-prepared faculty in an undergraduate nursing research course: Leaning on each other's strengths","authors":"Melissa M. Klamm,&nbsp;Chelsey Andries,&nbsp;Meagan Cherry","doi":"10.1016/j.profnurs.2025.06.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) and Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) pathways offer distinct yet complementary approaches to nursing education and research that, when combined, can advance knowledge of nursing science among undergraduate students. Previous studies on DNP- and PhD-prepared nurse collaborations have focused on graduate students and faculty efforts to address practice needs together. However, there is minimal current literature that discusses this collaboration among undergraduate faculty. The purpose of this article is to present a case study of teaching an undergraduate nursing research course supported by the collaboration of DNP- and PhD-prepared faculty. In a revised undergraduate research course, a PhD-prepared faculty focused on components of quality research, while a DNP-prepared faculty emphasized evidence-based practice (EBP) and clinical guidelines. Interactive teaching methods facilitated student engagement and comprehension. Students reported an increased understanding of research components and the application of EBP principles in nursing practice. By incorporating DNP- and PhD-prepared faculty perspectives, nursing students reported an understanding of research and its relevance to their future practice. This approach offers a model for future curriculum development in undergraduate nursing programs by incorporating DNP- and PhD-prepared faculty perspectives.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Professional Nursing","volume":"60 ","pages":"Pages 28-31"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Professional Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S8755722325000997","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) and Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) pathways offer distinct yet complementary approaches to nursing education and research that, when combined, can advance knowledge of nursing science among undergraduate students. Previous studies on DNP- and PhD-prepared nurse collaborations have focused on graduate students and faculty efforts to address practice needs together. However, there is minimal current literature that discusses this collaboration among undergraduate faculty. The purpose of this article is to present a case study of teaching an undergraduate nursing research course supported by the collaboration of DNP- and PhD-prepared faculty. In a revised undergraduate research course, a PhD-prepared faculty focused on components of quality research, while a DNP-prepared faculty emphasized evidence-based practice (EBP) and clinical guidelines. Interactive teaching methods facilitated student engagement and comprehension. Students reported an increased understanding of research components and the application of EBP principles in nursing practice. By incorporating DNP- and PhD-prepared faculty perspectives, nursing students reported an understanding of research and its relevance to their future practice. This approach offers a model for future curriculum development in undergraduate nursing programs by incorporating DNP- and PhD-prepared faculty perspectives.
在本科护理研究课程中,DNP和博士准备教师的合作:相互学习优势
哲学博士(PhD)和护理实践博士(DNP)的途径为护理教育和研究提供了不同但互补的方法,当它们结合在一起时,可以提高本科生的护理科学知识。以前关于DNP和博士护士合作的研究主要集中在研究生和教师共同解决实践需求的努力上。然而,目前很少有文献讨论本科教师之间的这种合作。本文的目的是提出一个案例研究的教学本科护理研究课程的支持下,DNP和博士准备教师的合作。在修订后的本科研究课程中,准备博士学位的教师专注于质量研究的组成部分,而准备dnp的教师则强调循证实践(EBP)和临床指南。互动式教学方法促进了学生的参与和理解。学生报告对研究内容和EBP原则在护理实践中的应用的理解有所增加。通过结合DNP和博士准备的教师观点,护理学生报告了对研究的理解及其与他们未来实践的相关性。这种方法通过结合DNP和博士准备的教师观点,为本科护理课程的未来课程开发提供了一种模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.00%
发文量
153
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The Journal will accept articles that focus on baccalaureate and higher degree nursing education, educational research, policy related to education, and education and practice partnerships. Reports of original work, research, reviews, insightful descriptions, and policy papers focusing on baccalaureate and graduate nursing education will be published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信