A study of adaptive population sizing in a self-adaptive differential evolution

Q3 Mathematics
Haldi Budiman , Shir Li Wang , Theam Foo Ng , Amr S. Ghoneim , Haidi Ibrahim , Bahbibi Rahmatullah
{"title":"A study of adaptive population sizing in a self-adaptive differential evolution","authors":"Haldi Budiman ,&nbsp;Shir Li Wang ,&nbsp;Theam Foo Ng ,&nbsp;Amr S. Ghoneim ,&nbsp;Haidi Ibrahim ,&nbsp;Bahbibi Rahmatullah","doi":"10.1016/j.rico.2025.100585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Differential Evolution (DE) is extensively applied due to its simplicity, robustness, and computational efficiency. However, the performance of DE is influenced by several factors, including the nature of the problem, the specific algorithm variant, and user-defined settings. Numerous studies have explored adaptive parameter settings to reduce the sensitivity of DE’s performance to user inputs, parameter choices, and problem characteristics. DE’s ability to find optimal solutions depends on offspring generation and population diversity. One of the ways to improve DE’s population diversity is by adjusting the population size, either by introducing new individuals or eliminating existing ones. This work investigates the adaptation of population sizing of a self-adaptive differential evolution algorithm called Self-Adaptive Ensemble-based DE with Enhanced Population Sizing (SAEDE-EP). The adaptation of population sizing in SAEDE-EP is influenced by two parameters: the threshold value for stagnation comparison of the best individual over generations and the population size’s growth rate. The effect of these two parameters on population sizing adaptation is evaluated using 26 benchmark single-objective unconstrained optimization functions consisting of unimodal, multimodal, hybrid, and composition functions. SAEDE-EP is compared against 18 state-of-the-art evolutionary algorithms on 10 functions from the 100-Digit Challenge on CEC 2019 single-objective real parameter optimization. Additionally, SAEDE-EP is tested on 57 problems from the CEC-2020 Competitions on Real-World Single Objective Constrained Optimization. Comparative analysis indicates that SAEDE-EP performs well in single-objective unconstrained optimization problems with various characteristics and solves 86% of the real-world single-objective constrained optimization, requiring less computational time and less exhaustive effort to set parameters.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34733,"journal":{"name":"Results in Control and Optimization","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 100585"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Results in Control and Optimization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666720725000712","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Differential Evolution (DE) is extensively applied due to its simplicity, robustness, and computational efficiency. However, the performance of DE is influenced by several factors, including the nature of the problem, the specific algorithm variant, and user-defined settings. Numerous studies have explored adaptive parameter settings to reduce the sensitivity of DE’s performance to user inputs, parameter choices, and problem characteristics. DE’s ability to find optimal solutions depends on offspring generation and population diversity. One of the ways to improve DE’s population diversity is by adjusting the population size, either by introducing new individuals or eliminating existing ones. This work investigates the adaptation of population sizing of a self-adaptive differential evolution algorithm called Self-Adaptive Ensemble-based DE with Enhanced Population Sizing (SAEDE-EP). The adaptation of population sizing in SAEDE-EP is influenced by two parameters: the threshold value for stagnation comparison of the best individual over generations and the population size’s growth rate. The effect of these two parameters on population sizing adaptation is evaluated using 26 benchmark single-objective unconstrained optimization functions consisting of unimodal, multimodal, hybrid, and composition functions. SAEDE-EP is compared against 18 state-of-the-art evolutionary algorithms on 10 functions from the 100-Digit Challenge on CEC 2019 single-objective real parameter optimization. Additionally, SAEDE-EP is tested on 57 problems from the CEC-2020 Competitions on Real-World Single Objective Constrained Optimization. Comparative analysis indicates that SAEDE-EP performs well in single-objective unconstrained optimization problems with various characteristics and solves 86% of the real-world single-objective constrained optimization, requiring less computational time and less exhaustive effort to set parameters.
自适应差异进化中适应性种群规模的研究
差分进化算法以其简单、鲁棒性好、计算效率高等优点得到了广泛的应用。但是,DE的性能受到几个因素的影响,包括问题的性质、特定的算法变体和用户定义的设置。许多研究探索了自适应参数设置,以降低DE的性能对用户输入、参数选择和问题特征的敏感性。DE找到最优解的能力取决于后代的数量和种群的多样性。改善DE种群多样性的方法之一是通过引入新个体或消除现有个体来调整种群规模。本文研究了一种自适应差分进化算法的种群规模适应性,该算法称为基于自适应集成的增强种群规模DE (SAEDE-EP)。SAEDE-EP对种群规模的适应受两个参数的影响:最优个体的代际停滞比较阈值和种群规模增长率。利用单峰、多峰、混合和组合函数组成的26个基准单目标无约束优化函数,评估了这两个参数对种群规模适应性的影响。将SAEDE-EP与18种最先进的进化算法在CEC 2019单目标实参数优化100位挑战中的10个函数上进行比较。此外,SAEDE-EP还对来自CEC-2020世界单目标约束优化竞赛的57个问题进行了测试。对比分析表明,SAEDE-EP在各种特征的单目标无约束优化问题中表现良好,解决了86%的现实世界单目标约束优化问题,计算时间更少,参数设置的穷举性更小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Results in Control and Optimization
Results in Control and Optimization Mathematics-Control and Optimization
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
91 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信