Selecting the most suitable propeller systems for cargo vessels operating at speeds above 10 knots by using intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS approach

IF 2.4 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Dursun Saral , Yunus Emre Nazligul , Devran Yazir
{"title":"Selecting the most suitable propeller systems for cargo vessels operating at speeds above 10 knots by using intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS approach","authors":"Dursun Saral ,&nbsp;Yunus Emre Nazligul ,&nbsp;Devran Yazir","doi":"10.1016/j.rsma.2025.104303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Propeller technology has radically transformed ship mobility since the 19th century. The evolution of modern propellers began with the discovery of steam power and has led to complex engineering solutions that enhance the efficiency of maritime transport. The choice of propeller has a critical impact on a ship's performance. This paper aims to determine the most suitable propeller systems for vessels such as tankers, dry cargo vessels, chemical tankers, container vessel operating at speeds above 10 knots. The types of propellers analyzed include fixed pitch propellers, controllable pitch propellers, ducted propellers, Grim Vane wheels, propeller-stator systems, and Z-Drive units. Every propeller system is assessed according to a number of parameters such as high thrust power, high maneuverability, initial investment cost, maintenance and repair costs, construction ease or difficulty, operational or usage ease or difficulty, breakdown risk during the voyage, and an increase in total propulsion efficiency. The selection process utilizes the intuitive fuzzy TOPSIS method, which ranks alternatives based on their similarity to an ideal solution. The IF-TOPSIS method was applied to determine the most suitable propeller types among six alternatives. The closeness scores were as follows: Fixed Pitch Propeller (0.120), Controllable Pitch Propeller (−0.028), Z-Drive Units (−0.073), Propeller Stator System (−0.080), Ducted Propeller (−0.085), and Grim Vane Wheel (−0.162). These scores indicate that the Fixed Pitch Propeller significantly outperformed the others in terms of operational efficiency and reliability, while the Grim Vane Wheel consistently ranked the lowest under off-design conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21070,"journal":{"name":"Regional Studies in Marine Science","volume":"89 ","pages":"Article 104303"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Studies in Marine Science","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352485525002944","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Propeller technology has radically transformed ship mobility since the 19th century. The evolution of modern propellers began with the discovery of steam power and has led to complex engineering solutions that enhance the efficiency of maritime transport. The choice of propeller has a critical impact on a ship's performance. This paper aims to determine the most suitable propeller systems for vessels such as tankers, dry cargo vessels, chemical tankers, container vessel operating at speeds above 10 knots. The types of propellers analyzed include fixed pitch propellers, controllable pitch propellers, ducted propellers, Grim Vane wheels, propeller-stator systems, and Z-Drive units. Every propeller system is assessed according to a number of parameters such as high thrust power, high maneuverability, initial investment cost, maintenance and repair costs, construction ease or difficulty, operational or usage ease or difficulty, breakdown risk during the voyage, and an increase in total propulsion efficiency. The selection process utilizes the intuitive fuzzy TOPSIS method, which ranks alternatives based on their similarity to an ideal solution. The IF-TOPSIS method was applied to determine the most suitable propeller types among six alternatives. The closeness scores were as follows: Fixed Pitch Propeller (0.120), Controllable Pitch Propeller (−0.028), Z-Drive Units (−0.073), Propeller Stator System (−0.080), Ducted Propeller (−0.085), and Grim Vane Wheel (−0.162). These scores indicate that the Fixed Pitch Propeller significantly outperformed the others in terms of operational efficiency and reliability, while the Grim Vane Wheel consistently ranked the lowest under off-design conditions.
采用直觉模糊TOPSIS方法对航速在10节以上的货船进行螺旋桨系统选择
自19世纪以来,螺旋桨技术从根本上改变了船舶的机动性。现代螺旋桨的发展始于蒸汽动力的发现,并导致了提高海上运输效率的复杂工程解决方案。螺旋桨的选择对船舶的性能有至关重要的影响。本文旨在确定最适合船舶的螺旋桨系统,如油轮,干货船,化学品船,集装箱船在10节以上的速度运行。所分析的螺旋桨类型包括固定螺距螺旋桨、可调螺距螺旋桨、导管式螺旋桨、格林叶轮、螺旋桨-定子系统和Z-Drive单元。每个螺旋桨系统都是根据一些参数进行评估的,如高推力、高机动性、初始投资成本、维护和修理成本、建造的难易程度、操作或使用的难易程度、航行中的故障风险以及总推进效率的增加。选择过程采用直观的模糊TOPSIS方法,根据与理想解决方案的相似性对备选方案进行排名。应用IF-TOPSIS方法在6种备选方案中确定最合适的螺旋桨类型。接近分数如下:固定螺距螺旋桨(0.120),可调螺距螺旋桨(- 0.028),z -驱动单元(- 0.073),螺旋桨定子系统(- 0.080),导管螺旋桨(- 0.085)和叶轮(- 0.162)。这些分数表明,固定螺距螺旋桨在运行效率和可靠性方面明显优于其他螺旋桨,而在非设计条件下,格雷米叶轮一直排名最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Regional Studies in Marine Science
Regional Studies in Marine Science Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
336
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: REGIONAL STUDIES IN MARINE SCIENCE will publish scientifically sound papers on regional aspects of maritime and marine resources in estuaries, coastal zones, continental shelf, the seas and oceans.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信