The risk-benefit ratio of anticonvulsant drugs.

M J Eadie
{"title":"The risk-benefit ratio of anticonvulsant drugs.","authors":"M J Eadie","doi":"10.1007/BF03259952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The concepts underlying the notion of a risk-benefit ratio for anticonvulsant therapy have determined the development of the drug treatment of epilepsy over many years. The risk element in the ratio arises from the various possible physical and psychological adverse effects of anticonvulsant therapy; the benefit is derived from the capacity of therapy to prevent seizures and thus reduce the disadvantages which result from having epilepsy. The physical adverse effects of anticonvulsant therapy may involve many tissues and organs. The drugs tend to depress cerebral, cerebellar and brain stem function, and may slow peripheral nerve conduction. Prolonged intake may cause hypocalcaemia and osteoporosis, folate depletion, various haematological and immunological abnormalities, and overgrowth of subcutaneous and gingival tissues. Idiopathic reactions may involve the skin, lymph nodes, liver, pancreas, kidney and thyroid, and cause electrolyte disturbances, while maternal anticonvulsant intake during pregnancy may be associated with an increased incidence of fetal malformations. Local reactions may occur at drug administration sites, and anticonvulsants may interact pharmacokinetically and pharmacodynamically with co-administered drugs. The taking of anticonvulsants sometimes has undesirable psychological effects on both the patient and his or her family. Epilepsy itself often results in adverse psychological consequences which emanate from the uncertainty and insecurity that is imposed by the unpredictable occurrence of seizures, from the limitations epilepsy sets on the patient's lifestyle and employment prospects, and from unfavourable community attitudes towards the disorder. Contemporary anticonvulsant therapy is not fully effective in all patients, but to the extent that it can control seizures it may help alleviate these emotional burdens that are a result of epilepsy. The consensus of present day medical opinion is that, in the great majority of clinical situations, the benefits of anticonvulsant therapy outweigh the disadvantages. However, to provide optimal management for individual patients, the risk-benefit ratio of therapy must be repeatedly assessed at all stages of a patient's treatment, and therapeutic decisions taken in the light of the ratio as it applies to the individual.</p>","PeriodicalId":77748,"journal":{"name":"Medical toxicology and adverse drug experience","volume":"2 5","pages":"324-37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF03259952","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical toxicology and adverse drug experience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03259952","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The concepts underlying the notion of a risk-benefit ratio for anticonvulsant therapy have determined the development of the drug treatment of epilepsy over many years. The risk element in the ratio arises from the various possible physical and psychological adverse effects of anticonvulsant therapy; the benefit is derived from the capacity of therapy to prevent seizures and thus reduce the disadvantages which result from having epilepsy. The physical adverse effects of anticonvulsant therapy may involve many tissues and organs. The drugs tend to depress cerebral, cerebellar and brain stem function, and may slow peripheral nerve conduction. Prolonged intake may cause hypocalcaemia and osteoporosis, folate depletion, various haematological and immunological abnormalities, and overgrowth of subcutaneous and gingival tissues. Idiopathic reactions may involve the skin, lymph nodes, liver, pancreas, kidney and thyroid, and cause electrolyte disturbances, while maternal anticonvulsant intake during pregnancy may be associated with an increased incidence of fetal malformations. Local reactions may occur at drug administration sites, and anticonvulsants may interact pharmacokinetically and pharmacodynamically with co-administered drugs. The taking of anticonvulsants sometimes has undesirable psychological effects on both the patient and his or her family. Epilepsy itself often results in adverse psychological consequences which emanate from the uncertainty and insecurity that is imposed by the unpredictable occurrence of seizures, from the limitations epilepsy sets on the patient's lifestyle and employment prospects, and from unfavourable community attitudes towards the disorder. Contemporary anticonvulsant therapy is not fully effective in all patients, but to the extent that it can control seizures it may help alleviate these emotional burdens that are a result of epilepsy. The consensus of present day medical opinion is that, in the great majority of clinical situations, the benefits of anticonvulsant therapy outweigh the disadvantages. However, to provide optimal management for individual patients, the risk-benefit ratio of therapy must be repeatedly assessed at all stages of a patient's treatment, and therapeutic decisions taken in the light of the ratio as it applies to the individual.

抗惊厥药物的风险-收益比。
抗惊厥药物治疗风险-收益比的概念决定了多年来癫痫药物治疗的发展。比率中的风险因素来自抗惊厥治疗的各种可能的生理和心理不良反应;这种益处来自于治疗预防癫痫发作的能力,从而减少了癫痫造成的不利影响。抗惊厥治疗的生理不良反应可能涉及许多组织和器官。这些药物容易抑制大脑、小脑和脑干功能,并可能减慢周围神经传导。长期摄入可引起低钙血症和骨质疏松症、叶酸缺乏、各种血液学和免疫学异常以及皮下和牙龈组织过度生长。特发性反应可能涉及皮肤、淋巴结、肝脏、胰腺、肾脏和甲状腺,并引起电解质紊乱,而孕妇在怀孕期间服用抗惊厥药可能与胎儿畸形发生率增加有关。局部反应可能发生在给药部位,抗惊厥药可能与联合给药的药物在药代动力学和药效学上相互作用。服用抗惊厥药有时会对患者及其家人产生不良的心理影响。癫痫本身往往会造成不良的心理后果,其原因是癫痫发作的不可预测性所带来的不确定性和不安全感,癫痫对患者的生活方式和就业前景造成的限制,以及社区对这种疾病的不利态度。当代抗惊厥药物治疗并非对所有患者都完全有效,但在一定程度上,它可以控制癫痫发作,可能有助于减轻癫痫引起的情绪负担。当今医学观点的共识是,在绝大多数临床情况下,抗惊厥药物治疗的好处大于坏处。然而,为了为个体患者提供最佳管理,必须在患者治疗的所有阶段反复评估治疗的风险-收益比,并根据适用于个体的比例做出治疗决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信