A 6-month, double-blind study comparing nabumetone to naproxen in the treatment of osteoarthritis.

Pharmatherapeutica Pub Date : 1987-01-01
E J Pisko, K Strader, D Rice, R White, L A Goodman
{"title":"A 6-month, double-blind study comparing nabumetone to naproxen in the treatment of osteoarthritis.","authors":"E J Pisko,&nbsp;K Strader,&nbsp;D Rice,&nbsp;R White,&nbsp;L A Goodman","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A 6-month, double-blind, controlled, randomized, parallel study was performed to compare the efficacy and tolerance of nabumetone (1000 mg at bedtime) with naproxen (250 mg twice daily) in the treatment of osteoarthritis. Five efficacy parameters were evaluated: patient's assessment of overall osteoarthritis activity and pain, physician's assessment of overall osteoarthritis activity and pain, and physician's assessment of pain with respect to a defined activity. All 40 patients entered (20 in each group) were available for evaluation of tolerance and 36 patients for efficacy analysis (18 in each group). The efficacy results revealed significant improvement in all five parameters for each medication except measurement of pain with respect to a defined activity for naproxen (p less than 0.07). The frequency of possible or probable drug-related adverse experiences was high for both drugs. However, only 1 patient left the study because of a probable drug-related adverse experience (abdominal pain in a nabumetone patient). Six nabumetone and 4 naproxen patients dropped out of the study because of lack of efficacy. The results indicate that nabumetone and naproxen have comparable efficacy and tolerance at the dosage used, and suggest that a single night-time dosage of nabumetone may be a convenient and useful treatment for osteoarthritis.</p>","PeriodicalId":19862,"journal":{"name":"Pharmatherapeutica","volume":"5 2","pages":"90-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmatherapeutica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A 6-month, double-blind, controlled, randomized, parallel study was performed to compare the efficacy and tolerance of nabumetone (1000 mg at bedtime) with naproxen (250 mg twice daily) in the treatment of osteoarthritis. Five efficacy parameters were evaluated: patient's assessment of overall osteoarthritis activity and pain, physician's assessment of overall osteoarthritis activity and pain, and physician's assessment of pain with respect to a defined activity. All 40 patients entered (20 in each group) were available for evaluation of tolerance and 36 patients for efficacy analysis (18 in each group). The efficacy results revealed significant improvement in all five parameters for each medication except measurement of pain with respect to a defined activity for naproxen (p less than 0.07). The frequency of possible or probable drug-related adverse experiences was high for both drugs. However, only 1 patient left the study because of a probable drug-related adverse experience (abdominal pain in a nabumetone patient). Six nabumetone and 4 naproxen patients dropped out of the study because of lack of efficacy. The results indicate that nabumetone and naproxen have comparable efficacy and tolerance at the dosage used, and suggest that a single night-time dosage of nabumetone may be a convenient and useful treatment for osteoarthritis.

一项为期6个月的双盲研究,比较纳布美酮和萘普生治疗骨关节炎的疗效。
进行了一项为期6个月的双盲、对照、随机、平行研究,比较纳布美酮(睡前1000 mg)与萘普生(250 mg,每日2次)治疗骨关节炎的疗效和耐受性。评估了五个疗效参数:患者对整体骨关节炎活动和疼痛的评估,医生对整体骨关节炎活动和疼痛的评估,以及医生对定义活动的疼痛评估。所有入选的40例患者(每组20例)可用于耐受性评估,36例患者可用于疗效分析(每组18例)。疗效结果显示,除了疼痛测量与萘普生的定义活性相关外,每种药物的所有五个参数都有显著改善(p < 0.07)。两种药物可能或可能的药物相关不良经历的频率都很高。然而,只有1名患者因为可能与药物相关的不良经历(纳布美酮患者腹痛)而退出研究。6例纳布美酮和4例萘普生患者因缺乏疗效而退出研究。结果表明,纳布美酮和萘普生在使用剂量上具有相当的疗效和耐受性,提示单次夜间服用纳布美酮可能是治疗骨关节炎的一种方便有效的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信