Piotr Makar, Grzegorz Bielec, Dariusz Skalski, Damian Kowalski, Alicja Pęczak-Graczyk, Igor Grygus, Aleksandra Kisilewicz
{"title":"Changes in swimming technique and physical performance after 8 weeks of lifeguard rescue training: an exploratory study.","authors":"Piotr Makar, Grzegorz Bielec, Dariusz Skalski, Damian Kowalski, Alicja Pęczak-Graczyk, Igor Grygus, Aleksandra Kisilewicz","doi":"10.37190/abb-02531-2024-03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Purpose</i>: Every lifeguard undergoes numerous tests that aim to check, among others, strength, speed, resistance etc., which is finally verified by a rescue action without equipment. The level of mastering elements of the swimming technique and swimming kinematics is a key element to succeed in swiftly reaching the drowning person which is limited by the time needed for drowning. The aim of this study was two-fold: (i) to analyze the variations of swimming kinematics after 8-weeks of lifeguard training, and (ii) to analyze the relationships between changes in kinematic outcomes and swimming performance over 25 and 100 meters. <i>Methods</i>: Six lifeguard candidates (age: 21.0 ± 1.09 years old; three female and three male students) voluntarily participated in this study. The 4 × 25-m freestyle test and a 100-m freestyle tests were performed twice (before and after 8-week training period). The tests were video-recorded and the following kinematic variables were calculated: swimming velocity, stroke frequency, stroke length and stroke index. <i>Results</i>: No significant changes in kinematic variables were observed. However, a strong correlation (<i>r</i> = 0.83) occurred between the swimming velocity of the 4 × 25 m test and the finish velocity of the 100 m test. The stroke index of the 4 × 25 m test was strongly correlated with the swimming velocity of the 100 m test (<i>r</i> = 0.89). <i>Conclusions</i>: Although lifeguard training did not improve swimming kinematics, it is worthwhile using training methods to check the preparation level of a lifeguard to ensure that he/she is properly trained to help people drowning in water bodies.</p>","PeriodicalId":519996,"journal":{"name":"Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics","volume":"27 1","pages":"111-118"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37190/abb-02531-2024-03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Every lifeguard undergoes numerous tests that aim to check, among others, strength, speed, resistance etc., which is finally verified by a rescue action without equipment. The level of mastering elements of the swimming technique and swimming kinematics is a key element to succeed in swiftly reaching the drowning person which is limited by the time needed for drowning. The aim of this study was two-fold: (i) to analyze the variations of swimming kinematics after 8-weeks of lifeguard training, and (ii) to analyze the relationships between changes in kinematic outcomes and swimming performance over 25 and 100 meters. Methods: Six lifeguard candidates (age: 21.0 ± 1.09 years old; three female and three male students) voluntarily participated in this study. The 4 × 25-m freestyle test and a 100-m freestyle tests were performed twice (before and after 8-week training period). The tests were video-recorded and the following kinematic variables were calculated: swimming velocity, stroke frequency, stroke length and stroke index. Results: No significant changes in kinematic variables were observed. However, a strong correlation (r = 0.83) occurred between the swimming velocity of the 4 × 25 m test and the finish velocity of the 100 m test. The stroke index of the 4 × 25 m test was strongly correlated with the swimming velocity of the 100 m test (r = 0.89). Conclusions: Although lifeguard training did not improve swimming kinematics, it is worthwhile using training methods to check the preparation level of a lifeguard to ensure that he/she is properly trained to help people drowning in water bodies.