Balancing challenges: exploring postural stability in osteogenesis imperfecta.

Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics Pub Date : 2025-06-16 Print Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.37190/abb-02610-2025-02
Krzysztof Graff, Katarzyna Kaczmarczyk, Małgorzata Syczewska
{"title":"Balancing challenges: exploring postural stability in osteogenesis imperfecta.","authors":"Krzysztof Graff, Katarzyna Kaczmarczyk, Małgorzata Syczewska","doi":"10.37190/abb-02610-2025-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Purpose</i>: Abnormalities in bone structure impact motor functions, including the ability to maintain stable posture. This study assessed static and dynamic balance in patients with osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) across different disease types, compared to a healthy population. <i>Methods</i>: The study group included 87 patients with OI: Type I (<i>n</i> = 45), Type III (<i>n</i> = 28), and Type IV (<i>n</i> = 14). Balance was assessed using the AMTI (Advanced Mechanical Technology, Inc.) platform. Measurements in standing (ST) position during anterior-posterior (AP) and medial-lateral (ML) tilts, with eyes open, for 30 seconds. <i>Results</i>: Significant differences in balance parameters under static conditions were found between OI types (61.5% between Types I and III, 38.5% between Types I and IV, and 30.7% between Types III and IV). Across all OI types, maintaining balance predominantly involved displacement of the COP (Centre of Pressure) in the sagittal plane, observed in 84.7% of Type II OI, 75.2% of Type III OI and 74.5% of Type IV OI cases. Under dynamic conditions, significant differences in balance parameters were noted in 84.6% of comparisons between Types I and III, 46.1% between Types I and IV, and 69.2% between Types III and IV. <i>Conclusions</i>: Balance assessment in individuals with OI is essential for injury prevention, improving mobility and daily function, and monitoring therapy effectiveness. Development of more preventive strategies aimed at reducing fracture risk and enhancing the quality of life for these patients. The relatively small number of patients with type III and the wide age range represent limitations of our study.</p>","PeriodicalId":519996,"journal":{"name":"Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics","volume":"27 1","pages":"181-190"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37190/abb-02610-2025-02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Abnormalities in bone structure impact motor functions, including the ability to maintain stable posture. This study assessed static and dynamic balance in patients with osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) across different disease types, compared to a healthy population. Methods: The study group included 87 patients with OI: Type I (n = 45), Type III (n = 28), and Type IV (n = 14). Balance was assessed using the AMTI (Advanced Mechanical Technology, Inc.) platform. Measurements in standing (ST) position during anterior-posterior (AP) and medial-lateral (ML) tilts, with eyes open, for 30 seconds. Results: Significant differences in balance parameters under static conditions were found between OI types (61.5% between Types I and III, 38.5% between Types I and IV, and 30.7% between Types III and IV). Across all OI types, maintaining balance predominantly involved displacement of the COP (Centre of Pressure) in the sagittal plane, observed in 84.7% of Type II OI, 75.2% of Type III OI and 74.5% of Type IV OI cases. Under dynamic conditions, significant differences in balance parameters were noted in 84.6% of comparisons between Types I and III, 46.1% between Types I and IV, and 69.2% between Types III and IV. Conclusions: Balance assessment in individuals with OI is essential for injury prevention, improving mobility and daily function, and monitoring therapy effectiveness. Development of more preventive strategies aimed at reducing fracture risk and enhancing the quality of life for these patients. The relatively small number of patients with type III and the wide age range represent limitations of our study.

平衡挑战:探索成骨不全症的姿势稳定性。
目的:骨结构异常影响运动功能,包括保持稳定姿势的能力。本研究评估了不同疾病类型成骨不全(OI)患者的静态和动态平衡,并与健康人群进行了比较。方法:研究组纳入87例成骨不全患者:I型(n = 45)、III型(n = 28)、IV型(n = 14)。使用AMTI (Advanced Mechanical Technology, Inc.)平台评估平衡。前后倾斜(AP)和中外侧倾斜(ML)时站立(ST)位测量,眼睛睁开,持续30秒。结果:不同成骨不全类型静态状态下平衡参数差异显著(I型与III型61.5%,I型与IV型38.5%,III型与IV型30.7%)。在所有OI类型中,维持平衡主要涉及矢状面COP(压力中心)的移位,在84.7%的II型OI, 75.2%的III型OI和74.5%的IV型OI病例中观察到。在动态条件下,84.6%的I型和III型患者在平衡参数上存在显著差异,46.1%的I型和IV型患者在平衡参数上存在显著差异,69.2%的III型和IV型患者在平衡参数上存在显著差异。结论:对成骨不全患者进行平衡评估对于预防损伤、改善活动能力和日常功能以及监测治疗效果至关重要。制定更多的预防策略,旨在降低骨折风险,提高这些患者的生活质量。相对较少的III型患者和广泛的年龄范围代表了我们研究的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信