Brunella Zizolfi, Virginia Foreste, Maria Giuseppina Trinchillo, Danilo Borrelli, Alessandra Gallo, Maria Chiara De Angelis, Fabiola Nardelli, Attilio Di Spiezio Sardo
{"title":"The impact of virtual reality technology in the era of See & Treat hysteroscopy: a randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Brunella Zizolfi, Virginia Foreste, Maria Giuseppina Trinchillo, Danilo Borrelli, Alessandra Gallo, Maria Chiara De Angelis, Fabiola Nardelli, Attilio Di Spiezio Sardo","doi":"10.52054/FVVO.2025.48","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the context of outpatient hysteroscopy (OPH), performing a single procedure integrating the operative and diagnostic part is known as \"See & Treat hysteroscopy\". The virtual reality (VR) technology provides an immersive virtual environment that can provide a non-invasive analgesic. To date, there is limited evidence regarding its use in the OPH setting.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of VR technology for pain and anxiety management in OPH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Unblinded, prospective, randomised controlled trial, conducted at the Hysteroscopy Unit of the University of Naples \"Federico II\" between May and July 2024. Women aged 18-70 years, indicated for OPH, were randomised into a control group (standard OPH care) and an intervention group (OPH care with the addition of a VR headset).</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Pain and anxiety were assessed through subjective measures: numerical rating scale (NRS) scores before and after the procedure, and objective measures: heart and respiratory rate pre- and during the procedure. Satisfaction, time, and success rates were also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 116 women were enrolled. The VR group compared to the control group reported significantly lower mean standard deviation NRS scores for pain [3.9 (2.7) vs. 5.4 (3.0); mean difference 1.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.4 to 2.5] and anxiety [3.2 (2.1) vs. 4.8 (2.8); mean difference 1.6, 95% CI 0.7 to 2.5] respectively. Regarding satisfaction, 96.5% of the VR group would use the headset again, whereas 3.5% requested its removal. All women in the control group desired a distraction. No serious adverse events were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>VR technology proved feasible and effective for pain and anxiety management in OPH, particularly during operative procedures.</p><p><strong>What is new?: </strong>Its use can support the implementation of the See & Treat philosophy.</p>","PeriodicalId":46400,"journal":{"name":"Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52054/FVVO.2025.48","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: In the context of outpatient hysteroscopy (OPH), performing a single procedure integrating the operative and diagnostic part is known as "See & Treat hysteroscopy". The virtual reality (VR) technology provides an immersive virtual environment that can provide a non-invasive analgesic. To date, there is limited evidence regarding its use in the OPH setting.
Objectives: To evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of VR technology for pain and anxiety management in OPH.
Methods: Unblinded, prospective, randomised controlled trial, conducted at the Hysteroscopy Unit of the University of Naples "Federico II" between May and July 2024. Women aged 18-70 years, indicated for OPH, were randomised into a control group (standard OPH care) and an intervention group (OPH care with the addition of a VR headset).
Main outcome measures: Pain and anxiety were assessed through subjective measures: numerical rating scale (NRS) scores before and after the procedure, and objective measures: heart and respiratory rate pre- and during the procedure. Satisfaction, time, and success rates were also evaluated.
Results: Overall, 116 women were enrolled. The VR group compared to the control group reported significantly lower mean standard deviation NRS scores for pain [3.9 (2.7) vs. 5.4 (3.0); mean difference 1.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.4 to 2.5] and anxiety [3.2 (2.1) vs. 4.8 (2.8); mean difference 1.6, 95% CI 0.7 to 2.5] respectively. Regarding satisfaction, 96.5% of the VR group would use the headset again, whereas 3.5% requested its removal. All women in the control group desired a distraction. No serious adverse events were reported.
Conclusions: VR technology proved feasible and effective for pain and anxiety management in OPH, particularly during operative procedures.
What is new?: Its use can support the implementation of the See & Treat philosophy.