Resilience Among Healthcare Staff: A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Digital Training Program.

IF 1.6 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Lotte Bock, Lara Westemeyer, Nadine Moschner, Majeed Rana, Madiha Rana
{"title":"Resilience Among Healthcare Staff: A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Digital Training Program.","authors":"Lotte Bock, Lara Westemeyer, Nadine Moschner, Majeed Rana, Madiha Rana","doi":"10.1007/s10880-025-10085-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nursing and direct care staff face significant psychological and physical challenges, including high workloads, emotional labour, and staff shortages, which increase the risk of burnout and stress-related conditions. Resilience is a protective factor that mitigates these effects. This study evaluated the efficacy of a 28-day digital resilience training programme tailored to the needs of nursing and direct care staff. One hundred twenty participants working in German healthcare settings were randomly assigned to an experimental group or a waitlist control group. Experimental group participants received a programme consisting of twice-daily video-based exercises, reflections, and relaxation activities over four weeks. Outcomes were assessed at baseline (T1), post-intervention (T2), and three months follow-up (T3). Resilience (primary outcome) was measured using the Resilience Scale, and perceived stress (secondary outcome) was measured using the Perceived Stress Questionnaire (PSQ). Compared to the control group, experimental group participants demonstrated significant improvements in resilience from T1 to T3 (p < .001, d = 0.6) and substantial reductions in percieved stress (PSQ total score, p < .001, d = - 1.4). No significant changes were observed in the control group. The digital programme effectively enhanced resilience and reduced the perception of stress, aligning with prior research on resilience training in healthcare. Despite stress reduction showing a larger effect size, resilience remained the theoretically grounded primary outcome. The flexible, scalable design of the digital programme accommodates challenges like shift work, offering a practical solution for improving nurse staff's mental health. Clinical Trial Registration: German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS), Identifier: DRKS00030973.</p>","PeriodicalId":15494,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10880-025-10085-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nursing and direct care staff face significant psychological and physical challenges, including high workloads, emotional labour, and staff shortages, which increase the risk of burnout and stress-related conditions. Resilience is a protective factor that mitigates these effects. This study evaluated the efficacy of a 28-day digital resilience training programme tailored to the needs of nursing and direct care staff. One hundred twenty participants working in German healthcare settings were randomly assigned to an experimental group or a waitlist control group. Experimental group participants received a programme consisting of twice-daily video-based exercises, reflections, and relaxation activities over four weeks. Outcomes were assessed at baseline (T1), post-intervention (T2), and three months follow-up (T3). Resilience (primary outcome) was measured using the Resilience Scale, and perceived stress (secondary outcome) was measured using the Perceived Stress Questionnaire (PSQ). Compared to the control group, experimental group participants demonstrated significant improvements in resilience from T1 to T3 (p < .001, d = 0.6) and substantial reductions in percieved stress (PSQ total score, p < .001, d = - 1.4). No significant changes were observed in the control group. The digital programme effectively enhanced resilience and reduced the perception of stress, aligning with prior research on resilience training in healthcare. Despite stress reduction showing a larger effect size, resilience remained the theoretically grounded primary outcome. The flexible, scalable design of the digital programme accommodates challenges like shift work, offering a practical solution for improving nurse staff's mental health. Clinical Trial Registration: German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS), Identifier: DRKS00030973.

医疗保健人员的弹性:数字培训计划的随机对照试验。
护理和直接护理人员面临着重大的心理和身体挑战,包括高工作量、情绪劳动和人员短缺,这些都增加了倦怠和压力相关疾病的风险。适应力是一种保护性因素,可以减轻这些影响。本研究评估了针对护理人员和直接护理人员需求量身定制的28天数字复原力培训计划的效果。120名在德国医疗机构工作的参与者被随机分配到实验组或候补对照组。实验组的参与者在四周内每天接受两次基于视频的练习、反思和放松活动。结果在基线(T1)、干预后(T2)和三个月随访(T3)进行评估。采用弹性量表(Resilience Scale)测量弹性(primary outcomes),采用感知压力问卷(perceived stress Questionnaire, PSQ)测量感知压力(secondary outcomes)。与对照组相比,实验组参与者从T1到T3表现出显著的恢复力改善(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.50%
发文量
93
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings is an international forum for the publication of peer-reviewed original papers related to all areas of the science and practice of psychologists in medical settings. Manuscripts are chosen that have a broad appeal across psychology as well as other health care disciplines, reflecting varying backgrounds, interests, and specializations. The journal publishes original research, treatment outcome trials, meta-analyses, literature reviews, conceptual papers, brief scientific reports, and scholarly case studies. Papers accepted address clinical matters in medical settings; integrated care; health disparities; education and training of the future psychology workforce; interdisciplinary collaboration, training, and professionalism; licensing, credentialing, and privileging in hospital practice; research and practice ethics; professional development of psychologists in academic health centers; professional practice matters in medical settings; and cultural, economic, political, regulatory, and systems factors in health care. In summary, the journal provides a forum for papers predicted to have significant theoretical or practical importance for the application of psychology in medical settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信