Minimum invasive drill-and-blast designs for optimizing pull efficiency and minimizing overbreaks/underbreaks in varying rock masses

Q4 Earth and Planetary Sciences
Dr. Aditya Rana, Dr. Arvind Kumar Gond, Chiranjeet Rakshit, Dr. Santosh Kumar, Dr. Chhangte Sawmliana
{"title":"Minimum invasive drill-and-blast designs for optimizing pull efficiency and minimizing overbreaks/underbreaks in varying rock masses","authors":"Dr. Aditya Rana,&nbsp;Dr. Arvind Kumar Gond,&nbsp;Chiranjeet Rakshit,&nbsp;Dr. Santosh Kumar,&nbsp;Dr. Chhangte Sawmliana","doi":"10.1002/geot.202400061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In tunneling and underground projects, the drill-and-blast method is most commonly utilized for rock excavation. It is notable for cost-effectiveness and versatility in achieving different tunnel profiles. Though the technique has advantages, it also has challenges such as overbreak, undercut, and occasional poor advances, which can increase project costs and delays. The outcome of blast results is also associated with the competency of driller in effectively drilling the planned holes. Hence, frequent and substantial modifications in the blast designs to attain good profile and pull can adversely affect the driller's performance, thereby reducing the desired outcome. This article presents a case study of the Sivok-Rangpo tunnels passing through different classes of rock mass (class III–VI). Minimum changes in cut pattern and periphery holes design were incorporated and found efficient in increasing the tunnel advance rate to 90–92 % of the drill hole length. The processes also reduced the overbreak and underbreak considerably.</p>","PeriodicalId":39412,"journal":{"name":"Geomechanik und Tunnelbau","volume":"18 3","pages":"218-224"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geomechanik und Tunnelbau","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/geot.202400061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In tunneling and underground projects, the drill-and-blast method is most commonly utilized for rock excavation. It is notable for cost-effectiveness and versatility in achieving different tunnel profiles. Though the technique has advantages, it also has challenges such as overbreak, undercut, and occasional poor advances, which can increase project costs and delays. The outcome of blast results is also associated with the competency of driller in effectively drilling the planned holes. Hence, frequent and substantial modifications in the blast designs to attain good profile and pull can adversely affect the driller's performance, thereby reducing the desired outcome. This article presents a case study of the Sivok-Rangpo tunnels passing through different classes of rock mass (class III–VI). Minimum changes in cut pattern and periphery holes design were incorporated and found efficient in increasing the tunnel advance rate to 90–92 % of the drill hole length. The processes also reduced the overbreak and underbreak considerably.

最小侵入式钻爆设计,可优化拉拔效率,最大限度地减少不同岩体中的过断/下断
在隧道和地下工程中,钻爆法是岩石开挖最常用的方法。值得注意的是,它具有成本效益和通用性,可以实现不同的隧道轮廓。尽管该技术具有优势,但也存在一些挑战,如超限、削弱和偶尔的进度不佳,这些都会增加项目成本和延迟。爆破效果的好坏也与司钻的能力有关。因此,为了获得良好的轮廓和拉力,频繁而实质性地修改爆破设计可能会对司钻的工作性能产生不利影响,从而降低预期的结果。本文介绍了通过不同类型岩体(III-VI类)的Sivok-Rangpo隧道的案例研究。将切割模式和外围孔设计的最小变化纳入其中,并发现有效地将隧道推进率提高到钻孔长度的90 - 92%。这些过程也大大减少了超溃和欠溃。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geomechanik und Tunnelbau
Geomechanik und Tunnelbau Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: The contributions published in Geomechanics and Tunnelling deal with practical aspects of applied engineering geology, rock mechanics and rock engineering, soil mechanics and foundation engineering, and primarily tunnelling. Each issue focuses on a current topic or specific project. Brief news, reports from construction sites and news on conferences round off the content. From the start of 2009 Geomechanics and Tunnelling has been published as a bilingual English/German journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信