{"title":"Exploring ChatGPT-Facilitated Scaffolding in Undergraduates' Mathematical Problem Solving","authors":"Ruijie Zhou, Xiuling He, Qiong Fan, Yangyang Li, Yue Li, Xiong Xiao, Jing Fang","doi":"10.1111/jcal.70077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>ChatGPT, an AI-based chatbot, supports learning by accurately interpreting and responding to user inputs. Despite its potential, few empirical studies have examined its influence on college students' mathematical problem-solving processes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to introduce a ChatGPT-facilitated scaffolding to investigate its impact on students' mathematical problem-solving behaviours, performance and perceptions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty-nine undergraduates participated in this study, engaging in mathematical problem-solving tasks using the scaffolding. A mixed-method approach was employed, incorporating performance data, interaction analysis and self-reported surveys to assess both quantitative and qualitative aspects of students' experiences. In particular, lag sequential analysis was applied to explore the undergraduates' problem-solving behavioural patterns.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results and Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Results demonstrated that the ChatGPT-facilitated scaffolding significantly improved students' mathematical problem-solving performance. The high-performance group (HPG) exhibited a greater frequency of interpretive and evaluative activities, transitioning from factual to metacognitive representations, while the low-performance group (LPG) primarily transitioned from prompt selection to procedural representations. Additionally, most participants expressed positive perceptions of the scaffolding experience and reported an improvement in their problem-solving skills.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Major Takeaways</h3>\n \n <p>These findings offer valuable insights for the design and implementation of AI-facilitated learning activities in mathematical problem-solving contexts.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48071,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning","volume":"41 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcal.70077","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
ChatGPT, an AI-based chatbot, supports learning by accurately interpreting and responding to user inputs. Despite its potential, few empirical studies have examined its influence on college students' mathematical problem-solving processes.
Objectives
This study aimed to introduce a ChatGPT-facilitated scaffolding to investigate its impact on students' mathematical problem-solving behaviours, performance and perceptions.
Methods
Twenty-nine undergraduates participated in this study, engaging in mathematical problem-solving tasks using the scaffolding. A mixed-method approach was employed, incorporating performance data, interaction analysis and self-reported surveys to assess both quantitative and qualitative aspects of students' experiences. In particular, lag sequential analysis was applied to explore the undergraduates' problem-solving behavioural patterns.
Results and Conclusions
Results demonstrated that the ChatGPT-facilitated scaffolding significantly improved students' mathematical problem-solving performance. The high-performance group (HPG) exhibited a greater frequency of interpretive and evaluative activities, transitioning from factual to metacognitive representations, while the low-performance group (LPG) primarily transitioned from prompt selection to procedural representations. Additionally, most participants expressed positive perceptions of the scaffolding experience and reported an improvement in their problem-solving skills.
Major Takeaways
These findings offer valuable insights for the design and implementation of AI-facilitated learning activities in mathematical problem-solving contexts.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Computer Assisted Learning is an international peer-reviewed journal which covers the whole range of uses of information and communication technology to support learning and knowledge exchange. It aims to provide a medium for communication among researchers as well as a channel linking researchers, practitioners, and policy makers. JCAL is also a rich source of material for master and PhD students in areas such as educational psychology, the learning sciences, instructional technology, instructional design, collaborative learning, intelligent learning systems, learning analytics, open, distance and networked learning, and educational evaluation and assessment. This is the case for formal (e.g., schools), non-formal (e.g., workplace learning) and informal learning (e.g., museums and libraries) situations and environments. Volumes often include one Special Issue which these provides readers with a broad and in-depth perspective on a specific topic. First published in 1985, JCAL continues to have the aim of making the outcomes of contemporary research and experience accessible. During this period there have been major technological advances offering new opportunities and approaches in the use of a wide range of technologies to support learning and knowledge transfer more generally. There is currently much emphasis on the use of network functionality and the challenges its appropriate uses pose to teachers/tutors working with students locally and at a distance. JCAL welcomes: -Empirical reports, single studies or programmatic series of studies on the use of computers and information technologies in learning and assessment -Critical and original meta-reviews of literature on the use of computers for learning -Empirical studies on the design and development of innovative technology-based systems for learning -Conceptual articles on issues relating to the Aims and Scope