A Multi-Level Patch Dataset for JPEG Image Quality Assessment by Absolute Binary Decision

IF 2.9 Q2 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Soichiro Honda;Yoshihiro Maeda;Osamu Watanabe;Norishige Fukushima
{"title":"A Multi-Level Patch Dataset for JPEG Image Quality Assessment by Absolute Binary Decision","authors":"Soichiro Honda;Yoshihiro Maeda;Osamu Watanabe;Norishige Fukushima","doi":"10.1109/OJSP.2025.3571674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Image quality assessment (IQA) plays a fundamental role in evaluating image processing. Currently, JPEG AIC specifies the IQA methods, dividing them into three levels: AIC-1, 2, and 3. AIC-1 measures the quality from low to high, AIC-2 focuses on the threshold for visual losslessness, and AIC-3 measures the range between 1 and 2. AIC-3 requires complex processing and many comparisons, such as using boosted triplets to obtain highly accurate JNDs and then using those JNDs to create scale scores, or generating many combinations of triplets. In this study, we revisit the definition and propose a method for measuring the target band of AIC-3 by mixing the measurement methods of AIC-1 and AIC-2 and adjusting the sensitivity. This method presents the pristine and degraded images and asks whether they are the same or not. We called this absolute binary decision (ABD), referring to ACR in AIC-1. We constructed a JPEG-specific IQA dataset using ABD from distorted images that were progressively patched to relate the patches to the IQA of the entire images. As this was a new experiment, it was first conducted under laboratory control to ensure reliability. The experimental results showed that ABD could measure the QP40-90 range. In addition, it was found that patching differs from the entire image case. While patching draws attention to places that people do not usually pay attention to, usual image presentation concentrates attention through semantic guidance, suggesting the possibility that pseudo-attention patching is being performed on characteristic locations.","PeriodicalId":73300,"journal":{"name":"IEEE open journal of signal processing","volume":"6 ","pages":"631-640"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=11007521","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE open journal of signal processing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11007521/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Image quality assessment (IQA) plays a fundamental role in evaluating image processing. Currently, JPEG AIC specifies the IQA methods, dividing them into three levels: AIC-1, 2, and 3. AIC-1 measures the quality from low to high, AIC-2 focuses on the threshold for visual losslessness, and AIC-3 measures the range between 1 and 2. AIC-3 requires complex processing and many comparisons, such as using boosted triplets to obtain highly accurate JNDs and then using those JNDs to create scale scores, or generating many combinations of triplets. In this study, we revisit the definition and propose a method for measuring the target band of AIC-3 by mixing the measurement methods of AIC-1 and AIC-2 and adjusting the sensitivity. This method presents the pristine and degraded images and asks whether they are the same or not. We called this absolute binary decision (ABD), referring to ACR in AIC-1. We constructed a JPEG-specific IQA dataset using ABD from distorted images that were progressively patched to relate the patches to the IQA of the entire images. As this was a new experiment, it was first conducted under laboratory control to ensure reliability. The experimental results showed that ABD could measure the QP40-90 range. In addition, it was found that patching differs from the entire image case. While patching draws attention to places that people do not usually pay attention to, usual image presentation concentrates attention through semantic guidance, suggesting the possibility that pseudo-attention patching is being performed on characteristic locations.
基于绝对二值决策的JPEG图像质量评价多级补丁数据集
图像质量评价(IQA)是评价图像处理效果的基础。目前,JPEG AIC指定了IQA方法,并将它们分为AIC-1、AIC- 2和AIC- 3三个级别。AIC-1测量从低到高的质量,AIC-2关注视觉无损的阈值,AIC-3测量1到2之间的范围。AIC-3需要复杂的处理和许多比较,例如使用增强的三元组来获得高度精确的JNDs,然后使用这些JNDs来创建尺度分数,或者生成三元组的许多组合。在本研究中,我们重新定义了AIC-3的定义,并提出了一种混合AIC-1和AIC-2测量方法并调整灵敏度来测量AIC-3目标波段的方法。该方法呈现原始图像和退化图像,并询问它们是否相同。我们称之为绝对二元决策(ABD),参考AIC-1中的ACR。我们使用ABD从扭曲的图像中构建了一个jpeg特定的IQA数据集,这些图像被逐步修补,将这些补丁与整个图像的IQA联系起来。由于这是一项新实验,为了确保可靠性,首先在实验室控制下进行。实验结果表明,ABD可以测量QP40-90范围。此外,还发现修补与整个图像情况不同。修补将人们的注意力吸引到人们通常不注意的地方,而通常的图像呈现通过语义引导来集中注意力,这表明在特征位置上进行伪注意修补的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信