Jasmin Spaar , Peter Biro , Michael Sander , Volker Gross , Michael Scholtes , Keywan Sohrabi
{"title":"Safety and efficacy of high frequency jet ventilation: A systematic and narrative review","authors":"Jasmin Spaar , Peter Biro , Michael Sander , Volker Gross , Michael Scholtes , Keywan Sohrabi","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2025.111906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>High-Frequency Jet Ventilation (HFJV) is a specific modality of mechanical ventilation employed in certain operative and critical care settings. Despite its technical advantages, particularly in procedures requiring minimal organ motion, HFJV remains underutilised in routine clinical practice, largely due to limited high-quality evidence and the absence of formal national guidelines.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This systematic review aims to critically appraise the current evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of HFJV in adult and paediatric patients. The analysis covers both operating room and intensive care unit settings, and compares HFJV with conventional ventilation strategies.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A comprehensive literature search was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. We included 41 studies published after 1997, which were appraised using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (OCEBM) levels of evidence and Cochrane risk-of-bias tools (RoB 2 and ROBINS-I).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Most studies demonstrated favourable physiological and procedural outcomes with HFJV in intraoperative settings, The benefits were most notable during airway surgeries, tissue ablation procedures, and atrial fibrillation ablation.. In contrast, results in neonatal intensive care were heterogeneous, with some studies reporting improved gas exchange, while others indicated higher complication or mortality rates. Common limitations included small sample sizes, methodological heterogeneity, and risk of selection and publication bias. Volatile anaesthetic delivery was universally unfeasible, and HFJV performance was reduced in obese or COPD patients.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This review underscores the need for further research to optimise HFJV application and to better understand its long-term clinical impacts. The insights gained provide valuable guidance for future clinical use.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","volume":"106 ","pages":"Article 111906"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952818025001679","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
High-Frequency Jet Ventilation (HFJV) is a specific modality of mechanical ventilation employed in certain operative and critical care settings. Despite its technical advantages, particularly in procedures requiring minimal organ motion, HFJV remains underutilised in routine clinical practice, largely due to limited high-quality evidence and the absence of formal national guidelines.
Objective
This systematic review aims to critically appraise the current evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of HFJV in adult and paediatric patients. The analysis covers both operating room and intensive care unit settings, and compares HFJV with conventional ventilation strategies.
Methods
A comprehensive literature search was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. We included 41 studies published after 1997, which were appraised using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (OCEBM) levels of evidence and Cochrane risk-of-bias tools (RoB 2 and ROBINS-I).
Results
Most studies demonstrated favourable physiological and procedural outcomes with HFJV in intraoperative settings, The benefits were most notable during airway surgeries, tissue ablation procedures, and atrial fibrillation ablation.. In contrast, results in neonatal intensive care were heterogeneous, with some studies reporting improved gas exchange, while others indicated higher complication or mortality rates. Common limitations included small sample sizes, methodological heterogeneity, and risk of selection and publication bias. Volatile anaesthetic delivery was universally unfeasible, and HFJV performance was reduced in obese or COPD patients.
Conclusions
This review underscores the need for further research to optimise HFJV application and to better understand its long-term clinical impacts. The insights gained provide valuable guidance for future clinical use.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Anesthesia (JCA) addresses all aspects of anesthesia practice, including anesthetic administration, pharmacokinetics, preoperative and postoperative considerations, coexisting disease and other complicating factors, cost issues, and similar concerns anesthesiologists contend with daily. Exceptionally high standards of presentation and accuracy are maintained.
The core of the journal is original contributions on subjects relevant to clinical practice, and rigorously peer-reviewed. Highly respected international experts have joined together to form the Editorial Board, sharing their years of experience and clinical expertise. Specialized section editors cover the various subspecialties within the field. To keep your practical clinical skills current, the journal bridges the gap between the laboratory and the clinical practice of anesthesiology and critical care to clarify how new insights can improve daily practice.