Managing paradoxical tensions between Corporate Social Responsibility and Automation: How organizations reach sustainability and digital transformation

IF 10 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
João Felipe Capioto Seelent , Fernando Henrique Lermen , Cíntia Wilke Franco , Guilherme Brittes Benitez
{"title":"Managing paradoxical tensions between Corporate Social Responsibility and Automation: How organizations reach sustainability and digital transformation","authors":"João Felipe Capioto Seelent ,&nbsp;Fernando Henrique Lermen ,&nbsp;Cíntia Wilke Franco ,&nbsp;Guilherme Brittes Benitez","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpe.2025.109706","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While organizations pursue automation to achieve superior performance, their stakeholders also demand that they be socially responsible. On one hand, automation looks at machines and how organizations enhance operational efficiency. On the other hand, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) looks at people by aligning companies with stakeholder expectations. Balancing automation and CSR often create organizational tensions since one looks at machines and another at people. However, both elements are essential for companies aiming to achieve sustainability and digital transformation in today's competitive landscape. Hitherto, no existing studies have explored how CSR and automation, viewed as paradoxical tensions, can be synergized to improve sustainability and digital transformation outcomes. This study aims to investigate the paradoxical interaction between CSR and automation, examining their joint effect on sustainability and digital transformation. The research employs an econometric analysis based on data from 402 Brazilian organizations to evaluate the influence of CSR and automation on financial, environmental, and social performances and digital transformation adoption. The findings reveal that while CSR and automation synergize to enhance environmental and social performance and the adoption of digital transformation, they have no significant effect on financial performance. However, in a post-hoc test, financial performance manifests after organizations achieve environmental, social, and digital transformation outcomes. This study provides theoretical insights into managing CSR-Automation tensions, advancing the literature on paradox theory in operations management. We offer a novel framework for reconciling the conflicting demands of CSR and automation. Simultaneously, we propose a balanced approach to achieving sustainability and digital transformation, underscoring the importance of managers balancing high commitment from CSR and high performance from automation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14287,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Production Economics","volume":"288 ","pages":"Article 109706"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Production Economics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527325001914","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While organizations pursue automation to achieve superior performance, their stakeholders also demand that they be socially responsible. On one hand, automation looks at machines and how organizations enhance operational efficiency. On the other hand, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) looks at people by aligning companies with stakeholder expectations. Balancing automation and CSR often create organizational tensions since one looks at machines and another at people. However, both elements are essential for companies aiming to achieve sustainability and digital transformation in today's competitive landscape. Hitherto, no existing studies have explored how CSR and automation, viewed as paradoxical tensions, can be synergized to improve sustainability and digital transformation outcomes. This study aims to investigate the paradoxical interaction between CSR and automation, examining their joint effect on sustainability and digital transformation. The research employs an econometric analysis based on data from 402 Brazilian organizations to evaluate the influence of CSR and automation on financial, environmental, and social performances and digital transformation adoption. The findings reveal that while CSR and automation synergize to enhance environmental and social performance and the adoption of digital transformation, they have no significant effect on financial performance. However, in a post-hoc test, financial performance manifests after organizations achieve environmental, social, and digital transformation outcomes. This study provides theoretical insights into managing CSR-Automation tensions, advancing the literature on paradox theory in operations management. We offer a novel framework for reconciling the conflicting demands of CSR and automation. Simultaneously, we propose a balanced approach to achieving sustainability and digital transformation, underscoring the importance of managers balancing high commitment from CSR and high performance from automation.
管理企业社会责任和自动化之间矛盾的紧张关系:组织如何实现可持续发展和数字化转型
当组织追求自动化以实现卓越绩效时,他们的利益相关者也要求他们对社会负责。一方面,自动化着眼于机器和组织如何提高运营效率。另一方面,企业社会责任(CSR)通过使公司与利益相关者的期望保持一致来关注人。平衡自动化和企业社会责任通常会造成组织紧张,因为一个关注机器,另一个关注人。然而,在当今竞争激烈的环境中,这两个要素对于企业实现可持续发展和数字化转型至关重要。到目前为止,还没有研究探索企业社会责任和自动化如何协同起来,以提高可持续性和数字化转型的结果,这被视为矛盾的紧张关系。本研究旨在探讨企业社会责任与自动化之间的矛盾互动,考察它们对可持续发展和数字化转型的共同影响。该研究采用了基于402家巴西组织数据的计量经济学分析,以评估企业社会责任和自动化对财务、环境和社会绩效以及数字化转型采用的影响。研究结果显示,虽然企业社会责任和自动化协同提高环境和社会绩效以及采用数字化转型,但它们对财务绩效没有显著影响。然而,在事后测试中,财务绩效在组织实现环境、社会和数字化转型成果后才显现出来。本研究为管理企业社会责任与自动化之间的矛盾提供了理论见解,推进了运营管理中悖论理论的研究。我们提供了一个新的框架来协调企业社会责任和自动化的冲突需求。同时,我们提出了一种平衡的方法来实现可持续发展和数字化转型,强调管理者平衡企业社会责任的高承诺和自动化的高绩效的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Production Economics
International Journal of Production Economics 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
21.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
266
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Production Economics focuses on the interface between engineering and management. It covers all aspects of manufacturing and process industries, as well as production in general. The journal is interdisciplinary, considering activities throughout the product life cycle and material flow cycle. It aims to disseminate knowledge for improving industrial practice and strengthening the theoretical base for decision making. The journal serves as a forum for exchanging ideas and presenting new developments in theory and application, combining academic standards with practical value for industrial applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信