A standard operating procedure for the evaluation of vertical jumps performance through surface electromyography assessment: A scoping review

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Luca Petrigna , Alessandra Amato , Giorgia Longo , Alessandro Castorina , Simona Pajaujiene , Giuseppe Musumeci
{"title":"A standard operating procedure for the evaluation of vertical jumps performance through surface electromyography assessment: A scoping review","authors":"Luca Petrigna ,&nbsp;Alessandra Amato ,&nbsp;Giorgia Longo ,&nbsp;Alessandro Castorina ,&nbsp;Simona Pajaujiene ,&nbsp;Giuseppe Musumeci","doi":"10.1016/j.jelekin.2025.103028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The Countermovement Jump (CMJ) and the Squat Jump (SJ) are widely adopted tests to assess muscle strength and power. Neuromuscular data of the jump performance could be provided by surface Electromyography (EMG). While from a biomechanical and technical point of view, there are articles that support the two vertical jumps, less is published regarding surface EMG and the jumps. The objective of the present study was to review the literature to better understand the protocols adopted for a surface EMG evaluation during the CMJ and the SJ and eventually to propose a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). A SOP could be a useful tool to better understand, compare, and interpret the findings.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A scoping review was performed. Data were collected on PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus till 20<sup>th</sup> December 2024. The articles were screened against the eligibility criteria and narratively discussed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 54 articles met the eligibility criteria. The articles present important differences in the methodology and the procedures followed. Differences were also detected in the hardware and the data analysis. From the common information of the articles, a SOP was proposed.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Different methodologies were adopted to evaluate neuromuscular function during the CMJ and the SJ tests. This makes difficult to compare the data. A SOP was proposed with information and guidelines related to muscles, hardware, and data processing. In this way, future studies could follow similar protocols increasing the possibility to compare the findings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology","volume":"83 ","pages":"Article 103028"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1050641125000549","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The Countermovement Jump (CMJ) and the Squat Jump (SJ) are widely adopted tests to assess muscle strength and power. Neuromuscular data of the jump performance could be provided by surface Electromyography (EMG). While from a biomechanical and technical point of view, there are articles that support the two vertical jumps, less is published regarding surface EMG and the jumps. The objective of the present study was to review the literature to better understand the protocols adopted for a surface EMG evaluation during the CMJ and the SJ and eventually to propose a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). A SOP could be a useful tool to better understand, compare, and interpret the findings.

Methods

A scoping review was performed. Data were collected on PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus till 20th December 2024. The articles were screened against the eligibility criteria and narratively discussed.

Results

A total of 54 articles met the eligibility criteria. The articles present important differences in the methodology and the procedures followed. Differences were also detected in the hardware and the data analysis. From the common information of the articles, a SOP was proposed.

Conclusions

Different methodologies were adopted to evaluate neuromuscular function during the CMJ and the SJ tests. This makes difficult to compare the data. A SOP was proposed with information and guidelines related to muscles, hardware, and data processing. In this way, future studies could follow similar protocols increasing the possibility to compare the findings.
通过表面肌电图评估评估垂直跳跃性能的标准操作程序:范围审查
反向起跳(CMJ)和深蹲起跳(SJ)是被广泛采用的评估肌肉力量和力量的测试。表面肌电图(EMG)可以提供跳跃性能的神经肌肉数据。虽然从生物力学和技术的角度来看,有文章支持两种垂直跳跃,但关于表面肌电图和跳跃的文章较少。本研究的目的是回顾文献,以更好地了解在CMJ和SJ期间采用的表面肌电评估方案,并最终提出标准操作程序(SOP)。SOP可以成为更好地理解、比较和解释调查结果的有用工具。方法进行范围综述。数据收集于PubMed、Web of Science和Scopus,截止到2024年12月20日。根据资格标准对文章进行筛选并进行叙述讨论。结果54篇文章符合入选标准。这两篇文章在方法和所遵循的程序方面存在重要差异。在硬件和数据分析方面也发现了差异。根据文章的共同信息,提出了SOP。结论在CMJ和SJ试验中采用不同的方法评价神经肌肉功能。这使得比较数据变得困难。我们提出了一个SOP,其中包含与肌肉、硬件和数据处理相关的信息和指南。通过这种方式,未来的研究可以遵循类似的协议,增加比较研究结果的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Electromyography & Kinesiology is the primary source for outstanding original articles on the study of human movement from muscle contraction via its motor units and sensory system to integrated motion through mechanical and electrical detection techniques. As the official publication of the International Society of Electrophysiology and Kinesiology, the journal is dedicated to publishing the best work in all areas of electromyography and kinesiology, including: control of movement, muscle fatigue, muscle and nerve properties, joint biomechanics and electrical stimulation. Applications in rehabilitation, sports & exercise, motion analysis, ergonomics, alternative & complimentary medicine, measures of human performance and technical articles on electromyographic signal processing are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信