The team orienteering problem with service times and mandatory & incompatible nodes

IF 4.3 2区 工程技术 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Alberto Guastalla, Roberto Aringhieri, Pierre Hosteins
{"title":"The team orienteering problem with service times and mandatory & incompatible nodes","authors":"Alberto Guastalla,&nbsp;Roberto Aringhieri,&nbsp;Pierre Hosteins","doi":"10.1016/j.cor.2025.107170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Team Orienteering Problem with Service Times and Mandatory &amp; Incompatible Nodes (TOP-ST-MIN) is a variant of the classic Team Orienteering Problem (TOP), which includes three features that stem from two real-world problems previously studied by the authors: service time at nodes, mandatory nodes and physical or logical incompatibilities between pairs of nodes. We gather all these ingredients for the first time in the same model and prove that even finding a feasible solution to this problem is NP-complete unlike the TOP where finding a feasible solution is straightforward. Two versions of this variant are considered in our study. For such versions, we proposed two alternative mathematical formulations, a route-based and a flow-based formulations. Based on the flow-based formulation, we developed a Cutting-Plane Algorithm (CPA) exploiting five families of valid inequalities, which are either new or have generally not been used as such in the TOP literature and separated by means of new algorithmic methods. Extensive computational experiments showed that the CPA outperforms CPLEX in solving the new benchmark instances, generated in such a way to evaluate the impact of the three novel features that characterise the problem. The CPA is also competitive for the TOP since it is able to solve almost the same number of instances as the state-of-art algorithms.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10542,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Operations Research","volume":"183 ","pages":"Article 107170"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Operations Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305054825001984","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Team Orienteering Problem with Service Times and Mandatory & Incompatible Nodes (TOP-ST-MIN) is a variant of the classic Team Orienteering Problem (TOP), which includes three features that stem from two real-world problems previously studied by the authors: service time at nodes, mandatory nodes and physical or logical incompatibilities between pairs of nodes. We gather all these ingredients for the first time in the same model and prove that even finding a feasible solution to this problem is NP-complete unlike the TOP where finding a feasible solution is straightforward. Two versions of this variant are considered in our study. For such versions, we proposed two alternative mathematical formulations, a route-based and a flow-based formulations. Based on the flow-based formulation, we developed a Cutting-Plane Algorithm (CPA) exploiting five families of valid inequalities, which are either new or have generally not been used as such in the TOP literature and separated by means of new algorithmic methods. Extensive computational experiments showed that the CPA outperforms CPLEX in solving the new benchmark instances, generated in such a way to evaluate the impact of the three novel features that characterise the problem. The CPA is also competitive for the TOP since it is able to solve almost the same number of instances as the state-of-art algorithms.
服务时间和强制和不兼容节点的团队定向问题
具有服务时间和强制性的团队定向问题不兼容节点(TOP- st - min)是经典的团队定向问题(TOP)的变体,它包括三个特征,这些特征源于作者先前研究的两个现实世界问题:节点的服务时间、强制节点和节点对之间的物理或逻辑不兼容。我们首次在同一个模型中收集了所有这些成分,并证明即使找到这个问题的可行解决方案也是np完全的,而不像TOP那样找到可行解决方案是直截了当的。在我们的研究中考虑了这种变体的两个版本。对于这样的版本,我们提出了两个可选的数学公式,一个基于路线的公式和一个基于流的公式。基于基于流的公式,我们开发了一种切割平面算法(CPA),利用五类有效不等式,这些不等式要么是新的,要么通常没有在TOP文献中使用,并通过新的算法方法进行分离。大量的计算实验表明,CPA在解决新的基准实例方面优于CPLEX,以这种方式生成的基准实例可以评估表征问题的三个新特征的影响。CPA对TOP也有竞争力,因为它能够解决与最先进的算法几乎相同数量的实例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computers & Operations Research
Computers & Operations Research 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
8.70%
发文量
292
审稿时长
8.5 months
期刊介绍: Operations research and computers meet in a large number of scientific fields, many of which are of vital current concern to our troubled society. These include, among others, ecology, transportation, safety, reliability, urban planning, economics, inventory control, investment strategy and logistics (including reverse logistics). Computers & Operations Research provides an international forum for the application of computers and operations research techniques to problems in these and related fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信