{"title":"Study of the optimal layout of U-bolt restraints used for High-Energy pipelines based on parametric modeling","authors":"Ruoxi Yang, Xiao Han, Xia Yang, Xiaozhou Xia","doi":"10.1016/j.anucene.2025.111656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The protective design of high-temperature, high-pressure pipelines is critical for nuclear safety. Current specifications underestimate the injection forces compared to those in actual engineering scenarios. There has been limited research on anti-whipping components for high-energy pipelines, especially those operating above 300 °C and 30.0 MPa. This study utilized a collaborative simulation scheme combining ANSYS APDL (Ansys Parametric Design Language) and LS-DYNA to optimize U-bolt restraints for high-energy pipelines. Parametric modelling of U-bolt restraints was performed in ANSYS APDL, while impact simulations were conducted in LS-DYNA. Sensitivity analysis showed that the U-bolt restraint number, diameter, and fixed leg length significantly affected the anti-whipping performance. An anti-whipping failure criterion based on the kinetic energy was proposed and used in the optimization process. The results suggest that arranging three U-bolts obliquely in the pipeline’s elbow improves the performance, and for a double-bend pipe, intact U-bolts prevent failure from oblique loads.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8006,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Nuclear Energy","volume":"223 ","pages":"Article 111656"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Nuclear Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306454925004736","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The protective design of high-temperature, high-pressure pipelines is critical for nuclear safety. Current specifications underestimate the injection forces compared to those in actual engineering scenarios. There has been limited research on anti-whipping components for high-energy pipelines, especially those operating above 300 °C and 30.0 MPa. This study utilized a collaborative simulation scheme combining ANSYS APDL (Ansys Parametric Design Language) and LS-DYNA to optimize U-bolt restraints for high-energy pipelines. Parametric modelling of U-bolt restraints was performed in ANSYS APDL, while impact simulations were conducted in LS-DYNA. Sensitivity analysis showed that the U-bolt restraint number, diameter, and fixed leg length significantly affected the anti-whipping performance. An anti-whipping failure criterion based on the kinetic energy was proposed and used in the optimization process. The results suggest that arranging three U-bolts obliquely in the pipeline’s elbow improves the performance, and for a double-bend pipe, intact U-bolts prevent failure from oblique loads.
期刊介绍:
Annals of Nuclear Energy provides an international medium for the communication of original research, ideas and developments in all areas of the field of nuclear energy science and technology. Its scope embraces nuclear fuel reserves, fuel cycles and cost, materials, processing, system and component technology (fission only), design and optimization, direct conversion of nuclear energy sources, environmental control, reactor physics, heat transfer and fluid dynamics, structural analysis, fuel management, future developments, nuclear fuel and safety, nuclear aerosol, neutron physics, computer technology (both software and hardware), risk assessment, radioactive waste disposal and reactor thermal hydraulics. Papers submitted to Annals need to demonstrate a clear link to nuclear power generation/nuclear engineering. Papers which deal with pure nuclear physics, pure health physics, imaging, or attenuation and shielding properties of concretes and various geological materials are not within the scope of the journal. Also, papers that deal with policy or economics are not within the scope of the journal.