Qionghua You , Zhen Ye , Chen Chen , Huan Xie , Yanmin Jin , Rong Huang , Changyou Xu , Yusheng Xu , Xiaohua Tong
{"title":"Bundle adjustment for multi-source Mars orbiter imagery with generalized control constraints","authors":"Qionghua You , Zhen Ye , Chen Chen , Huan Xie , Yanmin Jin , Rong Huang , Changyou Xu , Yusheng Xu , Xiaohua Tong","doi":"10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2025.05.030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Integration of multi-source Mars orbiter imagery leverages diverse datasets to enhance surface details and mapping accuracy. Achieving spatial consistency is crucial, yet challenges arise from significant resolution differences and the lack of ground control points. This paper proposes a bundle adjustment method with generalized control constraints tailored for multi-source orbiter imagery. A bias compensation model using affine and cubic spline functions is employed to effectively correct linear and nonlinear distortions. Generalized control constraints integrate planar and elevation aspects through planar control points, virtual control points, tie points, and terrain information. Planar weak control constraints are established by crater features extraction utilizing the Segment Anything Model 2, ellipse fitting, and accurate point set matching, with further enhancement from slope information derived from reference terrain. Elevation control constraints are established using the reference Digital Elevation Models and slope data. An adaptive weighting strategy is developed to combine these aspects optimally, facilitating precise registration of multi-source orbiter imagery to a unified Mars reference frame. Experiments with Mars Context Camera (CTX) and High-Resolution Imaging Science Experiment data validate the performance of the proposed method across various Martian terrains, demonstrating significant reductions in reprojection residuals from approximately 10 pixels to under 0.8 pixels. Additionally, the planar positioning accuracy improved from a maximum of over 300 m to within 18 m, with elevation accuracy within 3 m. Comparisons with existing adjustment methods and fully controlled CTX mosaic products confirm the effectiveness and reliability of the proposed method.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50269,"journal":{"name":"ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing","volume":"227 ","pages":"Pages 316-331"},"PeriodicalIF":10.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924271625002175","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Integration of multi-source Mars orbiter imagery leverages diverse datasets to enhance surface details and mapping accuracy. Achieving spatial consistency is crucial, yet challenges arise from significant resolution differences and the lack of ground control points. This paper proposes a bundle adjustment method with generalized control constraints tailored for multi-source orbiter imagery. A bias compensation model using affine and cubic spline functions is employed to effectively correct linear and nonlinear distortions. Generalized control constraints integrate planar and elevation aspects through planar control points, virtual control points, tie points, and terrain information. Planar weak control constraints are established by crater features extraction utilizing the Segment Anything Model 2, ellipse fitting, and accurate point set matching, with further enhancement from slope information derived from reference terrain. Elevation control constraints are established using the reference Digital Elevation Models and slope data. An adaptive weighting strategy is developed to combine these aspects optimally, facilitating precise registration of multi-source orbiter imagery to a unified Mars reference frame. Experiments with Mars Context Camera (CTX) and High-Resolution Imaging Science Experiment data validate the performance of the proposed method across various Martian terrains, demonstrating significant reductions in reprojection residuals from approximately 10 pixels to under 0.8 pixels. Additionally, the planar positioning accuracy improved from a maximum of over 300 m to within 18 m, with elevation accuracy within 3 m. Comparisons with existing adjustment methods and fully controlled CTX mosaic products confirm the effectiveness and reliability of the proposed method.
期刊介绍:
The ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (P&RS) serves as the official journal of the International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ISPRS). It acts as a platform for scientists and professionals worldwide who are involved in various disciplines that utilize photogrammetry, remote sensing, spatial information systems, computer vision, and related fields. The journal aims to facilitate communication and dissemination of advancements in these disciplines, while also acting as a comprehensive source of reference and archive.
P&RS endeavors to publish high-quality, peer-reviewed research papers that are preferably original and have not been published before. These papers can cover scientific/research, technological development, or application/practical aspects. Additionally, the journal welcomes papers that are based on presentations from ISPRS meetings, as long as they are considered significant contributions to the aforementioned fields.
In particular, P&RS encourages the submission of papers that are of broad scientific interest, showcase innovative applications (especially in emerging fields), have an interdisciplinary focus, discuss topics that have received limited attention in P&RS or related journals, or explore new directions in scientific or professional realms. It is preferred that theoretical papers include practical applications, while papers focusing on systems and applications should include a theoretical background.