Çerağ Oğuztüzün , Zhenxiang Gao , Hui Li , Rong Xu
{"title":"KGiA: Drug repurposing through disease-aware knowledge graph augmentation","authors":"Çerağ Oğuztüzün , Zhenxiang Gao , Hui Li , Rong Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.jbi.2025.104857","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective:</h3><div>Drug repurposing offers a cost-effective strategy to accelerate drug development by identifying new therapeutic uses for approved medications. Knowledge graphs (KGs) that capture large amounts of biomedical knowledge have recently been used for drug repurposing, however, KGs are inherently incomplete due to our limited biomedical knowledge.</div></div><div><h3>Methods:</h3><div>We propose KGiA, an inductive graph augmentation method that supports semi-inductive reasoning—allowing models to generalize to previously unseen biomedical entities. KGiA enhances KGs using counterfactual relationships mined from disease-specific topological patterns. We apply it to a state-of-art biomedical KG constructed from six datasets including biomedical relationships extracted from biomedical literature, which comprised 1,614,801 triples and 100,563 entities, including 30,006 diseases.</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>Across five augmented architectures, KGiA improves generalizability by up to 24×<!--> <!-->in Mean Reciprocal Rank (MRR) and outperforms the state-of-the-art KG-based drug repurposing model by up to 32%. We applied KGiA in four case studies of diseases including Alzheimer’s Disease and showed its promise in identifying novel repurposed candidate drugs.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion:</h3><div>We showed that leveraging counterfactual relationships derived from disease-specific graph structures to augment existing knowledge graphs improved performance in KG-based drug repurposing.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15263,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","volume":"168 ","pages":"Article 104857"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532046425000863","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective:
Drug repurposing offers a cost-effective strategy to accelerate drug development by identifying new therapeutic uses for approved medications. Knowledge graphs (KGs) that capture large amounts of biomedical knowledge have recently been used for drug repurposing, however, KGs are inherently incomplete due to our limited biomedical knowledge.
Methods:
We propose KGiA, an inductive graph augmentation method that supports semi-inductive reasoning—allowing models to generalize to previously unseen biomedical entities. KGiA enhances KGs using counterfactual relationships mined from disease-specific topological patterns. We apply it to a state-of-art biomedical KG constructed from six datasets including biomedical relationships extracted from biomedical literature, which comprised 1,614,801 triples and 100,563 entities, including 30,006 diseases.
Results:
Across five augmented architectures, KGiA improves generalizability by up to 24× in Mean Reciprocal Rank (MRR) and outperforms the state-of-the-art KG-based drug repurposing model by up to 32%. We applied KGiA in four case studies of diseases including Alzheimer’s Disease and showed its promise in identifying novel repurposed candidate drugs.
Conclusion:
We showed that leveraging counterfactual relationships derived from disease-specific graph structures to augment existing knowledge graphs improved performance in KG-based drug repurposing.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Biomedical Informatics reflects a commitment to high-quality original research papers, reviews, and commentaries in the area of biomedical informatics methodology. Although we publish articles motivated by applications in the biomedical sciences (for example, clinical medicine, health care, population health, and translational bioinformatics), the journal emphasizes reports of new methodologies and techniques that have general applicability and that form the basis for the evolving science of biomedical informatics. Articles on medical devices; evaluations of implemented systems (including clinical trials of information technologies); or papers that provide insight into a biological process, a specific disease, or treatment options would generally be more suitable for publication in other venues. Papers on applications of signal processing and image analysis are often more suitable for biomedical engineering journals or other informatics journals, although we do publish papers that emphasize the information management and knowledge representation/modeling issues that arise in the storage and use of biological signals and images. System descriptions are welcome if they illustrate and substantiate the underlying methodology that is the principal focus of the report and an effort is made to address the generalizability and/or range of application of that methodology. Note also that, given the international nature of JBI, papers that deal with specific languages other than English, or with country-specific health systems or approaches, are acceptable for JBI only if they offer generalizable lessons that are relevant to the broad JBI readership, regardless of their country, language, culture, or health system.