Sharing drug checking results in a Canadian setting: a multi-site analysis

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Joshua Bird , Samuel Tobias , Cameron Grant , Mark Lysyshyn , Kenneth Tupper , Evan Wood , Thomas Kerr , Lianping Ti
{"title":"Sharing drug checking results in a Canadian setting: a multi-site analysis","authors":"Joshua Bird ,&nbsp;Samuel Tobias ,&nbsp;Cameron Grant ,&nbsp;Mark Lysyshyn ,&nbsp;Kenneth Tupper ,&nbsp;Evan Wood ,&nbsp;Thomas Kerr ,&nbsp;Lianping Ti","doi":"10.1016/j.drugpo.2025.104903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Drug checking services (DCS) have been implemented as a harm reduction measure to address high rates of illicit drug morbidity and mortality. In addition to reducing individual-level risk, there is also potential for DCS users to increase community level awareness of drug market conditions through sharing of drug checking results. However, little is known about the patterns of information sharing among people who use DCS.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data were derived from a cross-sectional study conducted at 22 community harm reduction sites offering DCS across British Columbia (BC) between March 2021 and July 2024. Two variable selection methods – backwards stepwise selection and elastic net regularization – were used to fit models which explored the relationships between select socio-demographic characteristics, drug use patterns and experiences with drug checking with the main outcome measure: sharing drug checking results.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>516 participants were included in the study (34 % women, median age 42); 274 (53 %) reported that they shared their drug checking results. Factors significantly and positively associated with sharing results in multivariable logistic regression analysis using both selection methods included: drug dealing, using DCS more than once, stable employment and white ethnicity. Among participants who reported they shared their drug checking results, 66 % reported sharing results with friends and family and 28 % reported sharing results with their drug dealer.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study revealed that over half the study sample shared their drug checking results with others, with results sharing being positively associated with recent drug dealing, frequent DCS utilisation, employment and ethnicity. Drug checking results were most often shared with friends, family and drug dealers. These findings extend the evidence base of DCS as a harm reduction tool by demonstrating how engagement with DCS facilitates information dissemination amongst drug market actors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48364,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Drug Policy","volume":"143 ","pages":"Article 104903"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Drug Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955395925002038","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Drug checking services (DCS) have been implemented as a harm reduction measure to address high rates of illicit drug morbidity and mortality. In addition to reducing individual-level risk, there is also potential for DCS users to increase community level awareness of drug market conditions through sharing of drug checking results. However, little is known about the patterns of information sharing among people who use DCS.

Methods

Data were derived from a cross-sectional study conducted at 22 community harm reduction sites offering DCS across British Columbia (BC) between March 2021 and July 2024. Two variable selection methods – backwards stepwise selection and elastic net regularization – were used to fit models which explored the relationships between select socio-demographic characteristics, drug use patterns and experiences with drug checking with the main outcome measure: sharing drug checking results.

Results

516 participants were included in the study (34 % women, median age 42); 274 (53 %) reported that they shared their drug checking results. Factors significantly and positively associated with sharing results in multivariable logistic regression analysis using both selection methods included: drug dealing, using DCS more than once, stable employment and white ethnicity. Among participants who reported they shared their drug checking results, 66 % reported sharing results with friends and family and 28 % reported sharing results with their drug dealer.

Conclusion

This study revealed that over half the study sample shared their drug checking results with others, with results sharing being positively associated with recent drug dealing, frequent DCS utilisation, employment and ethnicity. Drug checking results were most often shared with friends, family and drug dealers. These findings extend the evidence base of DCS as a harm reduction tool by demonstrating how engagement with DCS facilitates information dissemination amongst drug market actors.
在加拿大环境中共享药物检查结果:多站点分析
背景:药物检查服务已作为一项减少危害措施实施,以解决非法药物发病率和死亡率高的问题。除了减少个人层面的风险外,DCS使用者还有可能通过分享药物检查结果来提高社区层面对药物市场状况的认识。然而,人们对使用DCS的人之间的信息共享模式知之甚少。方法数据来自一项横断面研究,该研究于2021年3月至2024年7月在不列颠哥伦比亚省(BC) 22个提供DCS的社区减害站点进行。采用反向逐步选择和弹性网络正则化两种变量选择方法拟合模型,探讨了所选社会人口特征、吸毒模式和吸毒检查经验之间的关系,主要结果度量为:共享毒品检查结果。516名受试者纳入研究(34%为女性,中位年龄42岁);274名(53%)报告说他们分享了他们的药物检查结果。在使用两种选择方法的多变量logistic回归分析中,与共享结果显著正相关的因素包括:毒品交易、使用DCS不止一次、稳定就业和白人种族。在报告他们分享毒品检查结果的参与者中,66%报告与朋友和家人分享结果,28%报告与他们的毒贩分享结果。这项研究表明,超过一半的研究样本与他人分享了他们的毒品检查结果,结果共享与最近的毒品交易、频繁使用DCS、就业和种族呈正相关。毒品检查结果最常与朋友、家人和毒贩分享。这些发现通过展示参与DCS如何促进毒品市场行动者之间的信息传播,扩大了DCS作为减少危害工具的证据基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.40%
发文量
307
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Drug Policy provides a forum for the dissemination of current research, reviews, debate, and critical analysis on drug use and drug policy in a global context. It seeks to publish material on the social, political, legal, and health contexts of psychoactive substance use, both licit and illicit. The journal is particularly concerned to explore the effects of drug policy and practice on drug-using behaviour and its health and social consequences. It is the policy of the journal to represent a wide range of material on drug-related matters from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信