The importance of surveillance stool cultures during periods of severe neutropenia.

C L Wells, P Ferrieri, D J Weisdorf, F S Rhame
{"title":"The importance of surveillance stool cultures during periods of severe neutropenia.","authors":"C L Wells,&nbsp;P Ferrieri,&nbsp;D J Weisdorf,&nbsp;F S Rhame","doi":"10.1017/s0195941700066406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The correlation of fecal gram-negative bacilli (GNB), neutropenia, and bacteremia was studied in 45 bone marrow transplant recipients. Weekly stool cultures were prospectively monitored for GNB resistant to routine prophylactic and empiric antimicrobial agents. Seven cases of GNB bacteremia occurred in 45 patients described as follows. Twenty-three patients had no fecal or blood GNB. Fifteen patients had fecal GNB and no blood GNB; three of these latter patients had less than or equal to 50/mm3 circulating white blood cells (WBC) at the time of isolation of fecal GNB but two of the three were concurrently receiving appropriate empiric antibiotics. Two patients had blood GNB but no fecal GNB: one patient had a trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMZ)-sensitive isolate that would not be detectable in the feces by our methodology and one patient had feces analyzed only after the bacteremic event. Five patients had fecal GNB and blood GNB: one of these patients did not have a fecal sample analyzed prior to bacteremia but the remaining four patients had the same species/antibiogram of GNB isolated from the feces two to three days prior to the detection of bacteremia. Thus, the fecal GNB could have been used to predict the antibiogram of the subsequent blood GNB. In addition, all four of these latter bacteremic patients had less than or equal to 50/mm3 circulating WBC at the time of documented fecal GNB. Thus, bone marrow transplant recipients with fecal GNB coupled with severe neutropenia (less than or equal to 50/mm3 circulating WBC) were more likely to develop bacteremia (P less than 0.02) than were those with fecal GNB and greater than 50/mm3 circulating WBC.</p>","PeriodicalId":77726,"journal":{"name":"Infection control : IC","volume":"8 8","pages":"317-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/s0195941700066406","citationCount":"30","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection control : IC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0195941700066406","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30

Abstract

The correlation of fecal gram-negative bacilli (GNB), neutropenia, and bacteremia was studied in 45 bone marrow transplant recipients. Weekly stool cultures were prospectively monitored for GNB resistant to routine prophylactic and empiric antimicrobial agents. Seven cases of GNB bacteremia occurred in 45 patients described as follows. Twenty-three patients had no fecal or blood GNB. Fifteen patients had fecal GNB and no blood GNB; three of these latter patients had less than or equal to 50/mm3 circulating white blood cells (WBC) at the time of isolation of fecal GNB but two of the three were concurrently receiving appropriate empiric antibiotics. Two patients had blood GNB but no fecal GNB: one patient had a trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMZ)-sensitive isolate that would not be detectable in the feces by our methodology and one patient had feces analyzed only after the bacteremic event. Five patients had fecal GNB and blood GNB: one of these patients did not have a fecal sample analyzed prior to bacteremia but the remaining four patients had the same species/antibiogram of GNB isolated from the feces two to three days prior to the detection of bacteremia. Thus, the fecal GNB could have been used to predict the antibiogram of the subsequent blood GNB. In addition, all four of these latter bacteremic patients had less than or equal to 50/mm3 circulating WBC at the time of documented fecal GNB. Thus, bone marrow transplant recipients with fecal GNB coupled with severe neutropenia (less than or equal to 50/mm3 circulating WBC) were more likely to develop bacteremia (P less than 0.02) than were those with fecal GNB and greater than 50/mm3 circulating WBC.

在严重中性粒细胞减少症期间监测粪便培养的重要性。
本文对45例骨髓移植受者粪便革兰氏阴性杆菌(GNB)、中性粒细胞减少症和菌血症的相关性进行了研究。每周粪便培养前瞻性监测GNB对常规预防性和经验性抗菌药物的耐药性。45例患者中发生7例GNB菌血症,描述如下。23例患者粪便或血液中未发现GNB。15例患者有粪便GNB,无血液GNB;其中3例在分离粪便GNB时循环白细胞(WBC)小于或等于50/mm3,但其中2例同时接受了适当的经验性抗生素治疗。2例患者有血液GNB,但没有粪便GNB: 1例患者有甲氧苄啶/磺胺甲恶唑(TMP-SMZ)敏感分离物,我们的方法无法在粪便中检测到,1例患者仅在菌血症事件后才对粪便进行分析。5例患者患有粪便GNB和血液GNB:其中1例患者在发现菌血症前未对粪便样本进行分析,但其余4例患者在发现菌血症前2至3天从粪便中分离出相同种类/抗生素谱的GNB。因此,粪便GNB可以用来预测随后的血液GNB的抗生素谱。此外,在记录的粪便GNB时,所有这4例后一种菌血症患者的循环白细胞均小于或等于50/mm3。因此,与粪便GNB合并严重中性粒细胞减少(循环白细胞少于或等于50/mm3)的骨髓移植受者相比,粪便GNB合并循环白细胞大于50/mm3的骨髓移植受者更容易发生菌血症(P < 0.02)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信