Analgesic efficacy of continuous erector spinae plane block vs. opioid‐based regimen for postoperative pain management following video‐assisted thoracoscopic lung resection: a prospective, randomised, open‐label, non‐inferiority trial

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2025-06-23 DOI:10.1111/anae.16651
Junqiang Hu, Weichao Zhou, Xi Zheng, Anyu Zhang, Qiang Huang, Chunmei Zhang, Yonghua Yao, Dianyu Lu, Wei Wei
{"title":"Analgesic efficacy of continuous erector spinae plane block vs. opioid‐based regimen for postoperative pain management following video‐assisted thoracoscopic lung resection: a prospective, randomised, open‐label, non‐inferiority trial","authors":"Junqiang Hu, Weichao Zhou, Xi Zheng, Anyu Zhang, Qiang Huang, Chunmei Zhang, Yonghua Yao, Dianyu Lu, Wei Wei","doi":"10.1111/anae.16651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SummaryIntroductionVideo‐assisted thoracoscopic lung resection causes significant postoperative pain. We hypothesised that continuous erector spinae plane block would provide non‐inferior analgesia compared with a conventional opioid‐based regimen for this procedure.MethodsPatients were allocated randomly to continuous erector spinae plane block (continuous infusion of 0.25% ropivacaine via perineural catheters (5 ml.h<jats:sup>‐1</jats:sup>) combined with programmed intermittent bolus (10 ml every 6 h for the initial 24 h)) or conventional opioid‐based regimen (continuous infusion of opioid (2 μg.kg<jats:sup>‐1</jats:sup> sufentanil and 16 mg ondansetron diluted to 100 ml with 0.9% normal saline) at 2 ml.h<jats:sup>‐1</jats:sup> for 48 h). The primary outcome was overall analgesic efficacy with cough, quantified by the cumulative area under curve for the pain numeric rating scale scores, from post‐anaesthesia care unit discharge to 48 h postoperatively.ResultsThe cumulative area under curve for the pain numeric rating scale score in patients allocated to the continuous erector spinae plane block group was non‐inferior to those allocated to the conventional group (mean difference − 0.99, 95%CI ‐11.97–9.98, p = 0.011). Patients allocated to the continuous erector spinae plane block group showed superior quality of recovery‐15 scores at 24 h (median difference 11, 95%CI 6–16, p &lt; 0.001) and 48 h postoperatively (median difference 10, 95%CI 7–15, p &lt; 0.001), alongside reduced postoperative pulmonary complications (relative risk 0.45, 95%CI 0.21–0.96, p = 0.031). Safety outcomes favoured continuous erector spinae plane block, with lower incidences of postoperative nausea (relative risk 0.17, 95%CI 0.04–0.73, p = 0.005); retching (relative risk 0.11, 95%CI 0.02–0.89, p = 0.023); and dizziness (relative risk 0.22, 95%CI 0.07–0.72, p = 0.005).DiscussionFollowing video‐assisted thoracoscopic lung resection, continuous erector spinae plane block provides non‐inferior postoperative analgesia compared with conventional opioid‐based regimen whilst enhancing recovery quality significantly and reducing complications.","PeriodicalId":7742,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.16651","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

SummaryIntroductionVideo‐assisted thoracoscopic lung resection causes significant postoperative pain. We hypothesised that continuous erector spinae plane block would provide non‐inferior analgesia compared with a conventional opioid‐based regimen for this procedure.MethodsPatients were allocated randomly to continuous erector spinae plane block (continuous infusion of 0.25% ropivacaine via perineural catheters (5 ml.h‐1) combined with programmed intermittent bolus (10 ml every 6 h for the initial 24 h)) or conventional opioid‐based regimen (continuous infusion of opioid (2 μg.kg‐1 sufentanil and 16 mg ondansetron diluted to 100 ml with 0.9% normal saline) at 2 ml.h‐1 for 48 h). The primary outcome was overall analgesic efficacy with cough, quantified by the cumulative area under curve for the pain numeric rating scale scores, from post‐anaesthesia care unit discharge to 48 h postoperatively.ResultsThe cumulative area under curve for the pain numeric rating scale score in patients allocated to the continuous erector spinae plane block group was non‐inferior to those allocated to the conventional group (mean difference − 0.99, 95%CI ‐11.97–9.98, p = 0.011). Patients allocated to the continuous erector spinae plane block group showed superior quality of recovery‐15 scores at 24 h (median difference 11, 95%CI 6–16, p < 0.001) and 48 h postoperatively (median difference 10, 95%CI 7–15, p < 0.001), alongside reduced postoperative pulmonary complications (relative risk 0.45, 95%CI 0.21–0.96, p = 0.031). Safety outcomes favoured continuous erector spinae plane block, with lower incidences of postoperative nausea (relative risk 0.17, 95%CI 0.04–0.73, p = 0.005); retching (relative risk 0.11, 95%CI 0.02–0.89, p = 0.023); and dizziness (relative risk 0.22, 95%CI 0.07–0.72, p = 0.005).DiscussionFollowing video‐assisted thoracoscopic lung resection, continuous erector spinae plane block provides non‐inferior postoperative analgesia compared with conventional opioid‐based regimen whilst enhancing recovery quality significantly and reducing complications.
在视频辅助胸腔镜肺切除术后,连续竖脊肌平面阻滞与阿片类药物治疗方案的镇痛效果:一项前瞻性、随机、开放标签、非效性试验
视频辅助胸腔镜肺切除术引起明显的术后疼痛。我们假设与传统的基于阿片类药物的方案相比,连续竖肌脊柱平面阻滞可以提供非劣效性镇痛。方法将患者随机分配到连续勃起椎平面阻滞组(通过神经周导管连续输注0.25%罗哌卡因(5 ml.h‐1),并结合程序间歇给药(最初24 h每6 h 10 ml))或常规以阿片类药物为基础的方案(连续输注阿片类药物(2 μg。Kg‐1舒芬太尼和16 mg昂丹司琼用0.9%生理盐水稀释至100 ml) (2 ml.h‐1,48 h)。主要结果是咳嗽的整体镇痛效果,通过疼痛数字评定量表评分的累积曲线下面积来量化,从麻醉后护理单位出院到术后48小时。结果连续竖脊肌平面阻滞组疼痛数值评定量表评分曲线下累积面积不低于常规组(平均差异为- 0.99,95%CI - 11.97-9.98, p = 0.011)。分配到连续竖脊肌平面阻滞组的患者在24小时的恢复质量- 15评分较高(中位差为11,95%CI为6-16,p <;0.001)和术后48 h(中位差10,95%CI 7-15, p <;0.001),同时减少了术后肺部并发症(相对危险度0.45,95%CI 0.21-0.96, p = 0.031)。安全性结果支持连续直立者脊柱平面阻滞,术后恶心发生率较低(相对危险度0.17,95%CI 0.04-0.73, p = 0.005);干呕(相对危险度0.11,95%CI 0.02 ~ 0.89, p = 0.023);头晕(相对危险度0.22,95%CI 0.07-0.72, p = 0.005)。视频辅助胸腔镜肺切除术后,与传统的阿片类药物治疗方案相比,连续竖脊机脊柱平面阻滞提供了非逊色的术后镇痛,同时显著提高了恢复质量并减少了并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anaesthesia
Anaesthesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
21.20
自引率
9.30%
发文量
300
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of the Association of Anaesthetists is Anaesthesia. It is a comprehensive international publication that covers a wide range of topics. The journal focuses on general and regional anaesthesia, as well as intensive care and pain therapy. It includes original articles that have undergone peer review, covering all aspects of these fields, including research on equipment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信