Nina Capiro, Prasidda Khadka, James Sayre, Gelareh Sadigh, Anne Hoyt
{"title":"Effect of Fee Removal on the Use of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis to Minimize Health Care Disparities.","authors":"Nina Capiro, Prasidda Khadka, James Sayre, Gelareh Sadigh, Anne Hoyt","doi":"10.1016/j.jacr.2025.06.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>After FDA clearance of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) in 2011, many insurers were slow to adopt full coverage without cost sharing. Our institution implemented a $45 out-of-pocket fee for DBT, refunded upon insurance payment. This fee was eliminated in January 2021 after most insurers began covering DBT. We evaluated the effect of out-of-pocket fee removal on DBT versus digital mammography use across patient groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of screening mammograms scheduled at a multisite academic institution between March 2018 and August 2022. A difference-in-difference analysis was performed for women with screening mammography both before and after fee removal to assess the effect of fee removal across patient groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 13,284 women (mean age, 61.5 ± 11.2 years), DBT utilization increased from 83.7% (11,123 of 13,284) pre-intervention to 91.5% (12,256 of 13,284) postintervention. Relative to White patients, the rise in DBT utilization was greater by 5.0 percentage points (pp) for Asian patients (95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.7-6.2), 6.2 pp for Black patients (95% CI = 5.0-7.3), and 6.2 pp for Hispanic patients (95% CI = 4.9-7.5). Non-English-speaking patients had a larger increase in DBT usage than English-speaking patients (7.1 pp; 95% CI = 6.1-8.1). Medicaid (6.7 pp; 95% CI = 4.8-8.5) and commercially insured (5.1 pp; 95% CI = 3.8-6.4) patients showed a greater rise in DBT usage than patients with Medicare. Patients from more socio-economically disadvantaged areas had a greater increase in DBT utilization compared with those from less disadvantaged areas (5.2 pp; 95% CI = 4.1-6.8).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Eliminating out-of-pocket cost for DBT improved overall utilization and narrowed disparities. However, persistent inequities suggest additional strategies are needed to ensure equitable access to DBT for all women undergoing screening mammography.</p>","PeriodicalId":73968,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2025.06.022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: After FDA clearance of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) in 2011, many insurers were slow to adopt full coverage without cost sharing. Our institution implemented a $45 out-of-pocket fee for DBT, refunded upon insurance payment. This fee was eliminated in January 2021 after most insurers began covering DBT. We evaluated the effect of out-of-pocket fee removal on DBT versus digital mammography use across patient groups.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of screening mammograms scheduled at a multisite academic institution between March 2018 and August 2022. A difference-in-difference analysis was performed for women with screening mammography both before and after fee removal to assess the effect of fee removal across patient groups.
Results: Among 13,284 women (mean age, 61.5 ± 11.2 years), DBT utilization increased from 83.7% (11,123 of 13,284) pre-intervention to 91.5% (12,256 of 13,284) postintervention. Relative to White patients, the rise in DBT utilization was greater by 5.0 percentage points (pp) for Asian patients (95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.7-6.2), 6.2 pp for Black patients (95% CI = 5.0-7.3), and 6.2 pp for Hispanic patients (95% CI = 4.9-7.5). Non-English-speaking patients had a larger increase in DBT usage than English-speaking patients (7.1 pp; 95% CI = 6.1-8.1). Medicaid (6.7 pp; 95% CI = 4.8-8.5) and commercially insured (5.1 pp; 95% CI = 3.8-6.4) patients showed a greater rise in DBT usage than patients with Medicare. Patients from more socio-economically disadvantaged areas had a greater increase in DBT utilization compared with those from less disadvantaged areas (5.2 pp; 95% CI = 4.1-6.8).
Conclusion: Eliminating out-of-pocket cost for DBT improved overall utilization and narrowed disparities. However, persistent inequities suggest additional strategies are needed to ensure equitable access to DBT for all women undergoing screening mammography.