Patient-reported quality of outpatient healthcare in patients with chronic back or arthrosis pain with long-term opioid therapy in Germany.

IF 2.6 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Anja Niemann, Nils Frederik Schrader, Christian Speckemeier, Carina Abels, Nikola Blase, Milena Weitzel, Anja Neumann, Cordula Riederer, Joachim Nadstawek, Wolfgang Straßmeir, Jürgen Wasem, Silke Neusser
{"title":"Patient-reported quality of outpatient healthcare in patients with chronic back or arthrosis pain with long-term opioid therapy in Germany.","authors":"Anja Niemann, Nils Frederik Schrader, Christian Speckemeier, Carina Abels, Nikola Blase, Milena Weitzel, Anja Neumann, Cordula Riederer, Joachim Nadstawek, Wolfgang Straßmeir, Jürgen Wasem, Silke Neusser","doi":"10.1186/s12875-025-02881-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Managing patients with chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) in outpatient healthcare is challenging. Long-term opioid therapy is an option for treatment responders with guideline recommended indications. However, opioid use poses risks of severe side effects, including misuse, and therefore needs to be integrated into a high-quality healthcare process. This analysis evaluates the association between healthcare quality according to the evidence-based Chronic Care Model (CCM) in the treatment process of patients receiving long-term opioid therapy for chronic back and/or arthrosis pain, and patient-related or healthcare related variables.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional patient survey was sent to a random sample of 3,037 individuals with long-term opioid therapy and chronic back and/or arthrosis pain insured by a large nationwide German statutory health insurance. Healthcare quality according to the CCM was assessed by the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC-5A) questionnaire. Internal reliability of the assessment instrument was determined using Cronbach's α. Descriptive analysis of the outcome scales were conducted, alongside subgroup analyses considering patient characteristics, patient's health situation, and pain treatment aspects. Testing for statistical significance was performed by Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal-Wallis test. Effect sizes, namely Eta and Spearman's Rank correlation coefficient, were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 661 individuals. Participants were predominantly female (76%) with an average age of 69 years (SD 12.5). PACIC-5A score ratings across all (sub)scales were low, with a summary score rating of 2.4 (on a scale ranging from 1 (worst) to 5 (best)). Positive correlations with treatment quality were observed in the subgroup analysis concerning guideline-compliant pain treatment aspects such as setting therapy goals or a comprehensive treatment concept. Patient characteristics showed little to no correlations, except for a positive correlation between higher PACIC-5A rating and both lower age and higher education. Patient's health situation presented a mixed picture, with no clear correlation between pain intensity/impairment, and PACIC-5A scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The provision of healthcare for patients with long-term opioid therapy for CNCP seems to be inadequate according to the CCM. Guideline-recommended pain treatment aspects exhibited a positive correlation with healthcare quality according to CCM. Enhancing the implementation of the CCM in the outpatient healthcare process may improve healthcare quality.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00024854. Registered 04/28/2021.</p>","PeriodicalId":72428,"journal":{"name":"BMC primary care","volume":"26 1","pages":"200"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12181890/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-025-02881-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Managing patients with chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) in outpatient healthcare is challenging. Long-term opioid therapy is an option for treatment responders with guideline recommended indications. However, opioid use poses risks of severe side effects, including misuse, and therefore needs to be integrated into a high-quality healthcare process. This analysis evaluates the association between healthcare quality according to the evidence-based Chronic Care Model (CCM) in the treatment process of patients receiving long-term opioid therapy for chronic back and/or arthrosis pain, and patient-related or healthcare related variables.

Methods: A cross-sectional patient survey was sent to a random sample of 3,037 individuals with long-term opioid therapy and chronic back and/or arthrosis pain insured by a large nationwide German statutory health insurance. Healthcare quality according to the CCM was assessed by the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC-5A) questionnaire. Internal reliability of the assessment instrument was determined using Cronbach's α. Descriptive analysis of the outcome scales were conducted, alongside subgroup analyses considering patient characteristics, patient's health situation, and pain treatment aspects. Testing for statistical significance was performed by Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal-Wallis test. Effect sizes, namely Eta and Spearman's Rank correlation coefficient, were calculated.

Results: The analysis included 661 individuals. Participants were predominantly female (76%) with an average age of 69 years (SD 12.5). PACIC-5A score ratings across all (sub)scales were low, with a summary score rating of 2.4 (on a scale ranging from 1 (worst) to 5 (best)). Positive correlations with treatment quality were observed in the subgroup analysis concerning guideline-compliant pain treatment aspects such as setting therapy goals or a comprehensive treatment concept. Patient characteristics showed little to no correlations, except for a positive correlation between higher PACIC-5A rating and both lower age and higher education. Patient's health situation presented a mixed picture, with no clear correlation between pain intensity/impairment, and PACIC-5A scores.

Conclusions: The provision of healthcare for patients with long-term opioid therapy for CNCP seems to be inadequate according to the CCM. Guideline-recommended pain treatment aspects exhibited a positive correlation with healthcare quality according to CCM. Enhancing the implementation of the CCM in the outpatient healthcare process may improve healthcare quality.

Trial registration: German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00024854. Registered 04/28/2021.

在德国,长期阿片类药物治疗的慢性背部或关节疼痛患者报告的门诊保健质量。
背景:门诊治疗慢性非癌性疼痛(CNCP)患者具有挑战性。长期阿片类药物治疗是具有指南推荐适应症的治疗应答者的一种选择。然而,阿片类药物的使用会带来严重副作用的风险,包括滥用,因此需要纳入高质量的医疗保健流程。本分析根据循证慢性护理模型(CCM)评估在接受长期阿片类药物治疗慢性背部和/或关节疼痛的患者治疗过程中的医疗质量与患者相关或医疗相关变量之间的关联。方法:对3037名长期接受阿片类药物治疗和慢性背部和/或关节疼痛的患者进行横断面调查,这些患者参加了德国大型全国性法定健康保险。采用慢性疾病护理患者评估(PACIC-5A)问卷对CCM的医疗质量进行评估。采用Cronbach’s α测定评估工具的内部信度。对结果量表进行描述性分析,同时考虑患者特征、患者健康状况和疼痛治疗方面进行亚组分析。统计学显著性检验采用Mann-Whitney U检验和Kruskal-Wallis检验。计算效应量,即Eta和Spearman’s Rank相关系数。结果:共纳入661例个体。参与者主要为女性(76%),平均年龄为69岁(标准差12.5)。PACIC-5A评分在所有(子)量表上都很低,总评分为2.4(评分范围从1(最差)到5(最好))。在亚组分析中观察到治疗质量与指南依从性疼痛治疗方面的正相关,如设定治疗目标或综合治疗概念。除了PACIC-5A等级高与年龄低、教育程度高等呈正相关外,患者特征几乎没有相关性。患者的健康状况好坏参半,疼痛强度/损伤与PACIC-5A评分之间没有明确的相关性。结论:根据CCM,为长期阿片类药物治疗的CNCP患者提供的医疗保健似乎不足。根据CCM,指南推荐的疼痛治疗方面与医疗保健质量呈正相关。在门诊医疗过程中加强CCM的实施可以提高医疗质量。试验注册:德国临床试验注册,DRKS00024854。04/28/2021注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信