Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors and survival in patients with renal cell carcinoma: Evidence from a meta-analysis.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Hongyan Xi, Mingrui Zhao, Jinhai Shen
{"title":"Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors and survival in patients with renal cell carcinoma: Evidence from a meta-analysis.","authors":"Hongyan Xi, Mingrui Zhao, Jinhai Shen","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.05.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The therapeutic potential of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains controversial. This meta-analysis synthesizes existing evidence to elucidate the association between RASi use and survival outcomes in RCC patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Embase up to November 12, 2024, to identify studies that compared survival outcomes between users and non-users of RASi. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated using random-effects models. Subgroup analyses stratified by disease stage, treatment modality, and the type of RASi were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,263 records were initially screened. Twelve retrospective studies, encompassing 22 cohorts and a combined total of 22,630 patients, were included in the final analysis. The pooled analysis revealed that RASi use was significantly associated with improved OS (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.62-0.88) and PFS (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.62-0.89). Notably, in patients with metastatic disease, the use of RASi was linked to an even greater enhancement in OS (HR, 0.71; 0.58-0.87) and PFS (HR, 0.72; 95%CI, 0.60-0.87). Subgroup analyses stratified by treatment modality indicated concurrent use of RASi with targeted therapy (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.55-0.88) and immunotherapy (HR 0.55; 95% CI, 0.35-0.88) was associated with significantly improved OS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis suggests RASi as a potential adjunctive therapy in RCC management, particularly in patients with metastatic disease, and those who receive targeted therapy or immunotherapy. These findings highlight the potential therapeutic benefit of RASi in the management of RCC and warrant further investigation to establish its role in clinical practice guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.05.015","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The therapeutic potential of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains controversial. This meta-analysis synthesizes existing evidence to elucidate the association between RASi use and survival outcomes in RCC patients.

Methods: We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Embase up to November 12, 2024, to identify studies that compared survival outcomes between users and non-users of RASi. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated using random-effects models. Subgroup analyses stratified by disease stage, treatment modality, and the type of RASi were performed.

Results: A total of 1,263 records were initially screened. Twelve retrospective studies, encompassing 22 cohorts and a combined total of 22,630 patients, were included in the final analysis. The pooled analysis revealed that RASi use was significantly associated with improved OS (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.62-0.88) and PFS (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.62-0.89). Notably, in patients with metastatic disease, the use of RASi was linked to an even greater enhancement in OS (HR, 0.71; 0.58-0.87) and PFS (HR, 0.72; 95%CI, 0.60-0.87). Subgroup analyses stratified by treatment modality indicated concurrent use of RASi with targeted therapy (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.55-0.88) and immunotherapy (HR 0.55; 95% CI, 0.35-0.88) was associated with significantly improved OS.

Conclusion: This meta-analysis suggests RASi as a potential adjunctive therapy in RCC management, particularly in patients with metastatic disease, and those who receive targeted therapy or immunotherapy. These findings highlight the potential therapeutic benefit of RASi in the management of RCC and warrant further investigation to establish its role in clinical practice guidelines.

肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂和肾细胞癌患者的生存:来自荟萃分析的证据。
背景:肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂(RASi)在肾细胞癌(RCC)中的治疗潜力仍然存在争议。本荟萃分析综合了现有证据,阐明了RCC患者RASi使用与生存结果之间的关系。方法:我们对PubMed, Scopus和Embase进行了系统检索,截止到2024年11月12日,以确定比较RASi使用者和非使用者之间生存结果的研究。使用随机效应模型计算总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)的合并风险比(hr)和95%置信区间(ci)。按疾病分期、治疗方式和RASi类型分层进行亚组分析。结果:初步筛选了1263条记录。最终分析纳入了12项回顾性研究,包括22个队列和总计22,630例患者。合并分析显示,RASi的使用与OS的改善显著相关(HR, 0.74;95% CI, 0.62-0.88)和PFS (HR, 0.74;95% ci, 0.62-0.89)。值得注意的是,在转移性疾病患者中,RASi的使用与OS的更大增强相关(HR, 0.71;0.58-0.87)和PFS (HR, 0.72;95%可信区间,0.60 - -0.87)。按治疗方式分层的亚组分析显示,RASi与靶向治疗同时使用(HR, 0.69;95% CI, 0.55-0.88)和免疫治疗(HR 0.55;95% CI, 0.35-0.88)与OS的显著改善相关。结论:这项荟萃分析表明,RASi是RCC治疗的潜在辅助治疗,特别是对于转移性疾病患者,以及接受靶向治疗或免疫治疗的患者。这些发现强调了RASi在RCC治疗中的潜在治疗益处,值得进一步研究以确定其在临床实践指南中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
7.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations is the official journal of the Society of Urologic Oncology. The journal publishes practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science research articles which address any aspect of urologic oncology. Each issue comprises original research, news and topics, survey articles providing short commentaries on other important articles in the urologic oncology literature, and reviews including an in-depth Seminar examining a specific clinical dilemma. The journal periodically publishes supplement issues devoted to areas of current interest to the urologic oncology community. Articles published are of interest to researchers and the clinicians involved in the practice of urologic oncology including urologists, oncologists, and radiologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信