The Sparta Science force plate is reliable in assessment of recovery following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

IF 2.7 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
W.T. Wilson , J.A. Feller , H.J. Klemm , L.M. Batty , J.C. Kirby , K.E. Webster
{"title":"The Sparta Science force plate is reliable in assessment of recovery following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction","authors":"W.T. Wilson ,&nbsp;J.A. Feller ,&nbsp;H.J. Klemm ,&nbsp;L.M. Batty ,&nbsp;J.C. Kirby ,&nbsp;K.E. Webster","doi":"10.1016/j.jisako.2025.100917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The Sparta Science force plate provides kinetic information derived from movements such as vertical jump and balance tests. It has primarily been utilized to assess fitness amongst athletic and military populations. The outputs from this system may be useful in the assessment of return to sport (RTS) readiness following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The aim of this study was to determine the reliability of the Sparta Science metrics in ACL reconstruction patients and to compare these results with the healthy population data provided by the Sparta system.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Primary ACL reconstruction patients were recruited to undergo testing at 9 months postoperatively, excluding those with a history of ipsilateral or contralateral knee injury, or concomitant multiligament knee injury requiring surgery. Testing included knee laxity assessment, hop tests, isokinetic strength testing using a dynamometer, and then kinetic measures using the Sparta force plate. The force plate assessed double- and single-leg vertical jump and balance tasks, with each test performed twice after a 5-min rest. Metrics analyzed were jump height and Sparta-derived jump profiles and balance scores. Sparta-derived t-scores were used to compare against the population average for each test. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated to determine relative reliability.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were 74 patients, 44 (60%) males, mean age 25(±9) years, with mean pre-injury Marx scale 13.1(±3.4). The Sparta Science metrics showed moderate to excellent reliability for double-leg (ICC: 0.75-0.97) and single-leg vertical jump (ICC: 0.81-0.95), as well as balance assessments (ICC: 0.71-0.81). Patients scored lower than the healthy population norms for vertical jump tests but greater for balance tests. The jump test scores were significantly correlated with hop tests and quadriceps and hamstring strength.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The Sparta Science force plate is reliable when assessing patients after ACL reconstruction with ICCs showing moderate to excellent reliability. We identified kinetic deficiencies in vertical jump test performance and the results correlate with other return to sport testing methods. This demonstrates the Sparta system’s potential as a reliable option to augment traditional testing methods.</div></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><div>III.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36847,"journal":{"name":"Journal of ISAKOS Joint Disorders & Orthopaedic Sports Medicine","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100917"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of ISAKOS Joint Disorders & Orthopaedic Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2059775425005346","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The Sparta Science force plate provides kinetic information derived from movements such as vertical jump and balance tests. It has primarily been utilized to assess fitness amongst athletic and military populations. The outputs from this system may be useful in the assessment of return to sport (RTS) readiness following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The aim of this study was to determine the reliability of the Sparta Science metrics in ACL reconstruction patients and to compare these results with the healthy population data provided by the Sparta system.

Methods

Primary ACL reconstruction patients were recruited to undergo testing at 9 months postoperatively, excluding those with a history of ipsilateral or contralateral knee injury, or concomitant multiligament knee injury requiring surgery. Testing included knee laxity assessment, hop tests, isokinetic strength testing using a dynamometer, and then kinetic measures using the Sparta force plate. The force plate assessed double- and single-leg vertical jump and balance tasks, with each test performed twice after a 5-min rest. Metrics analyzed were jump height and Sparta-derived jump profiles and balance scores. Sparta-derived t-scores were used to compare against the population average for each test. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated to determine relative reliability.

Results

There were 74 patients, 44 (60%) males, mean age 25(±9) years, with mean pre-injury Marx scale 13.1(±3.4). The Sparta Science metrics showed moderate to excellent reliability for double-leg (ICC: 0.75-0.97) and single-leg vertical jump (ICC: 0.81-0.95), as well as balance assessments (ICC: 0.71-0.81). Patients scored lower than the healthy population norms for vertical jump tests but greater for balance tests. The jump test scores were significantly correlated with hop tests and quadriceps and hamstring strength.

Conclusion

The Sparta Science force plate is reliable when assessing patients after ACL reconstruction with ICCs showing moderate to excellent reliability. We identified kinetic deficiencies in vertical jump test performance and the results correlate with other return to sport testing methods. This demonstrates the Sparta system’s potential as a reliable option to augment traditional testing methods.

Level of Evidence

III.
斯巴达科学力板是评估前交叉韧带重建后恢复情况的可靠方法。
简介:斯巴达科学力板提供来自运动的动力学信息,如垂直跳跃和平衡测试。它主要用于评估运动员和军人的健康状况。该系统的输出可用于评估前交叉韧带(ACL)重建后重返运动(RTS)准备情况。本研究的目的是确定前交叉韧带重建患者的斯巴达科学指标的可靠性,并将这些结果与斯巴达系统提供的健康人群数据进行比较。方法:招募原发性前交叉韧带重建患者,在术后9个月进行测试,排除有同侧或对侧膝关节损伤史的患者,或伴有需要手术的膝关节多韧带损伤的患者。测试包括膝关节松弛度评估、跳跃测试、使用测力计进行等速强度测试,然后使用斯巴达力板进行动力学测量。力板评估双腿和单腿垂直跳跃和平衡任务,每个测试在休息5分钟后进行两次。分析的指标是跳跃高度和斯巴达衍生的跳跃轮廓和平衡分数。使用斯巴达衍生的t分数与每次测试的总体平均值进行比较。计算类内相关系数(ICCs)以确定相对信度。结果:74例患者中,男性44例(60%),平均年龄25(±9)岁,平均伤前Marx评分13.1(±3.4)分。Sparta Science指标显示,双腿(ICC 0.75-0.97)和单腿垂直跳跃(ICC 0.81-0.95)以及平衡评估(ICC 0.71-0.81)的可靠性中等至优异。患者在垂直跳跃测试中的得分低于健康人群的标准,但在平衡测试中的得分更高。跳跃测试得分与跳跃测试和股四头肌和腘绳肌力量显著相关。结论:Sparta Science力板在评估ICCs重建ACL患者时是可靠的,具有中等到极好的可靠性。我们确定了垂直跳跃测试性能的动力学缺陷,结果与其他回归运动测试相关。这证明了Sparta系统作为传统测试方法的一种可靠选择的潜力。证据水平:III。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
61
审稿时长
108 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信