Effectiveness of education on radiation exposure for medical students prior to clinical clerkship.

IF 2.1 4区 医学
Japanese Journal of Radiology Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-21 DOI:10.1007/s11604-025-01815-4
Satoshi Yamauchi, Kaede Kido, Ryosuke Taiji, Tomoko Ochi, Chisa Yoneima, Yuto Chanoki, Keisuke Oshima, Kohei Wakatsuki, Toshihiro Tanaka
{"title":"Effectiveness of education on radiation exposure for medical students prior to clinical clerkship.","authors":"Satoshi Yamauchi, Kaede Kido, Ryosuke Taiji, Tomoko Ochi, Chisa Yoneima, Yuto Chanoki, Keisuke Oshima, Kohei Wakatsuki, Toshihiro Tanaka","doi":"10.1007/s11604-025-01815-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The widespread use of radiation in diagnostic imaging, interventional procedures, and radiotherapy requires robust radiation safety education. Despite its importance, medical students in Japan and other countries have limited awareness of radiation protection. In Japan, radiation safety education is essential due to recent legislative changes that position medical students as \"student doctors\" and expand their clinical responsibilities. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the knowledge, concerns, and anxieties of 5th-year medical students regarding radiation exposure before clinical training, and to evaluate the impact of a lecture-style intervention on these parameters.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A 20-min lecture on radiation safety was given to 95 fifth-year students at Nara Medical University immediately before clinical training. The lecture covered the basic concepts of radiation biology, legal regulations, radiation risks, and protective measures. A 25-item questionnaire using a five-point Likert scale was administered before and after the lecture. Exploratory factor analysis was conducted on the data, and mixed-design analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to evaluate changes in the main factors identified by exploratory factor analysis. Subgroup analysis was also conducted based on gender and the selected clinical department.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Exploratory factor analysis identified four main factors: anxiety, interest, knowledge, and management of radiation exposure. After the lecture-based intervention, knowledge and management of radiation exposure scores increased significantly (p < .001), but interest did not change. There was no difference in score by gender.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lecture-based interventions can significantly improve senior medical students' knowledge and management skills regarding radiation safety. However, it was difficult to improve the interest of students who chose departments that were considered to have a low risk of radiation exposure. Our findings indicate the need for further development of educational strategies to improve awareness and education of radiation protection in clinical situations.</p>","PeriodicalId":14691,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"1716-1724"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12479610/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-025-01815-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The widespread use of radiation in diagnostic imaging, interventional procedures, and radiotherapy requires robust radiation safety education. Despite its importance, medical students in Japan and other countries have limited awareness of radiation protection. In Japan, radiation safety education is essential due to recent legislative changes that position medical students as "student doctors" and expand their clinical responsibilities. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the knowledge, concerns, and anxieties of 5th-year medical students regarding radiation exposure before clinical training, and to evaluate the impact of a lecture-style intervention on these parameters.

Materials and methods: A 20-min lecture on radiation safety was given to 95 fifth-year students at Nara Medical University immediately before clinical training. The lecture covered the basic concepts of radiation biology, legal regulations, radiation risks, and protective measures. A 25-item questionnaire using a five-point Likert scale was administered before and after the lecture. Exploratory factor analysis was conducted on the data, and mixed-design analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to evaluate changes in the main factors identified by exploratory factor analysis. Subgroup analysis was also conducted based on gender and the selected clinical department.

Results: Exploratory factor analysis identified four main factors: anxiety, interest, knowledge, and management of radiation exposure. After the lecture-based intervention, knowledge and management of radiation exposure scores increased significantly (p < .001), but interest did not change. There was no difference in score by gender.

Conclusion: Lecture-based interventions can significantly improve senior medical students' knowledge and management skills regarding radiation safety. However, it was difficult to improve the interest of students who chose departments that were considered to have a low risk of radiation exposure. Our findings indicate the need for further development of educational strategies to improve awareness and education of radiation protection in clinical situations.

医学生临床实习前辐射照射教育的效果。
目的:辐射在诊断成像、介入手术和放疗中的广泛应用需要强有力的辐射安全教育。尽管它很重要,但日本和其他国家的医科学生对辐射防护的认识有限。在日本,辐射安全教育至关重要,因为最近的立法变化将医科学生定位为“实习医生”,并扩大了他们的临床责任。本研究旨在评估医学生在临床训练前对辐射暴露的认知、关注和焦虑,并评估讲座式干预对这些参数的影响。材料和方法:在临床培训之前,对奈良医科大学95名五年级学生进行了20分钟的辐射安全讲座。讲座内容包括辐射生物学的基本概念、法例、辐射风险及防护措施。在讲座前后分别使用李克特五点量表进行了25项问卷调查。对数据进行探索性因子分析,并采用混合设计方差分析(ANOVA)对探索性因子分析确定的主要因子的变化进行评价。并根据性别及所选临床科室进行亚组分析。结果:探索性因素分析确定了四个主要因素:焦虑、兴趣、知识和辐射照射管理。讲座型干预后,辐射暴露知识和管理得分显著增加(p < 0.001),但兴趣没有变化。性别之间的得分没有差异。结论:授课式干预能显著提高医学生辐射安全知识和管理技能。然而,对于那些选择被认为辐射暴露风险较低的院系的学生来说,很难提高他们的兴趣。我们的研究结果表明,需要进一步发展教育策略,以提高临床情况下的辐射防护意识和教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Japanese Journal of Radiology
Japanese Journal of Radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
自引率
4.80%
发文量
133
期刊介绍: Japanese Journal of Radiology is a peer-reviewed journal, officially published by the Japan Radiological Society. The main purpose of the journal is to provide a forum for the publication of papers documenting recent advances and new developments in the field of radiology in medicine and biology. The scope of Japanese Journal of Radiology encompasses but is not restricted to diagnostic radiology, interventional radiology, radiation oncology, nuclear medicine, radiation physics, and radiation biology. Additionally, the journal covers technical and industrial innovations. The journal welcomes original articles, technical notes, review articles, pictorial essays and letters to the editor. The journal also provides announcements from the boards and the committees of the society. Membership in the Japan Radiological Society is not a prerequisite for submission. Contributions are welcomed from all parts of the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信