Unpacking copyright infringement issues in the GenAI development lifecycle and a peek into the future

IF 3.3 3区 社会学 Q1 LAW
Cheng L. SAW, Bryan Zhi Yang TAN
{"title":"Unpacking copyright infringement issues in the GenAI development lifecycle and a peek into the future","authors":"Cheng L. SAW,&nbsp;Bryan Zhi Yang TAN","doi":"10.1016/j.clsr.2025.106163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Generative AI (“GAI”) refers to deep learning models that ingest input data and “learn” to produce output that mimics such data when duly prompted. This feature, however, has given rise to numerous claims of infringement by the owners of copyright in the training material. Relevantly, three questions have emerged for the law of copyright: (1) whether <em>prima facie</em> acts of infringement are disclosed at each stage of the GAI development lifecycle; (2) whether such acts fall within the scope of the text and data mining (“TDM”) exceptions; and (3) whether (and, if so, how successfully) the fair use exception may be invoked by GAI developers as a defence to infringement claims. This paper critically examines these questions in turn and considers, in particular, their interplay with the so-called “memorisation” phenomenon. It is argued that although infringing acts might occur in the process of downloading in-copyright training material and training the GAI model in question, TDM and fair use exceptions (where available) may yet exonerate developers from copyright liability under the right conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51516,"journal":{"name":"Computer Law & Security Review","volume":"58 ","pages":"Article 106163"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Law & Security Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212473X25000367","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Generative AI (“GAI”) refers to deep learning models that ingest input data and “learn” to produce output that mimics such data when duly prompted. This feature, however, has given rise to numerous claims of infringement by the owners of copyright in the training material. Relevantly, three questions have emerged for the law of copyright: (1) whether prima facie acts of infringement are disclosed at each stage of the GAI development lifecycle; (2) whether such acts fall within the scope of the text and data mining (“TDM”) exceptions; and (3) whether (and, if so, how successfully) the fair use exception may be invoked by GAI developers as a defence to infringement claims. This paper critically examines these questions in turn and considers, in particular, their interplay with the so-called “memorisation” phenomenon. It is argued that although infringing acts might occur in the process of downloading in-copyright training material and training the GAI model in question, TDM and fair use exceptions (where available) may yet exonerate developers from copyright liability under the right conditions.
解析GenAI开发生命周期中的版权侵权问题,并展望未来
生成式人工智能(“GAI”)指的是深度学习模型,它摄取输入数据,并在适当提示时“学习”产生模仿这些数据的输出。然而,这一特点引起了培训材料版权所有人提出的许多侵权索赔。与此相关,著作权法出现了三个问题:(1)是否在GAI开发生命周期的每个阶段都披露了初步侵权行为;(2)这些行为是否属于文本和数据挖掘(“TDM”)例外的范围;(3) GAI开发者是否(以及,如果是,如何成功地)援引合理使用例外作为侵权索赔的辩护。本文依次批判性地考察了这些问题,并特别考虑了它们与所谓的“记忆”现象的相互作用。有人认为,尽管侵权行为可能发生在下载有版权的培训材料和培训GAI模型的过程中,但在适当的条件下,TDM和合理使用例外(如果有的话)可能会免除开发者的版权责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
10.30%
发文量
81
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: CLSR publishes refereed academic and practitioner papers on topics such as Web 2.0, IT security, Identity management, ID cards, RFID, interference with privacy, Internet law, telecoms regulation, online broadcasting, intellectual property, software law, e-commerce, outsourcing, data protection, EU policy, freedom of information, computer security and many other topics. In addition it provides a regular update on European Union developments, national news from more than 20 jurisdictions in both Europe and the Pacific Rim. It is looking for papers within the subject area that display good quality legal analysis and new lines of legal thought or policy development that go beyond mere description of the subject area, however accurate that may be.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信