Predictors and clinical implications of emotional distress on the day of discharge in hospitalized patients

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Tzu-Ching Hung , Li-Ying Lin
{"title":"Predictors and clinical implications of emotional distress on the day of discharge in hospitalized patients","authors":"Tzu-Ching Hung ,&nbsp;Li-Ying Lin","doi":"10.1016/j.apnr.2025.151978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Emotional distress significantly affects the quality of life and mental health of hospitalized patients after discharge. This study aimed to identify key predictors of emotional distress on discharge day to inform clinical interventions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A descriptive correlational design was employed, retrospectively analyzing the medical records of 73,814 inpatients from a medical center in southern Taiwan over two years and four months, encompassing 471,339 person-days of emotional distress assessments.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The prevalence of emotional distress on discharge day was 73.1 %. Emotional distress on discharge day was positively correlated with age, hospital stay length, pain levels, and emotional distress on admission and during hospitalization. Women reported significantly higher emotional distress levels than men. Internal medicine patients exhibited significantly higher emotional distress levels compared to surgical and gynecological patients, while gynecological patients reported higher levels than surgical patients. Multivariate regression analysis identified seven significant predictors of emotional distress on the day of discharge: emotional distress on the day of admission (B = 0.470), internal medicine vs. surgery (B = 0.260), pain levels on the day of discharge (B = 0.110), age (B = 0.002), gynecology vs. surgery (B = 0.125), male vs. female gender (B = −0.038), and emotional distress during hospitalization (B = 0.012), all of which were statistically significant (p &lt; .001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Addressing emotional distress during hospitalization is essential to mitigating its persistence at discharge. Interventions should prioritize effective pain management, gender-sensitive care, and disease-specific strategies to enhance post-discharge quality of life and reduce the risk of readmission.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50740,"journal":{"name":"Applied Nursing Research","volume":"84 ","pages":"Article 151978"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0897189725000801","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Emotional distress significantly affects the quality of life and mental health of hospitalized patients after discharge. This study aimed to identify key predictors of emotional distress on discharge day to inform clinical interventions.

Methods

A descriptive correlational design was employed, retrospectively analyzing the medical records of 73,814 inpatients from a medical center in southern Taiwan over two years and four months, encompassing 471,339 person-days of emotional distress assessments.

Results

The prevalence of emotional distress on discharge day was 73.1 %. Emotional distress on discharge day was positively correlated with age, hospital stay length, pain levels, and emotional distress on admission and during hospitalization. Women reported significantly higher emotional distress levels than men. Internal medicine patients exhibited significantly higher emotional distress levels compared to surgical and gynecological patients, while gynecological patients reported higher levels than surgical patients. Multivariate regression analysis identified seven significant predictors of emotional distress on the day of discharge: emotional distress on the day of admission (B = 0.470), internal medicine vs. surgery (B = 0.260), pain levels on the day of discharge (B = 0.110), age (B = 0.002), gynecology vs. surgery (B = 0.125), male vs. female gender (B = −0.038), and emotional distress during hospitalization (B = 0.012), all of which were statistically significant (p < .001).

Conclusion

Addressing emotional distress during hospitalization is essential to mitigating its persistence at discharge. Interventions should prioritize effective pain management, gender-sensitive care, and disease-specific strategies to enhance post-discharge quality of life and reduce the risk of readmission.
住院患者出院当天情绪困扰的预测因素及临床意义
目的情绪困扰显著影响住院患者出院后的生活质量和心理健康。本研究旨在找出出院当天情绪困扰的主要预测因素,为临床干预提供依据。方法采用描述性相关设计,回顾性分析台湾南部某医疗中心73,814名住院患者2年零4个月的病历资料,其中包括471,339人日的情绪困扰评估。结果出院当天情绪困扰发生率为73.1%。出院当天的情绪困扰与年龄、住院时间、疼痛程度、入院及住院期间的情绪困扰呈正相关。女性报告的情绪困扰程度明显高于男性。内科患者的情绪困扰水平明显高于外科和妇科患者,而妇科患者的情绪困扰水平高于外科患者。多因素回归分析发现出院当天情绪困扰的7个显著预测因子:入院当天情绪困扰(B = 0.470)、内科与外科(B = 0.260)、出院当天疼痛程度(B = 0.110)、年龄(B = 0.002)、妇科与外科(B = 0.125)、男性与女性(B = - 0.038)、住院期间情绪困扰(B = 0.012),均有统计学意义(p <;措施)。结论治疗住院期间的情绪困扰是缓解出院时持续存在情绪困扰的关键。干预措施应优先考虑有效的疼痛管理、性别敏感护理和疾病特异性策略,以提高出院后的生活质量并降低再入院风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Nursing Research
Applied Nursing Research 医学-护理
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: Applied Nursing Research presents original, peer-reviewed research findings clearly and directly for clinical applications in all nursing specialties. Regular features include "Ask the Experts," research briefs, clinical methods, book reviews, news and announcements, and an editorial section. Applied Nursing Research covers such areas as pain management, patient education, discharge planning, nursing diagnosis, job stress in nursing, nursing influence on length of hospital stay, and nurse/physician collaboration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信