Perioperative Quality Initiative consensus statement recommendations on the definition, development, implementation and outcomes of pre-operative surgery schools.

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2025-06-21 DOI:10.1111/anae.16648
Imogen Fecher-Jones,Ben Ainsworth,Tong J Gan,S Ramani Moonesinghe,Andrew D Shaw,Michael P W Grocott,Denny Z H Levett,
{"title":"Perioperative Quality Initiative consensus statement recommendations on the definition, development, implementation and outcomes of pre-operative surgery schools.","authors":"Imogen Fecher-Jones,Ben Ainsworth,Tong J Gan,S Ramani Moonesinghe,Andrew D Shaw,Michael P W Grocott,Denny Z H Levett,","doi":"10.1111/anae.16648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\r\nPre-operative group sessions incorporating patient education and behaviour change interventions, known as 'surgery schools', are becoming increasingly common before major elective surgery across the world. However, there is a lack of conclusive evidence regarding the effectiveness of surgery schools, and the development and delivery of these complex interventions lacks standardisation.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nIn collaboration with the Perioperative Quality Initiative, we aimed to develop evidence- and expertise-based consensus statements and recommendations regarding the definition, design, content, and outcomes of surgery schools. Thirty-two international multidisciplinary experts in surgery school and pre-operative preparation attended a series of virtual meetings based on a modified Delphi methodology. A systematic review and additional targeted literature searches were used to propose statements for the definition, design, content and outcomes of surgery schools. Statements and recommendations were discussed iteratively and refined in multiple rounds, until agreement was reached.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nConsensus was reached on a definition of surgery school, as well as three statements and 18 recommendations in relation to: scope; outcomes; intervention development; delivery; inclusivity; and educational content of surgery schools. Seventeen areas were highlighted as priorities for future research.\r\n\r\nDISCUSSION\r\nThese consensus statements and recommendations are intended to help clinicians and service managers who plan to develop and implement surgery schools. They may improve the quality of those programmes and help to standardise their content. We also hope that this work will influence government strategy and policy in relation to the design, delivery and funding of peri-operative optimisation pathways.","PeriodicalId":7742,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.16648","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Pre-operative group sessions incorporating patient education and behaviour change interventions, known as 'surgery schools', are becoming increasingly common before major elective surgery across the world. However, there is a lack of conclusive evidence regarding the effectiveness of surgery schools, and the development and delivery of these complex interventions lacks standardisation. METHODS In collaboration with the Perioperative Quality Initiative, we aimed to develop evidence- and expertise-based consensus statements and recommendations regarding the definition, design, content, and outcomes of surgery schools. Thirty-two international multidisciplinary experts in surgery school and pre-operative preparation attended a series of virtual meetings based on a modified Delphi methodology. A systematic review and additional targeted literature searches were used to propose statements for the definition, design, content and outcomes of surgery schools. Statements and recommendations were discussed iteratively and refined in multiple rounds, until agreement was reached. RESULTS Consensus was reached on a definition of surgery school, as well as three statements and 18 recommendations in relation to: scope; outcomes; intervention development; delivery; inclusivity; and educational content of surgery schools. Seventeen areas were highlighted as priorities for future research. DISCUSSION These consensus statements and recommendations are intended to help clinicians and service managers who plan to develop and implement surgery schools. They may improve the quality of those programmes and help to standardise their content. We also hope that this work will influence government strategy and policy in relation to the design, delivery and funding of peri-operative optimisation pathways.
围手术期质量倡议共识声明,关于术前外科学校的定义、发展、实施和结果的建议。
前言术前小组会议结合患者教育和行为改变干预,被称为“手术学校”,在世界各地的重大选择性手术前变得越来越普遍。然而,关于外科学校的有效性缺乏确凿的证据,并且这些复杂干预措施的开发和交付缺乏标准化。方法与围手术期质量倡议合作,我们旨在就外科学校的定义、设计、内容和结果制定基于证据和专业知识的共识声明和建议。32位来自外科学校和术前准备的国际多学科专家参加了一系列基于改进的德尔菲方法的虚拟会议。系统回顾和额外的有针对性的文献检索被用来提出对外科学校的定义、设计、内容和结果的陈述。声明和建议经过多次反复讨论和改进,直到达成协议。结果对外科学派的定义达成了共识,并就以下方面提出了三点陈述和18条建议:范围;结果;干预的发展;交付;包容性;以及外科学校的教育内容。17个领域被强调为未来研究的优先事项。这些共识声明和建议旨在帮助计划发展和实施外科学校的临床医生和服务经理。它们可能会提高这些节目的质量,并有助于使其内容标准化。我们也希望这项工作能够影响政府在围手术期优化路径的设计、交付和资金方面的战略和政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anaesthesia
Anaesthesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
21.20
自引率
9.30%
发文量
300
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of the Association of Anaesthetists is Anaesthesia. It is a comprehensive international publication that covers a wide range of topics. The journal focuses on general and regional anaesthesia, as well as intensive care and pain therapy. It includes original articles that have undergone peer review, covering all aspects of these fields, including research on equipment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信