Quantification of Breast Arterial Calcification in Mammograms Using a UNet-Based Deep Learning for Detecting Cardiovascular Disease.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Wenbo Li, Qiyu Zhang, Dale Black, Huanjun Ding, Carlos Iribarren, Alireza Shojazadeh, Sabee Molloi
{"title":"Quantification of Breast Arterial Calcification in Mammograms Using a UNet-Based Deep Learning for Detecting Cardiovascular Disease.","authors":"Wenbo Li, Qiyu Zhang, Dale Black, Huanjun Ding, Carlos Iribarren, Alireza Shojazadeh, Sabee Molloi","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2025.05.036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast arterial calcification (BAC) is increasingly recognized as a significant indicator of cardiovascular risk, necessitating improvements in detection and quantification methods through mammographic screening.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To develop and validate a deep-learning model capable of detecting, segmenting, and quantifying BAC in mammograms, improving mammographic screening for cardiovascular risk assessment.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective study using mammograms from 369 patients. The study utilized a modified U-Net architecture that incorporates Hausdorff loss, Dice loss, and Binary Cross-Entropy (BCE) loss for segmentation and subsequent quantification. The model's performance was assessed using the Dice score, BCE loss for segmentation accuracy, linear fit, and Bland-Altman analysis for quantification accuracy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our model achieved high segmentation accuracy with Dice scores of 0.90 for the training set and 0.89 for the validation set. Quantification reliability was validated through Bland-Altman analysis, showing a mean difference of -0.98 mg of calcium in the training set. The model also demonstrated high classification accuracy with F1 scores of 0.97 and 0.93 for validation and training sets, respectively, in BAC detection.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The deep-learning framework substantially improves BAC detection, segmentation, and quantification in mammograms, advancing the accuracy and efficiency of cardiovascular risk screening. This study supports the potential for integrated dual-purpose screening in women's healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2025.05.036","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Breast arterial calcification (BAC) is increasingly recognized as a significant indicator of cardiovascular risk, necessitating improvements in detection and quantification methods through mammographic screening.

Purpose: To develop and validate a deep-learning model capable of detecting, segmenting, and quantifying BAC in mammograms, improving mammographic screening for cardiovascular risk assessment.

Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective study using mammograms from 369 patients. The study utilized a modified U-Net architecture that incorporates Hausdorff loss, Dice loss, and Binary Cross-Entropy (BCE) loss for segmentation and subsequent quantification. The model's performance was assessed using the Dice score, BCE loss for segmentation accuracy, linear fit, and Bland-Altman analysis for quantification accuracy.

Results: Our model achieved high segmentation accuracy with Dice scores of 0.90 for the training set and 0.89 for the validation set. Quantification reliability was validated through Bland-Altman analysis, showing a mean difference of -0.98 mg of calcium in the training set. The model also demonstrated high classification accuracy with F1 scores of 0.97 and 0.93 for validation and training sets, respectively, in BAC detection.

Conclusion: The deep-learning framework substantially improves BAC detection, segmentation, and quantification in mammograms, advancing the accuracy and efficiency of cardiovascular risk screening. This study supports the potential for integrated dual-purpose screening in women's healthcare.

使用基于unet的深度学习检测心血管疾病的乳房x光片中乳腺动脉钙化的量化。
背景:乳腺动脉钙化(BAC)越来越被认为是心血管风险的重要指标,需要通过乳房x线摄影筛查改进检测和量化方法。目的:开发并验证一种深度学习模型,该模型能够检测、分割和量化乳房x线照片中的BAC,从而改善乳房x线照片筛查对心血管风险评估的影响。材料和方法:我们利用369例患者的乳房x线照片进行回顾性研究。该研究利用了一种改进的U-Net架构,该架构结合了Hausdorff损失、Dice损失和二进制交叉熵(BCE)损失,用于分割和随后的量化。使用Dice评分、BCE损失(分割精度)、线性拟合和Bland-Altman分析(量化精度)来评估模型的性能。结果:我们的模型获得了很高的分割精度,训练集的Dice得分为0.90,验证集的Dice得分为0.89。通过Bland-Altman分析验证量化信度,显示训练集中钙的平均差异为-0.98 mg。该模型在BAC检测中也表现出较高的分类准确率,验证集和训练集的F1得分分别为0.97和0.93。结论:深度学习框架大大改善了乳腺x线检查中BAC的检测、分割和量化,提高了心血管风险筛查的准确性和效率。这项研究支持在妇女保健中进行综合双重目的筛查的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Academic Radiology
Academic Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
432
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Academic Radiology publishes original reports of clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, image-guided interventions and related techniques. It also includes brief technical reports describing original observations, techniques, and instrumental developments; state-of-the-art reports on clinical issues, new technology and other topics of current medical importance; meta-analyses; scientific studies and opinions on radiologic education; and letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信