Towards elimination: Challenges in community participation to a gHAT 'screen and treat' strategy using the new oral drug acoziborole in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 PARASITOLOGY
Catiane Vander Kelen, Alain Mpanya, Ruth Nzuzi, Gérard Watakembi, Cathy Mbuyi, Elena Nicco, Epco Hasker
{"title":"Towards elimination: Challenges in community participation to a gHAT 'screen and treat' strategy using the new oral drug acoziborole in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.","authors":"Catiane Vander Kelen, Alain Mpanya, Ruth Nzuzi, Gérard Watakembi, Cathy Mbuyi, Elena Nicco, Epco Hasker","doi":"10.1371/journal.pntd.0013197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Until recently, treatment options for gambiense human African trypanosomiasis (gHAT) have been limited and toxic, negatively impacting community participation to screening and treatment. A new, non-toxic, single-dose oral drug has shown efficacy in a Phase III trial and is being tested in a trial called 'STROGHAT', which aims to demonstrate cessation of HAT transmission using a 'screen and treat' strategy. This study aims to explore community perceptions about current and future screening and treatment strategies and identify what could act as barriers to participation in order to prevent them. We conducted 8 focus group discussions and 18 semi-structured interviews with communities, community leaders and mobile unit managers in 4 selected villages out of 74 endemic villages included in the STROGHAT study. Our results highlight four main potential barriers: the rarity of cases has led to gHAT being perceived as a disease that no longer exists and participation to screening as a waste of time. Lack of awareness of new treatment and screening procedures perpetuates fears and misconceptions about treatment toxicity, lumbar puncture and mandatory hospitalisation. The introduction of a single-dose oral drug to be administered on the spot raised the issue of side effect monitoring and care. Finally, the lack of sensitivity to community cultural norms in the organisation of screening discourages people from participating. Those barriers are important to anticipate and include in elimination strategy. Also a monitor perception about acoziborole screen and treat during all the process through other social science based research is to foreseen.</p>","PeriodicalId":49000,"journal":{"name":"PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases","volume":"19 6","pages":"e0013197"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0013197","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PARASITOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Until recently, treatment options for gambiense human African trypanosomiasis (gHAT) have been limited and toxic, negatively impacting community participation to screening and treatment. A new, non-toxic, single-dose oral drug has shown efficacy in a Phase III trial and is being tested in a trial called 'STROGHAT', which aims to demonstrate cessation of HAT transmission using a 'screen and treat' strategy. This study aims to explore community perceptions about current and future screening and treatment strategies and identify what could act as barriers to participation in order to prevent them. We conducted 8 focus group discussions and 18 semi-structured interviews with communities, community leaders and mobile unit managers in 4 selected villages out of 74 endemic villages included in the STROGHAT study. Our results highlight four main potential barriers: the rarity of cases has led to gHAT being perceived as a disease that no longer exists and participation to screening as a waste of time. Lack of awareness of new treatment and screening procedures perpetuates fears and misconceptions about treatment toxicity, lumbar puncture and mandatory hospitalisation. The introduction of a single-dose oral drug to be administered on the spot raised the issue of side effect monitoring and care. Finally, the lack of sensitivity to community cultural norms in the organisation of screening discourages people from participating. Those barriers are important to anticipate and include in elimination strategy. Also a monitor perception about acoziborole screen and treat during all the process through other social science based research is to foreseen.

走向消除:在刚果民主共和国,社区参与使用新型口服药物阿科兹波罗尔的gHAT“筛查和治疗”战略方面面临的挑战。
直到最近,冈比亚型非洲人类锥虫病(gHAT)的治疗选择一直有限且有毒性,对社区参与筛查和治疗产生了负面影响。一种新的无毒单剂量口服药物在一项III期试验中显示出疗效,并正在一项名为“STROGHAT”的试验中进行测试,该试验旨在证明使用“筛查和治疗”策略可以停止HAT的传播。本研究旨在探讨社区对当前和未来筛查和治疗策略的看法,并确定哪些可能成为参与的障碍,以预防这些障碍。我们在STROGHAT研究中包括的74个流行村庄中的4个选定村庄中与社区、社区领导人和流动单位经理进行了8次焦点小组讨论和18次半结构化访谈。我们的研究结果突出了四个主要的潜在障碍:病例稀少导致gHAT被认为是一种不再存在的疾病,参与筛查是浪费时间。缺乏对新治疗和筛查程序的认识,使人们对治疗毒性、腰椎穿刺和强制住院的恐惧和误解持续存在。现场给药的单剂量口服药物的引入引发了副作用监测和护理的问题。最后,在筛查组织中缺乏对社区文化规范的敏感性,使人们不愿参与。预测并将这些障碍纳入消除战略是很重要的。此外,通过其他基于社会科学的研究,还可以预见在所有过程中监测者对阿克唑波罗尔筛查和治疗的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases PARASITOLOGY-TROPICAL MEDICINE
自引率
10.50%
发文量
723
期刊介绍: PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases publishes research devoted to the pathology, epidemiology, prevention, treatment and control of the neglected tropical diseases (NTDs), as well as relevant public policy. The NTDs are defined as a group of poverty-promoting chronic infectious diseases, which primarily occur in rural areas and poor urban areas of low-income and middle-income countries. Their impact on child health and development, pregnancy, and worker productivity, as well as their stigmatizing features limit economic stability. All aspects of these diseases are considered, including: Pathogenesis Clinical features Pharmacology and treatment Diagnosis Epidemiology Vector biology Vaccinology and prevention Demographic, ecological and social determinants Public health and policy aspects (including cost-effectiveness analyses).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信