Simon Ingate, Kate Bendall, Christopher Long, Kevin Fetterman, Marie Liles-Burden, Carmit Strauss
{"title":"Tracking a Medicine's Regulatory Risk Management Commitments Provides Better Transparency and Oversight.","authors":"Simon Ingate, Kate Bendall, Christopher Long, Kevin Fetterman, Marie Liles-Burden, Carmit Strauss","doi":"10.1007/s43441-025-00825-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pharmaceutical companies are required to provide Risk Management Plans (RMPs) to support the marketing authorisation of medicines. These RMPs contain information on efficacy and safety, outline risks or gaps in information, and detail commitments for post-authorisation pharmacovigilance (PV) studies. These plans aim to enhance understanding of a drug's benefit-risk profile and information on risk mitigation and labelling strategies to ensure end-users are aware of the risks that are associated with the product. Per defined health authorities trigger, RMPs are updated with new data such as post-authorisation data and expanded product labels (new indications), leading to multiple versions. When specific risks require additional mitigation beyond product labelling, additional risk minimisation materials (aRMMs) may be applied to educate healthcare professionals (HCPs) and patients. In some cases, more stringent controls on drug use may be necessary. In all cases, these risk management commitments must be implemented in applicable countries where the medicine is marketed following local regulatory requirements. Implementing aRMMs necessitates the distribution of core or EU RMPs and aRMMs to local affiliates for localisation, approval by local health authorities, dissemination, and subsequent collection of effectiveness metrics. Managing multiple versions of core and local RMPs, aRMMs, and associated activities becomes a vital data management issue, requiring efficient tracking of the status of each document and locally agreed activities. This article explores developing and deploying a database-driven RMP and aRMM tracking system. It covers the determination of system requirements, the delivery of the system, and the assessment of its impact on the organisation.</p>","PeriodicalId":23084,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science","volume":" ","pages":"901-908"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12446136/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-025-00825-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Pharmaceutical companies are required to provide Risk Management Plans (RMPs) to support the marketing authorisation of medicines. These RMPs contain information on efficacy and safety, outline risks or gaps in information, and detail commitments for post-authorisation pharmacovigilance (PV) studies. These plans aim to enhance understanding of a drug's benefit-risk profile and information on risk mitigation and labelling strategies to ensure end-users are aware of the risks that are associated with the product. Per defined health authorities trigger, RMPs are updated with new data such as post-authorisation data and expanded product labels (new indications), leading to multiple versions. When specific risks require additional mitigation beyond product labelling, additional risk minimisation materials (aRMMs) may be applied to educate healthcare professionals (HCPs) and patients. In some cases, more stringent controls on drug use may be necessary. In all cases, these risk management commitments must be implemented in applicable countries where the medicine is marketed following local regulatory requirements. Implementing aRMMs necessitates the distribution of core or EU RMPs and aRMMs to local affiliates for localisation, approval by local health authorities, dissemination, and subsequent collection of effectiveness metrics. Managing multiple versions of core and local RMPs, aRMMs, and associated activities becomes a vital data management issue, requiring efficient tracking of the status of each document and locally agreed activities. This article explores developing and deploying a database-driven RMP and aRMM tracking system. It covers the determination of system requirements, the delivery of the system, and the assessment of its impact on the organisation.
期刊介绍:
Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science (TIRS) is the official scientific journal of DIA that strives to advance medical product discovery, development, regulation, and use through the publication of peer-reviewed original and review articles, commentaries, and letters to the editor across the spectrum of converting biomedical science into practical solutions to advance human health.
The focus areas of the journal are as follows:
Biostatistics
Clinical Trials
Product Development and Innovation
Global Perspectives
Policy
Regulatory Science
Product Safety
Special Populations