Tracking a Medicine's Regulatory Risk Management Commitments Provides Better Transparency and Oversight.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Simon Ingate, Kate Bendall, Christopher Long, Kevin Fetterman, Marie Liles-Burden, Carmit Strauss
{"title":"Tracking a Medicine's Regulatory Risk Management Commitments Provides Better Transparency and Oversight.","authors":"Simon Ingate, Kate Bendall, Christopher Long, Kevin Fetterman, Marie Liles-Burden, Carmit Strauss","doi":"10.1007/s43441-025-00825-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pharmaceutical companies are required to provide Risk Management Plans (RMPs) to support the marketing authorisation of medicines. These RMPs contain information on efficacy and safety, outline risks or gaps in information, and detail commitments for post-authorisation pharmacovigilance (PV) studies. These plans aim to enhance understanding of a drug's benefit-risk profile and information on risk mitigation and labelling strategies to ensure end-users are aware of the risks that are associated with the product. Per defined health authorities trigger, RMPs are updated with new data such as post-authorisation data and expanded product labels (new indications), leading to multiple versions. When specific risks require additional mitigation beyond product labelling, additional risk minimisation materials (aRMMs) may be applied to educate healthcare professionals (HCPs) and patients. In some cases, more stringent controls on drug use may be necessary. In all cases, these risk management commitments must be implemented in applicable countries where the medicine is marketed following local regulatory requirements. Implementing aRMMs necessitates the distribution of core or EU RMPs and aRMMs to local affiliates for localisation, approval by local health authorities, dissemination, and subsequent collection of effectiveness metrics. Managing multiple versions of core and local RMPs, aRMMs, and associated activities becomes a vital data management issue, requiring efficient tracking of the status of each document and locally agreed activities. This article explores developing and deploying a database-driven RMP and aRMM tracking system. It covers the determination of system requirements, the delivery of the system, and the assessment of its impact on the organisation.</p>","PeriodicalId":23084,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science","volume":" ","pages":"901-908"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12446136/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-025-00825-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pharmaceutical companies are required to provide Risk Management Plans (RMPs) to support the marketing authorisation of medicines. These RMPs contain information on efficacy and safety, outline risks or gaps in information, and detail commitments for post-authorisation pharmacovigilance (PV) studies. These plans aim to enhance understanding of a drug's benefit-risk profile and information on risk mitigation and labelling strategies to ensure end-users are aware of the risks that are associated with the product. Per defined health authorities trigger, RMPs are updated with new data such as post-authorisation data and expanded product labels (new indications), leading to multiple versions. When specific risks require additional mitigation beyond product labelling, additional risk minimisation materials (aRMMs) may be applied to educate healthcare professionals (HCPs) and patients. In some cases, more stringent controls on drug use may be necessary. In all cases, these risk management commitments must be implemented in applicable countries where the medicine is marketed following local regulatory requirements. Implementing aRMMs necessitates the distribution of core or EU RMPs and aRMMs to local affiliates for localisation, approval by local health authorities, dissemination, and subsequent collection of effectiveness metrics. Managing multiple versions of core and local RMPs, aRMMs, and associated activities becomes a vital data management issue, requiring efficient tracking of the status of each document and locally agreed activities. This article explores developing and deploying a database-driven RMP and aRMM tracking system. It covers the determination of system requirements, the delivery of the system, and the assessment of its impact on the organisation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

跟踪药品的监管风险管理承诺提供了更好的透明度和监督。
制药公司被要求提供风险管理计划(RMPs)来支持药品的上市许可。这些RMPs包含有关有效性和安全性的信息,概述了信息中的风险或空白,并详细说明了批准后药物警戒(PV)研究的承诺。这些计划旨在加强对药物利益-风险概况的了解,以及关于风险缓解和标签策略的信息,以确保最终用户了解与产品相关的风险。根据定义的卫生当局触发,rmp使用新数据(如授权后数据和扩展的产品标签(新适应症))进行更新,从而导致多个版本。当特定风险需要在产品标签之外的其他缓解措施时,可以使用额外的风险最小化材料(aRMMs)来教育医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)和患者。在某些情况下,可能需要更严格地控制药物的使用。在所有情况下,这些风险管理承诺必须在药品按照当地监管要求销售的适用国家实施。实施arms需要向地方附属机构分发核心或欧盟rmp和arms,以便进行本地化、地方卫生当局批准、传播和随后收集有效性指标。管理多个版本的核心和本地rmp、arm和相关活动成为一个重要的数据管理问题,需要有效地跟踪每个文档和本地商定活动的状态。本文探讨了开发和部署数据库驱动的RMP和aRMM跟踪系统。它包括系统需求的确定、系统的交付,以及对其对组织的影响的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science MEDICAL INFORMATICS-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.30%
发文量
127
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science (TIRS) is the official scientific journal of DIA that strives to advance medical product discovery, development, regulation, and use through the publication of peer-reviewed original and review articles, commentaries, and letters to the editor across the spectrum of converting biomedical science into practical solutions to advance human health. The focus areas of the journal are as follows: Biostatistics Clinical Trials Product Development and Innovation Global Perspectives Policy Regulatory Science Product Safety Special Populations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信