Evaluation of 4D cone-beam CT reconstruction methods for lung images acquired using rapid cone-beam CT acquisition: a phantom study.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Mark Gardner, Owen Dillon, Tess Reynolds, John Kipritidis, Magdalena Bazalova-Carter, Hilary Byrne, Maegan Stewart, Jeremy Booth, Paul J Keall
{"title":"Evaluation of 4D cone-beam CT reconstruction methods for lung images acquired using rapid cone-beam CT acquisition: a phantom study.","authors":"Mark Gardner, Owen Dillon, Tess Reynolds, John Kipritidis, Magdalena Bazalova-Carter, Hilary Byrne, Maegan Stewart, Jeremy Booth, Paul J Keall","doi":"10.1088/1361-6560/ade6bd","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective</i>. Cone-beam CT (CBCT) technological advances for linear accelerators (Linacs) have led to CBCT imaging in <20 s, which can reduce radiation therapy treatment times. However, these rapid CBCT scans only allow for 3DCBCT images. In this paper we evaluate 4DCBCT reconstruction methods for rapid acquisition 3DCBCT protocol scans using an anthropomorphic breathing phantom.<i>Approach</i>. We evaluate two previously developed motion-compensated Feldkamp-Davis-Kress (MCFDK) methods, using a prior-motion model (MCFDK-Prior) and a data-driven MCFDK method (MCFDK-DD), on CBCT images of the phantom using an Ethos linac. The deformable phantom lungs contained three synthetic tumours and a commercial phantom motion platform with a sinusoidal breathing pattern. The phantom was imaged in free-breathing with rapid (16.6 s) and standard (30.8 s) thorax 3DCBCT acquisition protocols, then reimaged while stationary at inhale and exhale, which were the ground truth reconstructions. MCFDK reconstructions were compared with conventional 3D-FDK and 4D-FDK reconstructions. Image quality was compared between all reconstructions using mean square error (MSE), structural similarity index measurement (SSIM), peak signal-to-noise (PSNR), edge response width (ERW) for the diaphragm-lung border for the right lung, tumour centroid accuracy, tumour dice similarity coefficient and sphericity.<i>Main results</i>. For all metrics the MCFDK-Prior reconstructions performed better than the 3D-FDK reconstructions. Similarly for all tumour-related metrics as well as ERW the MCFDK-DD reconstructions performed better than then 3D-FDK reconstructions, but the overall MSE, SSIM and PSNR were similar for the MCFDK-DD and 3D-FDK reconstructions. For all metrics except for tumour centroid error the MCFDK-Prior method produced better quality reconstructions than the MCFDK-DD method. 4D-FDK reconstructions produced poor quality volumes.<i>Significance</i>. We demonstrated that 4DCBCT reconstruction for rapid CBCT acquisition protocols is possible and leads to reduced motion artefacts and more accurate reconstructions when compared to 3DCBCT reconstructions. The 4DCBCT methods demonstrated in this paper will allow for fast, accurate 4DCBCT acquisition for new linacs.</p>","PeriodicalId":20185,"journal":{"name":"Physics in medicine and biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics in medicine and biology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ade6bd","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective. Cone-beam CT (CBCT) technological advances for linear accelerators (Linacs) have led to CBCT imaging in <20 s, which can reduce radiation therapy treatment times. However, these rapid CBCT scans only allow for 3DCBCT images. In this paper we evaluate 4DCBCT reconstruction methods for rapid acquisition 3DCBCT protocol scans using an anthropomorphic breathing phantom.Approach. We evaluate two previously developed motion-compensated Feldkamp-Davis-Kress (MCFDK) methods, using a prior-motion model (MCFDK-Prior) and a data-driven MCFDK method (MCFDK-DD), on CBCT images of the phantom using an Ethos linac. The deformable phantom lungs contained three synthetic tumours and a commercial phantom motion platform with a sinusoidal breathing pattern. The phantom was imaged in free-breathing with rapid (16.6 s) and standard (30.8 s) thorax 3DCBCT acquisition protocols, then reimaged while stationary at inhale and exhale, which were the ground truth reconstructions. MCFDK reconstructions were compared with conventional 3D-FDK and 4D-FDK reconstructions. Image quality was compared between all reconstructions using mean square error (MSE), structural similarity index measurement (SSIM), peak signal-to-noise (PSNR), edge response width (ERW) for the diaphragm-lung border for the right lung, tumour centroid accuracy, tumour dice similarity coefficient and sphericity.Main results. For all metrics the MCFDK-Prior reconstructions performed better than the 3D-FDK reconstructions. Similarly for all tumour-related metrics as well as ERW the MCFDK-DD reconstructions performed better than then 3D-FDK reconstructions, but the overall MSE, SSIM and PSNR were similar for the MCFDK-DD and 3D-FDK reconstructions. For all metrics except for tumour centroid error the MCFDK-Prior method produced better quality reconstructions than the MCFDK-DD method. 4D-FDK reconstructions produced poor quality volumes.Significance. We demonstrated that 4DCBCT reconstruction for rapid CBCT acquisition protocols is possible and leads to reduced motion artefacts and more accurate reconstructions when compared to 3DCBCT reconstructions. The 4DCBCT methods demonstrated in this paper will allow for fast, accurate 4DCBCT acquisition for new linacs.

快速锥形束CT采集肺部图像的4D锥形束CT重建方法的评价:一项幻象研究。
目的:锥形束CT (CBCT)直线加速器(Linacs)技术的进步导致了CBCT成像
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physics in medicine and biology
Physics in medicine and biology 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
409
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The development and application of theoretical, computational and experimental physics to medicine, physiology and biology. Topics covered are: therapy physics (including ionizing and non-ionizing radiation); biomedical imaging (e.g. x-ray, magnetic resonance, ultrasound, optical and nuclear imaging); image-guided interventions; image reconstruction and analysis (including kinetic modelling); artificial intelligence in biomedical physics and analysis; nanoparticles in imaging and therapy; radiobiology; radiation protection and patient dose monitoring; radiation dosimetry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信