Social Media and Youth Mental Health: Scoping Review of Platform and Policy Recommendations.

IF 5.8 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Jasleen Chhabra, Vita Pilkington, Ruben Benakovic, Michael James Wilson, Louise La Sala, Zac Seidler
{"title":"Social Media and Youth Mental Health: Scoping Review of Platform and Policy Recommendations.","authors":"Jasleen Chhabra, Vita Pilkington, Ruben Benakovic, Michael James Wilson, Louise La Sala, Zac Seidler","doi":"10.2196/72061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High rates of social media use and mental ill-health among young people have drawn significant public, policy, and research concern. Rapid technological advancements and changes in platform design have outpaced our understanding of the health effects of social media and hampered timely evidence-based regulatory responses. While a proliferation of recommendations to social media companies and governments has been published, a comprehensive summary of recommendations for protecting young people's mental health and digital safety does not yet exist.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This scoping review synthesized published recommendations for social media companies and governments in relation to young people's (aged 12-25 years) mental health. A qualitative approach was used to undertake inductive content analysis, where recommendations were grouped under conceptually similar themes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched academic (PubMed, Scopus, and PsycINFO) and nonacademic (Overton and Google) databases for relevant documents. Eligible documents provided recommendations to regulators and social media companies that pertained to social media, young people, and mental health. This review excluded recommendations for young people, caregivers, educators, or clinicians surrounding strategies for managing individual social media use; instead, the recommendations emphasized the regulation or design of social media products and practices of social media companies. Peer-reviewed and gray literature from selected Western contexts (Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States) were relevant for inclusion. Documents were published between January 2020 and September 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the identified 4980 unique reports, 120 (2.41%) progressed to full-text screening, and 70 (1.41%) met the inclusion criteria. Five interrelated themes were identified: (1) legislating and overseeing accountability, (2) transparency, (3) collaboration, (4) safety by design, and (5) restricting young people's access to social media.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review emphasizes the need for multipronged approaches to address the rapidly increasing presence and reach of social media platforms in the lives of young people. These recommendations provide practical and tangible paths forward for governments and industry, backed by expert organizations in youth mental health and technology regulation at a time when expert-informed guidance is sorely needed. Rigorous evaluation of the proposed recommendations is needed while continuing to build on the emerging peer-reviewed evidence base that should form the foundation of policy and regulatory changes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16337,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Internet Research","volume":"27 ","pages":"e72061"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Internet Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/72061","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: High rates of social media use and mental ill-health among young people have drawn significant public, policy, and research concern. Rapid technological advancements and changes in platform design have outpaced our understanding of the health effects of social media and hampered timely evidence-based regulatory responses. While a proliferation of recommendations to social media companies and governments has been published, a comprehensive summary of recommendations for protecting young people's mental health and digital safety does not yet exist.

Objective: This scoping review synthesized published recommendations for social media companies and governments in relation to young people's (aged 12-25 years) mental health. A qualitative approach was used to undertake inductive content analysis, where recommendations were grouped under conceptually similar themes.

Methods: We searched academic (PubMed, Scopus, and PsycINFO) and nonacademic (Overton and Google) databases for relevant documents. Eligible documents provided recommendations to regulators and social media companies that pertained to social media, young people, and mental health. This review excluded recommendations for young people, caregivers, educators, or clinicians surrounding strategies for managing individual social media use; instead, the recommendations emphasized the regulation or design of social media products and practices of social media companies. Peer-reviewed and gray literature from selected Western contexts (Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States) were relevant for inclusion. Documents were published between January 2020 and September 2024.

Results: Of the identified 4980 unique reports, 120 (2.41%) progressed to full-text screening, and 70 (1.41%) met the inclusion criteria. Five interrelated themes were identified: (1) legislating and overseeing accountability, (2) transparency, (3) collaboration, (4) safety by design, and (5) restricting young people's access to social media.

Conclusions: This review emphasizes the need for multipronged approaches to address the rapidly increasing presence and reach of social media platforms in the lives of young people. These recommendations provide practical and tangible paths forward for governments and industry, backed by expert organizations in youth mental health and technology regulation at a time when expert-informed guidance is sorely needed. Rigorous evaluation of the proposed recommendations is needed while continuing to build on the emerging peer-reviewed evidence base that should form the foundation of policy and regulatory changes.

社交媒体和青少年心理健康:平台和政策建议的范围审查。
背景:年轻人中社交媒体的高使用率和心理健康问题引起了公众、政策和研究的关注。快速的技术进步和平台设计的变化已经超过了我们对社交媒体对健康影响的理解,并阻碍了及时的基于证据的监管反应。虽然向社交媒体公司和政府提出了大量建议,但关于保护年轻人心理健康和数字安全的建议的全面总结尚未出现。目的:本次范围审查综合了针对社交媒体公司和政府的有关年轻人(12-25岁)心理健康的已发表建议。采用定性方法进行归纳内容分析,其中建议在概念上类似的主题下分组。方法:检索学术数据库(PubMed、Scopus和PsycINFO)和非学术数据库(Overton和谷歌),查找相关文献。符合条件的文件向监管机构和社交媒体公司提供了与社交媒体、年轻人和心理健康有关的建议。本综述排除了对年轻人、护理人员、教育工作者或临床医生有关管理个人社交媒体使用策略的建议;相反,这些建议强调了社交媒体产品的监管或设计以及社交媒体公司的实践。来自选定的西方国家(澳大利亚、加拿大、英国和美国)的同行评议和灰色文献与纳入相关。文件于2020年1月至2024年9月期间发布。结果:在确定的4980份独特报告中,120份(2.41%)进展到全文筛选,70份(1.41%)符合纳入标准。确定了五个相互关联的主题:(1)立法和监督问责制,(2)透明度,(3)合作,(4)设计安全,(5)限制年轻人使用社交媒体。结论:本综述强调需要采取多管齐下的方法来解决社交媒体平台在年轻人生活中迅速增加的存在和影响。这些建议为政府和行业提供了切实可行的前进道路,在迫切需要专家指导的时候,得到了青年心理健康和技术监管方面的专家组织的支持。需要对拟议的建议进行严格评估,同时继续以新兴的同行评议证据为基础,这些证据应成为政策和监管改革的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
5.40%
发文量
654
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR) is a highly respected publication in the field of health informatics and health services. With a founding date in 1999, JMIR has been a pioneer in the field for over two decades. As a leader in the industry, the journal focuses on digital health, data science, health informatics, and emerging technologies for health, medicine, and biomedical research. It is recognized as a top publication in these disciplines, ranking in the first quartile (Q1) by Impact Factor. Notably, JMIR holds the prestigious position of being ranked #1 on Google Scholar within the "Medical Informatics" discipline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信