A single-institution study of allograft outcomes for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia over 20 years.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Rory Bennett, Thomas Frawley, Philip A Thompson, Ashley Whitechurch, Amit Khot, Andrew W Roberts, John F Seymour, Mary Ann Anderson, David Ritchie
{"title":"A single-institution study of allograft outcomes for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia over 20 years.","authors":"Rory Bennett, Thomas Frawley, Philip A Thompson, Ashley Whitechurch, Amit Khot, Andrew W Roberts, John F Seymour, Mary Ann Anderson, David Ritchie","doi":"10.1111/imj.70124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) is an established potentially curative therapy for patients with high-risk chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL). Future availability of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies and bispecific antibodies may further reduce utilisation of alloSCT.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This retrospective analysis sought to describe institutional outcomes for alloSCT for CLL, to which future outcomes following immunotherapies may be compared locally.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with CLL in the institutional alloSCT database were identified. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to assess survival outcomes, and Gray's competing incidence analyses were used for cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) and non-relapse mortality (NRM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-two patients with CLL of median age 54 years (range 25-75), including 17 with prior Richter transformation, underwent alloSCT between 2000 and 2022. A total of 39% and 35.4% of tested patients harboured complex karyotype and del(17p) respectively. Median follow-up for survivors was 9.2 years. Two-year progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), CIR and NRM rates were 57.7%, 74%, 16.3% and 18.2% respectively. Ten-year PFS and OS were 38.2% and 50.8% respectively. Twenty-nine deaths occurred during follow-up, including 14 without prior CLL relapse. Del(17p) abnormality was associated with inferior PFS, and age ≥54 years at alloSCT was associated with inferior OS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Survival outcomes from this study align with prospective and retrospective data published from the chemoimmunotherapy era of CLL treatment. Although more recent data suggest improved post-alloSCT survival outcomes, data assessing the impact of novel agents distinct from improved alloSCT care are lacking. Our recommendations for the current role of alloSCT in CLL therapy are summarised.</p>","PeriodicalId":13625,"journal":{"name":"Internal Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.70124","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) is an established potentially curative therapy for patients with high-risk chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL). Future availability of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies and bispecific antibodies may further reduce utilisation of alloSCT.

Aim: This retrospective analysis sought to describe institutional outcomes for alloSCT for CLL, to which future outcomes following immunotherapies may be compared locally.

Methods: Patients with CLL in the institutional alloSCT database were identified. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to assess survival outcomes, and Gray's competing incidence analyses were used for cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) and non-relapse mortality (NRM).

Results: Sixty-two patients with CLL of median age 54 years (range 25-75), including 17 with prior Richter transformation, underwent alloSCT between 2000 and 2022. A total of 39% and 35.4% of tested patients harboured complex karyotype and del(17p) respectively. Median follow-up for survivors was 9.2 years. Two-year progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), CIR and NRM rates were 57.7%, 74%, 16.3% and 18.2% respectively. Ten-year PFS and OS were 38.2% and 50.8% respectively. Twenty-nine deaths occurred during follow-up, including 14 without prior CLL relapse. Del(17p) abnormality was associated with inferior PFS, and age ≥54 years at alloSCT was associated with inferior OS.

Conclusions: Survival outcomes from this study align with prospective and retrospective data published from the chemoimmunotherapy era of CLL treatment. Although more recent data suggest improved post-alloSCT survival outcomes, data assessing the impact of novel agents distinct from improved alloSCT care are lacking. Our recommendations for the current role of alloSCT in CLL therapy are summarised.

20年来慢性淋巴细胞白血病同种异体移植结果的单机构研究。
背景:同种异体干细胞移植(alloSCT)是一种确定的治疗高风险慢性淋巴细胞白血病(CLL)的潜在治疗方法。未来嵌合抗原受体t细胞疗法和双特异性抗体的出现可能会进一步减少同种异体细胞移植的使用。目的:本回顾性分析旨在描述同种异体细胞移植治疗CLL的机构结果,与局部免疫治疗后的未来结果进行比较。方法:对机构同种异体移植数据库中的CLL患者进行鉴定。Kaplan-Meier估计用于评估生存结果,Gray竞争发生率分析用于评估累积复发发生率(CIR)和非复发死亡率(NRM)。结果:62例中位年龄54岁(范围25-75岁)的CLL患者在2000年至2022年间接受了同种异体细胞移植,其中包括17例既往有里希特转化的患者。分别有39%和35.4%的患者携带复杂核型和del(17p)。幸存者的中位随访时间为9.2年。两年无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)、CIR和NRM分别为57.7%、74%、16.3%和18.2%。10年PFS和OS分别为38.2%和50.8%。随访期间发生29例死亡,其中14例既往无CLL复发。Del(17p)异常与较差的PFS相关,年龄≥54岁的alloSCT患者与较差的OS相关。结论:本研究的生存结果与CLL化疗免疫治疗时代发表的前瞻性和回顾性数据一致。尽管最近的数据表明,异体移植后的生存结果有所改善,但评估不同于改善的异体移植护理的新型药物的影响的数据缺乏。我们对目前同种异体细胞移植在CLL治疗中的作用的建议进行了总结。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Internal Medicine Journal
Internal Medicine Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
600
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Internal Medicine Journal is the official journal of the Adult Medicine Division of The Royal Australasian College of Physicians (RACP). Its purpose is to publish high-quality internationally competitive peer-reviewed original medical research, both laboratory and clinical, relating to the study and research of human disease. Papers will be considered from all areas of medical practice and science. The Journal also has a major role in continuing medical education and publishes review articles relevant to physician education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信