Frequent callers vs. frequent users - a scoping review of frequent contacts to the emergency medical services.

IF 2 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Astrid Karina Valås Harring, Maria Kjærgaard, Tine Bennedsen Gehrt
{"title":"Frequent callers vs. frequent users - a scoping review of frequent contacts to the emergency medical services.","authors":"Astrid Karina Valås Harring, Maria Kjærgaard, Tine Bennedsen Gehrt","doi":"10.1186/s12245-025-00925-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A significant limitation in the literature on frequent callers and frequent users of prehospital Emergency Medical Services (EMS) is the lack of consistent and thus, comparable definitions, as well as inconsistent use of terminology. Here we aim to summarise and address discrepancies in the existing literature, contributing to the ongoing discussion.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a systematic search of available literature from 2000 up until February 2024 in the PubMed database. Search terms related to both frequent callers and frequent users of the prehospital EMS.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>A total of 19 articles were included in our analysis of definitions of frequent callers and users of prehospital EMS. The average minimum number of calls required to be defined as a frequent caller was 42.5 calls per year (range: 4-120). For frequent users, an average minimum number of ambulance responses was 4.7 per year (range: 3-10).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings emphasise both the possibility and the need to distinguish between frequent users and frequent callers of prehospital EMS. Existing definitions in the literature vary widely, making comparisons difficult. Standardised definitions and consistent terminology are essential to address underlying issues and enable further research synthesis.</p>","PeriodicalId":13967,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"18 1","pages":"108"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12180229/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12245-025-00925-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A significant limitation in the literature on frequent callers and frequent users of prehospital Emergency Medical Services (EMS) is the lack of consistent and thus, comparable definitions, as well as inconsistent use of terminology. Here we aim to summarise and address discrepancies in the existing literature, contributing to the ongoing discussion.

Method: We conducted a systematic search of available literature from 2000 up until February 2024 in the PubMed database. Search terms related to both frequent callers and frequent users of the prehospital EMS.

Result: A total of 19 articles were included in our analysis of definitions of frequent callers and users of prehospital EMS. The average minimum number of calls required to be defined as a frequent caller was 42.5 calls per year (range: 4-120). For frequent users, an average minimum number of ambulance responses was 4.7 per year (range: 3-10).

Conclusion: Our findings emphasise both the possibility and the need to distinguish between frequent users and frequent callers of prehospital EMS. Existing definitions in the literature vary widely, making comparisons difficult. Standardised definitions and consistent terminology are essential to address underlying issues and enable further research synthesis.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

频繁呼叫者与频繁使用者——对紧急医疗服务频繁联系人的范围审查。
背景:关于院前紧急医疗服务(EMS)的频繁呼叫者和频繁使用者的文献中存在一个显著的限制,即缺乏一致的、可比较的定义,以及术语的不一致使用。在这里,我们的目标是总结和解决现有文献中的差异,为正在进行的讨论做出贡献。方法:系统检索PubMed数据库中2000年至2024年2月的文献。与院前EMS的频繁呼叫者和频繁用户相关的搜索词。结果:我们对院前EMS的频繁呼叫者和使用者的定义进行了分析,共纳入19篇文章。被定义为经常来电者的平均最低来电次数为每年42.5次(范围:4-120次)。对于频繁使用者,平均最低救护车应答次数为每年4.7次(范围:3-10次)。结论:我们的研究结果强调了区分院前EMS的频繁使用者和频繁呼叫者的可能性和必要性。现有的定义在文献中差异很大,使比较困难。标准化的定义和一致的术语对于解决潜在问题和促进进一步的综合研究至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of the journal is to bring to light the various clinical advancements and research developments attained over the world and thus help the specialty forge ahead. It is directed towards physicians and medical personnel undergoing training or working within the field of Emergency Medicine. Medical students who are interested in pursuing a career in Emergency Medicine will also benefit from the journal. This is particularly useful for trainees in countries where the specialty is still in its infancy. Disciplines covered will include interesting clinical cases, the latest evidence-based practice and research developments in Emergency medicine including emergency pediatrics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信