Vitamin D and risk of thyroid cancer: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Yunbin Shi, Lihui Qian, Tao Ma, Juntao Huang
{"title":"Vitamin D and risk of thyroid cancer: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study.","authors":"Yunbin Shi, Lihui Qian, Tao Ma, Juntao Huang","doi":"10.1007/s12672-025-03002-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the causal effect of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) on the risk of thyroid cancer (TC) by a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from two genome-wide association studies (GWAS), including 25(OH)D concentration levels in 417,580 individuals and 1415 individuals for TC. Genetic variants associated with serum 25(OH)D were selected as instrumental variables (IVs). The inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method served as the primary approach of MR analysis was used to evaluate the sensitivity of 25(OH)D to TC risk, while the weighted-median method, MR-Egger method, weighted mode and simple mode were employed as supplementary analyses. Cochran's Q test was used to test IV heterogeneity, MR-Egger regression test and MR-PRESSO global test were used to determine IV pleiotropy, and Leave-one-out analysis was used to check the stability of the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>112 SNPs associated with serum 25(OH)D were identified as IVs. The IVW method showed a causal relationship between 25(OH)D and TC risk (OR = 0.761, 95% CI 0.584-0.991, P = 0.043). The results of the weighted-median method (OR = 0.858, 95%CI 0.606-1.216, P = 0.389), MR-Egger method (OR = 0.782, 95% CI 0.552-1.108, P = 0.169), weighted mode (OR = 0.779, 95%CI 0.568-1.068, P = 0.123) and simple mode (OR = 0.616, 95% CI 0.218-1.739, P = 0.362) enhance the credibility of the IVW results. Cochran's Q test, MR-Egger regression test and MR-PRESSO global test suggest that there is no significant heterogeneity and pleiotropy in IV. The leave-one-out analysis indicates that the results are stable.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is a causal relationship between circulating vitamin D concentration and TC risk in the population. The lower the vitamin D levels, the higher the TC risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":11148,"journal":{"name":"Discover. Oncology","volume":"16 1","pages":"1165"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12181500/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discover. Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12672-025-03002-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the causal effect of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) on the risk of thyroid cancer (TC) by a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis.

Methods: We analyzed data from two genome-wide association studies (GWAS), including 25(OH)D concentration levels in 417,580 individuals and 1415 individuals for TC. Genetic variants associated with serum 25(OH)D were selected as instrumental variables (IVs). The inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method served as the primary approach of MR analysis was used to evaluate the sensitivity of 25(OH)D to TC risk, while the weighted-median method, MR-Egger method, weighted mode and simple mode were employed as supplementary analyses. Cochran's Q test was used to test IV heterogeneity, MR-Egger regression test and MR-PRESSO global test were used to determine IV pleiotropy, and Leave-one-out analysis was used to check the stability of the results.

Results: 112 SNPs associated with serum 25(OH)D were identified as IVs. The IVW method showed a causal relationship between 25(OH)D and TC risk (OR = 0.761, 95% CI 0.584-0.991, P = 0.043). The results of the weighted-median method (OR = 0.858, 95%CI 0.606-1.216, P = 0.389), MR-Egger method (OR = 0.782, 95% CI 0.552-1.108, P = 0.169), weighted mode (OR = 0.779, 95%CI 0.568-1.068, P = 0.123) and simple mode (OR = 0.616, 95% CI 0.218-1.739, P = 0.362) enhance the credibility of the IVW results. Cochran's Q test, MR-Egger regression test and MR-PRESSO global test suggest that there is no significant heterogeneity and pleiotropy in IV. The leave-one-out analysis indicates that the results are stable.

Conclusion: There is a causal relationship between circulating vitamin D concentration and TC risk in the population. The lower the vitamin D levels, the higher the TC risk.

维生素D与甲状腺癌的风险:一项双样本孟德尔随机研究。
目的:通过双样本孟德尔随机化(MR)分析,探讨血清25-羟基维生素D (25(OH)D)水平与甲状腺癌(TC)发病风险的因果关系。方法:我们分析了两项全基因组关联研究(GWAS)的数据,包括417,580名个体和1415名TC个体的25(OH)D浓度水平。选择与血清25(OH)D相关的遗传变异作为工具变量(IVs)。MR分析主要采用反方差加权法(IVW)评价25(OH)D对TC风险的敏感性,辅助分析采用加权中位数法、MR- egger法、加权模型和简单模型。IV异质性采用Cochran’s Q检验,IV多效性采用MR-Egger回归检验和MR-PRESSO全局检验,留一分析检验结果的稳定性。结果:112个与血清25(OH)D相关的snp被鉴定为IVs。IVW方法显示25(OH)D与TC风险之间存在因果关系(OR = 0.761, 95% CI 0.584-0.991, P = 0.043)。加权中位数法(OR = 0.858, 95%CI 0.606 ~ 1.216, P = 0.389)、MR-Egger法(OR = 0.782, 95%CI 0.552 ~ 1.108, P = 0.169)、加权模式(OR = 0.779, 95%CI 0.568 ~ 1.068, P = 0.123)和简单模式(OR = 0.616, 95%CI 0.218 ~ 1.739, P = 0.362)的结果增强了IVW结果的可信度。Cochran’s Q检验、MR-Egger回归检验和MR-PRESSO全局检验提示IV不存在显著异质性和多效性。留一分析表明结果稳定。结论:人群中循环维生素D浓度与TC风险之间存在因果关系。维生素D水平越低,患TC的风险就越高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Discover. Oncology
Discover. Oncology Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
122
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信