An Implementation Science Approach to Promote Bedside Interprofessional Rounding.

Elizabeth Riley, Sara E Peeples, Misty Williams, Thomas Nienaber, Neal Reeves, Taylor Steele, Heather Schay, Geoffrey Curran
{"title":"An Implementation Science Approach to Promote Bedside Interprofessional Rounding.","authors":"Elizabeth Riley, Sara E Peeples, Misty Williams, Thomas Nienaber, Neal Reeves, Taylor Steele, Heather Schay, Geoffrey Curran","doi":"10.1097/ANC.0000000000001267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lack of interprofessional communication in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) can result in delayed treatments, misdiagnoses, medication errors, patient injuries, and/or death. One approach to facilitate effective communication between team members and caregivers is the use of bedside interprofessional rounding (BIPR).</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this project was to standardize and increase BIPR participation with an implementation science approach. Secondary goals included measuring the impact of BIPR on central line dwell time and patient length of stay (LOS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The implementation of a BIPR checklist in the electronic health record (EHR), supported by other implementation strategies (eg, Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendations reporting tool, staff education, audit & feedback, and leadership engagement), was utilized to standardize rounding. Pre- and post-implementation data were analyzed for BIPR usage and quality metrics related to central line dwell time and patient LOS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On average, the BIPR checklist was utilized 87% during the first 6 months of deployment, with fluctuation in the weekly/monthly usage due to rounding team schedules. The BIPR checklist led to a 10.5% increase in nurse participation during rounds, 15 hours less average central line dwell time, and standardization of the rounding process as reported by team members, and no difference in LOS.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice/research: </strong>NICUs can individualize BIPR using implementation science strategies to enhance rounding standardization and improve specific neonatal outcomes. Based on these findings, tools to standardize and promote BIPR, along with staff education, audit & feedback, and leadership support, may benefit NICUs.</p>","PeriodicalId":520547,"journal":{"name":"Advances in neonatal care : official journal of the National Association of Neonatal Nurses","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in neonatal care : official journal of the National Association of Neonatal Nurses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ANC.0000000000001267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Lack of interprofessional communication in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) can result in delayed treatments, misdiagnoses, medication errors, patient injuries, and/or death. One approach to facilitate effective communication between team members and caregivers is the use of bedside interprofessional rounding (BIPR).

Purpose: The purpose of this project was to standardize and increase BIPR participation with an implementation science approach. Secondary goals included measuring the impact of BIPR on central line dwell time and patient length of stay (LOS).

Methods: The implementation of a BIPR checklist in the electronic health record (EHR), supported by other implementation strategies (eg, Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendations reporting tool, staff education, audit & feedback, and leadership engagement), was utilized to standardize rounding. Pre- and post-implementation data were analyzed for BIPR usage and quality metrics related to central line dwell time and patient LOS.

Results: On average, the BIPR checklist was utilized 87% during the first 6 months of deployment, with fluctuation in the weekly/monthly usage due to rounding team schedules. The BIPR checklist led to a 10.5% increase in nurse participation during rounds, 15 hours less average central line dwell time, and standardization of the rounding process as reported by team members, and no difference in LOS.

Implications for practice/research: NICUs can individualize BIPR using implementation science strategies to enhance rounding standardization and improve specific neonatal outcomes. Based on these findings, tools to standardize and promote BIPR, along with staff education, audit & feedback, and leadership support, may benefit NICUs.

一个实施科学的方法来促进床边跨专业的循环。
背景:新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)缺乏专业间沟通可能导致治疗延误、误诊、用药错误、患者受伤和/或死亡。促进团队成员和护理人员之间有效沟通的一种方法是使用床边跨专业舍入(BIPR)。目的:该项目的目的是通过科学的实施方法来规范和增加BIPR的参与。次要目标包括测量BIPR对中心线停留时间和患者住院时间(LOS)的影响。方法:在电子健康档案(EHR)中实施BIPR检查表,并辅以其他实施策略(例如,情况、背景、评估、建议报告工具、员工教育、审计和反馈以及领导参与)来标准化舍入。实施前和实施后的数据分析了BIPR的使用情况和与中心线停留时间和患者LOS相关的质量指标。结果:平均而言,在部署的前6个月,BIPR检查表的使用率为87%,由于团队时间表的变化,每周/每月的使用率会有所波动。BIPR检查表使查房时护士的参与增加了10.5%,平均中心线停留时间减少了15小时,小组成员报告的查房过程标准化,LOS没有差异。对实践/研究的启示:新生儿重症监护室可以通过实施科学策略来个性化BIPR,以加强舍入标准化和改善特定的新生儿结局。基于这些发现,标准化和促进BIPR的工具,以及员工教育、审计和反馈以及领导支持,可能会使新生儿重症监护室受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信