An Examination of Acoustic Neuroprotection in the Neonate: A Systematic Review.

Peyton Lewis Chumley, Katherine M Dudding, David E Vance
{"title":"An Examination of Acoustic Neuroprotection in the Neonate: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Peyton Lewis Chumley, Katherine M Dudding, David E Vance","doi":"10.1097/ANC.0000000000001280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hearing loss in neonates is more than 100 times that of the general pediatric population. Research suggests that there is a large amount of toxic noise exposure for these neonates in the neonatal intensive care unit and in the transport environments. Thus, acoustic neuroprotection, or auditory protection and support of neurodevelopment, is an important concept, particularly for neonates.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>A systematic review of the literature was conducted to determine the possibility of successfully supporting acoustic neuroprotection and decreasing the ambient noise level to the recommendations of the American Academy of Pediatrics.</p><p><strong>Methods/search strategy: </strong>Across 3 databases (PubMed, Cochrane, and Science Direct), 21 articles were identified.Following PRISMA guidelines, the search was expanded to articles less than 20 years old due to lack of current studies. Inclusion criteria for articles were: infants less than 1 year old; written in English or translated to English; published within last 20 years unless seminal research; a unit quality improvement project; a literature review; a peer-reviewed article. Exclusion criteria were duplicated articles and qualitative studies. Decibel levels were extracted from articles in various neonate environments and then compared to standard recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, the reviewed studies provided evidence that current interventions are unsuccessful in decreasing the amount of toxic noise exposure.</p><p><strong>Implications for research and practice: </strong>There are no \"gold standard\" interventions for protection of neonatal auditory systems, leading to inconsistent usage of current interventions and an overall lack of intervention focused research. More research is needed, particularly randomized controlled trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":520547,"journal":{"name":"Advances in neonatal care : official journal of the National Association of Neonatal Nurses","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in neonatal care : official journal of the National Association of Neonatal Nurses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ANC.0000000000001280","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hearing loss in neonates is more than 100 times that of the general pediatric population. Research suggests that there is a large amount of toxic noise exposure for these neonates in the neonatal intensive care unit and in the transport environments. Thus, acoustic neuroprotection, or auditory protection and support of neurodevelopment, is an important concept, particularly for neonates.

Purpose: A systematic review of the literature was conducted to determine the possibility of successfully supporting acoustic neuroprotection and decreasing the ambient noise level to the recommendations of the American Academy of Pediatrics.

Methods/search strategy: Across 3 databases (PubMed, Cochrane, and Science Direct), 21 articles were identified.Following PRISMA guidelines, the search was expanded to articles less than 20 years old due to lack of current studies. Inclusion criteria for articles were: infants less than 1 year old; written in English or translated to English; published within last 20 years unless seminal research; a unit quality improvement project; a literature review; a peer-reviewed article. Exclusion criteria were duplicated articles and qualitative studies. Decibel levels were extracted from articles in various neonate environments and then compared to standard recommendations.

Results: Overall, the reviewed studies provided evidence that current interventions are unsuccessful in decreasing the amount of toxic noise exposure.

Implications for research and practice: There are no "gold standard" interventions for protection of neonatal auditory systems, leading to inconsistent usage of current interventions and an overall lack of intervention focused research. More research is needed, particularly randomized controlled trials.

新生儿听神经保护的检查:系统综述。
背景:新生儿听力损失是普通儿科人口的100多倍。研究表明,在新生儿重症监护病房和运输环境中,这些新生儿暴露在大量有毒噪音中。因此,听觉神经保护,或听觉保护和支持神经发育,是一个重要的概念,特别是对新生儿。目的:对文献进行系统回顾,以确定成功支持听神经保护和降低环境噪声水平的可能性,以达到美国儿科学会的建议。方法/检索策略:在3个数据库(PubMed、Cochrane和Science Direct)中,确定了21篇文章。根据PRISMA指南,由于缺乏当前研究,搜索范围扩大到不到20年的文章。文章的纳入标准为:1岁以下婴儿;用英文书写或翻译成英文;除非是开创性研究,否则在近20年内发表;单位质量改进工程;文献综述;同行评议的文章。排除标准为重复文章和定性研究。从不同新生儿环境的物品中提取分贝水平,然后与标准建议进行比较。结果:总的来说,所回顾的研究提供的证据表明,目前的干预措施在减少有毒噪音暴露量方面是不成功的。对研究和实践的影响:没有保护新生儿听觉系统的“金标准”干预措施,导致目前干预措施的使用不一致,总体上缺乏以干预为重点的研究。需要更多的研究,特别是随机对照试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信