Experiences and Preferences Reported with an At-Home Self-Collection Device Compared with In-Clinic Speculum-Based Cervical Cancer Screening in the United States.
LaShonda Crane, Ashley Jennings, Megan B Fitzpatrick, Meghna Mukherjee, Callie Pitchford, Amy Nacht, Nia'Ja Mack, Kristina Krueger, Jessica Favreau, Kristin Conway, Laura Gillis, Christine Conageski, Elizabeth Sutton
{"title":"Experiences and Preferences Reported with an At-Home Self-Collection Device Compared with In-Clinic Speculum-Based Cervical Cancer Screening in the United States.","authors":"LaShonda Crane, Ashley Jennings, Megan B Fitzpatrick, Meghna Mukherjee, Callie Pitchford, Amy Nacht, Nia'Ja Mack, Kristina Krueger, Jessica Favreau, Kristin Conway, Laura Gillis, Christine Conageski, Elizabeth Sutton","doi":"10.1089/whr.2025.0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vaginal self-collection offers an effective option for cervical cancer (CC) screening that can improve screening experiences and engagement.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This article presents data from a multi-center pilot study (<i>n</i> = 185) across the United States, evaluating experiences and preferences reported with an at-home self-collection device compared with clinician-collected screening using a speculum. The device is designed specifically for at-home self-collection and optimized for performance and usability, where collected samples are tested for high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) using the Roche cobas HPV test. In an earlier report, self-collected samples using this device showed high agreement for hrHPV detection when compared with clinician-collection with a speculum and cervical brush.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Participants were screened with a self-collection device and a clinician-collection. They provided feedback about their experiences via usability and preference surveys.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significantly more participants reported pain (<i>p</i> < 0.001), discomfort (<i>p</i> < 0.001), embarrassment (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and nervousness (<i>p</i> < 0.001) during clinician-collection compared with self-collection. In contrast, being at-ease (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and in-control (<i>p</i> < 0.001) were reported significantly more during self-collection. Similar patterns held across demographic groups relevant to CC screening engagement and related risk (i.e., sexual orientation, menopause status, income, and prior HPV diagnosis). Almost all (94% [156/166]) felt confident using the at-home self-collection device if they knew the results would be equivalent to clinician-collection. The device demonstrated wide usability, with 96% (163/170) successfully self-collecting using only the device's provided instructions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>By improving screening experiences and accessibility, at-home self-collection can increase screening participation and accelerate progress toward eliminating CC as a public health concern in the United States.</p>","PeriodicalId":75329,"journal":{"name":"Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)","volume":"6 1","pages":"564-575"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12177322/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/whr.2025.0017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Vaginal self-collection offers an effective option for cervical cancer (CC) screening that can improve screening experiences and engagement.
Objective: This article presents data from a multi-center pilot study (n = 185) across the United States, evaluating experiences and preferences reported with an at-home self-collection device compared with clinician-collected screening using a speculum. The device is designed specifically for at-home self-collection and optimized for performance and usability, where collected samples are tested for high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) using the Roche cobas HPV test. In an earlier report, self-collected samples using this device showed high agreement for hrHPV detection when compared with clinician-collection with a speculum and cervical brush.
Study design: Participants were screened with a self-collection device and a clinician-collection. They provided feedback about their experiences via usability and preference surveys.
Results: Significantly more participants reported pain (p < 0.001), discomfort (p < 0.001), embarrassment (p < 0.001), and nervousness (p < 0.001) during clinician-collection compared with self-collection. In contrast, being at-ease (p < 0.001) and in-control (p < 0.001) were reported significantly more during self-collection. Similar patterns held across demographic groups relevant to CC screening engagement and related risk (i.e., sexual orientation, menopause status, income, and prior HPV diagnosis). Almost all (94% [156/166]) felt confident using the at-home self-collection device if they knew the results would be equivalent to clinician-collection. The device demonstrated wide usability, with 96% (163/170) successfully self-collecting using only the device's provided instructions.
Conclusion: By improving screening experiences and accessibility, at-home self-collection can increase screening participation and accelerate progress toward eliminating CC as a public health concern in the United States.