Experiences and Preferences Reported with an At-Home Self-Collection Device Compared with In-Clinic Speculum-Based Cervical Cancer Screening in the United States.

IF 1.8 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.) Pub Date : 2025-05-19 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1089/whr.2025.0017
LaShonda Crane, Ashley Jennings, Megan B Fitzpatrick, Meghna Mukherjee, Callie Pitchford, Amy Nacht, Nia'Ja Mack, Kristina Krueger, Jessica Favreau, Kristin Conway, Laura Gillis, Christine Conageski, Elizabeth Sutton
{"title":"Experiences and Preferences Reported with an At-Home Self-Collection Device Compared with In-Clinic Speculum-Based Cervical Cancer Screening in the United States.","authors":"LaShonda Crane, Ashley Jennings, Megan B Fitzpatrick, Meghna Mukherjee, Callie Pitchford, Amy Nacht, Nia'Ja Mack, Kristina Krueger, Jessica Favreau, Kristin Conway, Laura Gillis, Christine Conageski, Elizabeth Sutton","doi":"10.1089/whr.2025.0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vaginal self-collection offers an effective option for cervical cancer (CC) screening that can improve screening experiences and engagement.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This article presents data from a multi-center pilot study (<i>n</i> = 185) across the United States, evaluating experiences and preferences reported with an at-home self-collection device compared with clinician-collected screening using a speculum. The device is designed specifically for at-home self-collection and optimized for performance and usability, where collected samples are tested for high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) using the Roche cobas HPV test. In an earlier report, self-collected samples using this device showed high agreement for hrHPV detection when compared with clinician-collection with a speculum and cervical brush.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Participants were screened with a self-collection device and a clinician-collection. They provided feedback about their experiences via usability and preference surveys.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significantly more participants reported pain (<i>p</i> < 0.001), discomfort (<i>p</i> < 0.001), embarrassment (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and nervousness (<i>p</i> < 0.001) during clinician-collection compared with self-collection. In contrast, being at-ease (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and in-control (<i>p</i> < 0.001) were reported significantly more during self-collection. Similar patterns held across demographic groups relevant to CC screening engagement and related risk (i.e., sexual orientation, menopause status, income, and prior HPV diagnosis). Almost all (94% [156/166]) felt confident using the at-home self-collection device if they knew the results would be equivalent to clinician-collection. The device demonstrated wide usability, with 96% (163/170) successfully self-collecting using only the device's provided instructions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>By improving screening experiences and accessibility, at-home self-collection can increase screening participation and accelerate progress toward eliminating CC as a public health concern in the United States.</p>","PeriodicalId":75329,"journal":{"name":"Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)","volume":"6 1","pages":"564-575"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12177322/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/whr.2025.0017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Vaginal self-collection offers an effective option for cervical cancer (CC) screening that can improve screening experiences and engagement.

Objective: This article presents data from a multi-center pilot study (n = 185) across the United States, evaluating experiences and preferences reported with an at-home self-collection device compared with clinician-collected screening using a speculum. The device is designed specifically for at-home self-collection and optimized for performance and usability, where collected samples are tested for high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) using the Roche cobas HPV test. In an earlier report, self-collected samples using this device showed high agreement for hrHPV detection when compared with clinician-collection with a speculum and cervical brush.

Study design: Participants were screened with a self-collection device and a clinician-collection. They provided feedback about their experiences via usability and preference surveys.

Results: Significantly more participants reported pain (p < 0.001), discomfort (p < 0.001), embarrassment (p < 0.001), and nervousness (p < 0.001) during clinician-collection compared with self-collection. In contrast, being at-ease (p < 0.001) and in-control (p < 0.001) were reported significantly more during self-collection. Similar patterns held across demographic groups relevant to CC screening engagement and related risk (i.e., sexual orientation, menopause status, income, and prior HPV diagnosis). Almost all (94% [156/166]) felt confident using the at-home self-collection device if they knew the results would be equivalent to clinician-collection. The device demonstrated wide usability, with 96% (163/170) successfully self-collecting using only the device's provided instructions.

Conclusion: By improving screening experiences and accessibility, at-home self-collection can increase screening participation and accelerate progress toward eliminating CC as a public health concern in the United States.

在美国,与临床腔镜筛查相比,使用家用自收集装置的经验和偏好报告。
背景:阴道自我采集为宫颈癌(CC)筛查提供了有效的选择,可以改善筛查体验和参与度。目的:本文介绍了美国一项多中心试点研究(n = 185)的数据,评估了使用家庭自行收集设备与使用窥镜进行临床收集筛查的经验和偏好。该设备专为家庭自我收集而设计,并针对性能和可用性进行了优化,其中收集的样本使用罗氏cobas HPV检测对高危人乳头瘤病毒(hrHPV)进行检测。在早期的一份报告中,与临床医生用窥镜和宫颈刷收集的样本相比,使用该设备自行收集的样本对hrHPV检测的一致性很高。研究设计:参与者通过自我收集装置和临床收集装置进行筛选。他们通过可用性和偏好调查提供了他们的体验反馈。结果:与自我收集相比,临床收集过程中疼痛(p < 0.001)、不适(p < 0.001)、尴尬(p < 0.001)和紧张(p < 0.001)的参与者显著增加。相比之下,自在(p < 0.001)和控制(p < 0.001)在自我收集过程中显著增加。与CC筛查参与和相关风险(即性取向、绝经状态、收入和既往HPV诊断)相关的人口统计学群体也存在类似的模式。几乎所有(94%[156/166])的人都有信心使用家庭自动收集装置,如果他们知道结果等同于临床收集。该设备显示了广泛的可用性,96%(163/170)成功地使用设备提供的说明进行自我收集。结论:通过改善筛查体验和可及性,家庭自我收集可以提高筛查参与度,并加速消除CC作为美国公共卫生问题的进程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信