Structural and clinical disease severity in thumb osteoarthritis: A pilot study integrating imaging analysis and pain mechanisms.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Lauren Straatman, Megan Hutter, Randa Mudathir, Assaf Kadar, David M Walton, Emily A Lalone
{"title":"Structural and clinical disease severity in thumb osteoarthritis: A pilot study integrating imaging analysis and pain mechanisms.","authors":"Lauren Straatman, Megan Hutter, Randa Mudathir, Assaf Kadar, David M Walton, Emily A Lalone","doi":"10.1016/j.jht.2025.04.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We sought to explore pain mechanisms in thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis using imaging-based biomarkers and clinical pain evaluation techniques, and to identify potential pain phenotypes among patients with thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis that may be useful for designing more targeted research and intervention strategies.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Pilot case-control study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants (n=9 healthy; n=9 thumb osteoarthritis) underwent static CT scans of the hand and wrist, accompanied by a calibration phantom with known densities. Participants completed patient-reported outcome measures targeting different pain mechanisms. Average subchondral volumetric bone mineral density was analyzed in the first metacarpal and third metacarpal at three depths (0-2.5, 2.5-5.0, and 5.0-7.5 mm), while the trapezium was studied at five depths (0-1.25, 1.25-2.5, 2.5-3.75, 3.75-5.0, and 5.0-6.25 mm). Joint contact area of first metacarpal and trapezium was averaged for all participants. All patient-reported outcome measures were analyzed separately using conceptualized thresholds to characterize pain mechanisms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Post hoc power was low (26%). The thumb osteoarthritis cohort showed statistically significant lower bone density than the healthy cohort (p<0.05), save for the trapezium's top layer. Effect sizes ranged from 1.06-1.77, with the largest effect in the trapezium's third layer (d=1.77), favoring the healthy cohort. Nociceptive pain was the dominant pain phenotype, suggesting peripheral pain mechanisms in this sample.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite limited generalizability due to small sample size, these preliminary findings suggest biological contributors---such as local bone density loss and nociceptive pain dominance---to clinical disease severity in thumb osteoarthritis.</p>","PeriodicalId":54814,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2025.04.014","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We sought to explore pain mechanisms in thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis using imaging-based biomarkers and clinical pain evaluation techniques, and to identify potential pain phenotypes among patients with thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis that may be useful for designing more targeted research and intervention strategies.

Study design: Pilot case-control study.

Methods: Participants (n=9 healthy; n=9 thumb osteoarthritis) underwent static CT scans of the hand and wrist, accompanied by a calibration phantom with known densities. Participants completed patient-reported outcome measures targeting different pain mechanisms. Average subchondral volumetric bone mineral density was analyzed in the first metacarpal and third metacarpal at three depths (0-2.5, 2.5-5.0, and 5.0-7.5 mm), while the trapezium was studied at five depths (0-1.25, 1.25-2.5, 2.5-3.75, 3.75-5.0, and 5.0-6.25 mm). Joint contact area of first metacarpal and trapezium was averaged for all participants. All patient-reported outcome measures were analyzed separately using conceptualized thresholds to characterize pain mechanisms.

Results: Post hoc power was low (26%). The thumb osteoarthritis cohort showed statistically significant lower bone density than the healthy cohort (p<0.05), save for the trapezium's top layer. Effect sizes ranged from 1.06-1.77, with the largest effect in the trapezium's third layer (d=1.77), favoring the healthy cohort. Nociceptive pain was the dominant pain phenotype, suggesting peripheral pain mechanisms in this sample.

Conclusions: Despite limited generalizability due to small sample size, these preliminary findings suggest biological contributors---such as local bone density loss and nociceptive pain dominance---to clinical disease severity in thumb osteoarthritis.

拇指骨关节炎的结构和临床疾病严重程度:一项综合影像学分析和疼痛机制的初步研究。
背景:我们试图利用基于成像的生物标志物和临床疼痛评估技术来探索拇指腕掌骨关节炎的疼痛机制,并确定拇指腕掌骨关节炎患者的潜在疼痛表型,这可能有助于设计更有针对性的研究和干预策略。研究设计:试点病例对照研究。方法:受试者(n=9,健康;n=9拇指骨关节炎患者)接受手部和手腕静态CT扫描,并伴有已知密度的校准幻像。参与者完成了针对不同疼痛机制的患者报告结果测量。分析第一掌骨和第三掌骨3个深度(0-2.5、2.5-5.0和5.0-7.5 mm)的平均软骨下体积骨密度,同时研究5个深度(0-1.25、1.25-2.5、2.5-3.75、3.75-5.0和5.0-6.25 mm)的斜方骨。所有参与者的第一掌骨和斜方关节接触面积均取平均值。所有患者报告的结果测量分别分析,使用概念化阈值来表征疼痛机制。结果:术后功率低(26%)。结论:尽管由于样本量小,可推广性有限,但这些初步发现表明,生物因素——如局部骨密度损失和痛觉性疼痛主导——对拇指骨关节炎的临床疾病严重程度有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Hand Therapy
Journal of Hand Therapy 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
19.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hand Therapy is designed for hand therapists, occupational and physical therapists, and other hand specialists involved in the rehabilitation of disabling hand problems. The Journal functions as a source of education and information by publishing scientific and clinical articles. Regular features include original reports, clinical reviews, case studies, editorials, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信