Health Behavior Decision-Making of Stroke High-Risk Population: A Latent Profile Analysis.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Chenxi Zhou, Shanshan Wang, Beilei Lin, Bowen Liu, Lanlan Zhang, Yunjing Qiu, Jingfeng Chen, Haoran Wang, Zhenxiang Zhang
{"title":"Health Behavior Decision-Making of Stroke High-Risk Population: A Latent Profile Analysis.","authors":"Chenxi Zhou, Shanshan Wang, Beilei Lin, Bowen Liu, Lanlan Zhang, Yunjing Qiu, Jingfeng Chen, Haoran Wang, Zhenxiang Zhang","doi":"10.1002/nur.70001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The primary prevention of stroke high-risk groups is contingent upon health behavior intervention, and the key to such interventions is health behavioral decision-making. The present study aims to explore the potential classification of the health behavior decision-making of high-risk stroke groups using latent profile analysis (LPA) and the key influencing factors of the LPA classes. A cross-sectional study was conducted from January to May 2023 with 264 high-risk individuals of stroke in Henan Province, China. Data were collected using the Behavioral Decision Assessment Scale of Stroke Patients, the Revised Health Promoting Lifestyle Profile-II and the Social Support Rating Scale. LPA showed that a three-profile model of health behavior decision-making best fit this study. Health behavior decision-making of stroke high-risk groups were divided into three latent classes: high-output behavior type (23.1%), influence-impervious type (60.6%), and influence-sensitive type (16.3%). Comparisons between the three LPA classes showed that living situation, per capita monthly household income, hypertension, overweight/obesity, health promoting lifestyle behavior were significantly different between the participants' latent classes of behavior decision-making. Clinical staff can develop targeted interventions according to different problems existing in the decision-making processes, and improve and implement the screening content and process among community high-risk stroke groups, which has practical significance for promoting their healthy behaviors. Patient or Public Contribution: In our study, survey questionnaires were completed by participants at high risk of stroke.</p>","PeriodicalId":54492,"journal":{"name":"Research in Nursing & Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Nursing & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.70001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The primary prevention of stroke high-risk groups is contingent upon health behavior intervention, and the key to such interventions is health behavioral decision-making. The present study aims to explore the potential classification of the health behavior decision-making of high-risk stroke groups using latent profile analysis (LPA) and the key influencing factors of the LPA classes. A cross-sectional study was conducted from January to May 2023 with 264 high-risk individuals of stroke in Henan Province, China. Data were collected using the Behavioral Decision Assessment Scale of Stroke Patients, the Revised Health Promoting Lifestyle Profile-II and the Social Support Rating Scale. LPA showed that a three-profile model of health behavior decision-making best fit this study. Health behavior decision-making of stroke high-risk groups were divided into three latent classes: high-output behavior type (23.1%), influence-impervious type (60.6%), and influence-sensitive type (16.3%). Comparisons between the three LPA classes showed that living situation, per capita monthly household income, hypertension, overweight/obesity, health promoting lifestyle behavior were significantly different between the participants' latent classes of behavior decision-making. Clinical staff can develop targeted interventions according to different problems existing in the decision-making processes, and improve and implement the screening content and process among community high-risk stroke groups, which has practical significance for promoting their healthy behaviors. Patient or Public Contribution: In our study, survey questionnaires were completed by participants at high risk of stroke.

脑卒中高危人群的健康行为决策:潜在剖面分析。
卒中高危人群的一级预防有赖于健康行为干预,而健康行为干预的关键是健康行为决策。本研究旨在利用潜在特征分析(latent profile analysis, LPA)探讨高危脑卒中人群健康行为决策的潜在分类及其关键影响因素。本文于2023年1 - 5月对中国河南省264例脑卒中高危人群进行了横断面研究。采用脑卒中患者行为决策评估量表、修订后的健康促进生活方式量表和社会支持评定量表收集数据。LPA结果显示,健康行为决策的三轮廓模型最适合本研究。卒中高危人群健康行为决策分为高输出行为型(23.1%)、影响不透型(60.6%)和影响敏感型(16.3%)3个潜类。三个LPA类别之间的比较表明,生活状况、家庭人均月收入、高血压、超重/肥胖、健康促进生活方式行为在行为决策的潜在类别之间存在显著差异。临床工作人员可以根据决策过程中存在的不同问题,制定有针对性的干预措施,改进和实施社区卒中高危人群的筛查内容和流程,对促进其健康行为具有现实意义。患者或公众贡献:在我们的研究中,调查问卷由卒中高风险参与者完成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Research in Nursing & Health ( RINAH ) is a peer-reviewed general research journal devoted to publication of a wide range of research that will inform the practice of nursing and other health disciplines. The editors invite reports of research describing problems and testing interventions related to health phenomena, health care and self-care, clinical organization and administration; and the testing of research findings in practice. Research protocols are considered if funded in a peer-reviewed process by an agency external to the authors’ home institution and if the work is in progress. Papers on research methods and techniques are appropriate if they go beyond what is already generally available in the literature and include description of successful use of the method. Theory papers are accepted if each proposition is supported by research evidence. Systematic reviews of the literature are reviewed if PRISMA guidelines are followed. Letters to the editor commenting on published articles are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信