The Utilization of the Landing Error Scoring System in Patients' Postanterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: An Exploratory Factor Analysis.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION
Amelia S Bruce Leicht, Xavier D Thompson, Robin M Queen, Jordan Rodu, Michael J Higgins, Kevin M Cross, Brian C Werner, Jacob E Resch, Joe M Hart
{"title":"The Utilization of the Landing Error Scoring System in Patients' Postanterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: An Exploratory Factor Analysis.","authors":"Amelia S Bruce Leicht, Xavier D Thompson, Robin M Queen, Jordan Rodu, Michael J Higgins, Kevin M Cross, Brian C Werner, Jacob E Resch, Joe M Hart","doi":"10.1123/jsr.2024-0249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>The landing error scoring system (LESS) was developed to screen healthy individuals for anterior cruciate ligament  (ACL) injury risk factors using a jump landing task. The purpose of this study was to evaluate unique landing error components of a modified LESS scoring criteria to determine its clinical utility in patients following ACL reconstruction (ACLR).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>An observational cross-sectional study design was implemented to determine if each individual error component of the modified LESS provided unique information in an ACLR patient population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Post-ACLR patients (N = 194 [47.9% female]) completed the LESS 7.91 (1.80) months after surgery. To complete the LESS, patients stood on a 30-cm plyometric box and jumped down to a ground target, at 50% of their height in front of the box, then completed a maximal vertical jump. The LESS was repeated 3 times. Two video cameras positioned 3 m from the landing area at a height of 1 m above the floor (frontal and sagittal) recorded all trials. Video analysis of landing kinematics was performed to determine scores for each error item using the modified LESS. Itemized error scores for each patient were evaluated using an exploratory factor analysis, and factors were retained if eigenvalues were greater than 1.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our exploratory factor analysis yielded 2 factor groupings. The first factor (λ = 1.61) was comprised of 4 biplanar error items (ie, errors that occur in both the frontal and sagittal plane) that evaluated body segment positioning (eg, hip and knee flexion during landing). The second factor (λ = 1.02) was comprised of 2 errors occurring in the frontal plane that evaluated knee valgus and the overall impression of their landing strategy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Reducing the modified LESS errors to 6-items could improve the efficiency and clinical utilization of the LESS in ACLR patients. An abbreviated version of the modified LESS may guide clinicians' decision making in gauging patients' readiness to return to play after ACLR.</p>","PeriodicalId":50041,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sport Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sport Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2024-0249","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: The landing error scoring system (LESS) was developed to screen healthy individuals for anterior cruciate ligament  (ACL) injury risk factors using a jump landing task. The purpose of this study was to evaluate unique landing error components of a modified LESS scoring criteria to determine its clinical utility in patients following ACL reconstruction (ACLR).

Design: An observational cross-sectional study design was implemented to determine if each individual error component of the modified LESS provided unique information in an ACLR patient population.

Methods: Post-ACLR patients (N = 194 [47.9% female]) completed the LESS 7.91 (1.80) months after surgery. To complete the LESS, patients stood on a 30-cm plyometric box and jumped down to a ground target, at 50% of their height in front of the box, then completed a maximal vertical jump. The LESS was repeated 3 times. Two video cameras positioned 3 m from the landing area at a height of 1 m above the floor (frontal and sagittal) recorded all trials. Video analysis of landing kinematics was performed to determine scores for each error item using the modified LESS. Itemized error scores for each patient were evaluated using an exploratory factor analysis, and factors were retained if eigenvalues were greater than 1.

Results: Our exploratory factor analysis yielded 2 factor groupings. The first factor (λ = 1.61) was comprised of 4 biplanar error items (ie, errors that occur in both the frontal and sagittal plane) that evaluated body segment positioning (eg, hip and knee flexion during landing). The second factor (λ = 1.02) was comprised of 2 errors occurring in the frontal plane that evaluated knee valgus and the overall impression of their landing strategy.

Conclusions: Reducing the modified LESS errors to 6-items could improve the efficiency and clinical utilization of the LESS in ACLR patients. An abbreviated version of the modified LESS may guide clinicians' decision making in gauging patients' readiness to return to play after ACLR.

着陆误差评分系统在患者后十字韧带重建中的应用:探索性因素分析。
背景:着陆错误评分系统(LESS)的开发是为了筛选健康个体前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤的危险因素使用跳跃着陆任务。本研究的目的是评估改进后的LESS评分标准的独特着陆误差成分,以确定其在ACL重建(ACLR)患者中的临床应用。设计:采用观察性横断面研究设计,以确定修改后的LESS的每个误差成分是否在ACLR患者群体中提供了独特的信息。方法:术后aclr患者194例(女性47.9%),术后完成LESS 7.91(1.80)个月。为了完成LESS,患者站在一个30厘米的增强式盒子上,跳到一个地面目标,在盒子前面他们身高的50%,然后完成最大垂直跳跃。LESS重复3次。两台摄像机位于距离着陆区3米、距地面1米的位置(正面和矢状面),记录了所有试验。对着陆运动学进行视频分析,使用改进的LESS来确定每个误差项的分数。使用探索性因子分析评估每个患者的逐项错误评分,如果特征值大于1,则保留因素。结果:探索性因子分析得到2个因子分组。第一个因素(λ = 1.61)由4个双平面误差项目(即,同时发生在额位面和矢状面的误差)组成,用于评估身体部位定位(例如,着陆时髋关节和膝关节屈曲)。第二个因素(λ = 1.02)由发生在前平面的2个错误组成,用于评估膝关节外翻和他们的着陆策略的总体印象。结论:将改进后的LESS误差减少到6项,可提高ACLR患者LESS的效率和临床利用率。修改后的LESS的简化版本可以指导临床医生在评估ACLR后患者是否准备好重返赛场时做出决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Sport Rehabilitation
Journal of Sport Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
143
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sport Rehabilitation (JSR) is your source for the latest peer-reviewed research in the field of sport rehabilitation. All members of the sports-medicine team will benefit from the wealth of important information in each issue. JSR is completely devoted to the rehabilitation of sport and exercise injuries, regardless of the age, gender, sport ability, level of fitness, or health status of the participant. JSR publishes peer-reviewed original research, systematic reviews/meta-analyses, critically appraised topics (CATs), case studies/series, and technical reports that directly affect the management and rehabilitation of injuries incurred during sport-related activities, irrespective of the individual’s age, gender, sport ability, level of fitness, or health status. The journal is intended to provide an international, multidisciplinary forum to serve the needs of all members of the sports medicine team, including athletic trainers/therapists, sport physical therapists/physiotherapists, sports medicine physicians, and other health care and medical professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信