Do Kinesiophobia Levels During Recovery Change After Primary Versus Secondary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction?

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION
Megna Mishra, Louise Thoma, Deidra Charity, Xavier D Thompson, Joe M Hart, Shelby Baez
{"title":"Do Kinesiophobia Levels During Recovery Change After Primary Versus Secondary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction?","authors":"Megna Mishra, Louise Thoma, Deidra Charity, Xavier D Thompson, Joe M Hart, Shelby Baez","doi":"10.1123/jsr.2024-0393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Thirty percent of athletes go on to sustain a secondary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury after return to sport. Those that went on to suffer a secondary injury had greater kinesiophobia levels at time of return to sport; however, these relationships have primarily been observed in patients after primary ACL reconstruction (ACLR). The purpose of this study is to compare differences in kinesiophobia 4 to 8 months after an individual's primary versus secondary ACLR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a secondary analysis of an ongoing point of care study. To create our analytic sample, we identified participants between the ages of 14 and 35 years in the study protocol who provided data after primary and secondary ACLR, were 4 to 8 months status post-ACLR, and reported no concomitant surgical procedures at the time of primary or secondary ACLR that significantly delayed their rehabilitation protocol (e.g., meniscal repair). Demographic and participant characteristics and the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia-17 scores were collected after both primary and secondary ACLR. This study is a within-subjects design. Paired t tests were used to compare Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia-17 scores between the primary and secondary ACLR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen participants (male = 10, female = 6; height = 172.2 [11.5] cm, weight = 72.2 [20.9] kg) met inclusion criteria for the present study. Participants were 18.2 (3.0) years old and 5.6 (1.0) months since surgery after primary ACLR and 19.0 (1.0) years old and 5.9 (1.0) months since surgery after secondary ACLR. The average score for Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia-17 was not different (P = .77) after the primary (32.7 [5.0]) and secondary ACLR (33.1 [5.2]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There were no significant differences in kinesiophobia levels in individuals after their primary and secondary ACLR. Although nonsignificant, there is lack of resolution of kinesiophobia between primary and secondary ACLR.</p>","PeriodicalId":50041,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sport Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sport Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2024-0393","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Thirty percent of athletes go on to sustain a secondary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury after return to sport. Those that went on to suffer a secondary injury had greater kinesiophobia levels at time of return to sport; however, these relationships have primarily been observed in patients after primary ACL reconstruction (ACLR). The purpose of this study is to compare differences in kinesiophobia 4 to 8 months after an individual's primary versus secondary ACLR.

Methods: This is a secondary analysis of an ongoing point of care study. To create our analytic sample, we identified participants between the ages of 14 and 35 years in the study protocol who provided data after primary and secondary ACLR, were 4 to 8 months status post-ACLR, and reported no concomitant surgical procedures at the time of primary or secondary ACLR that significantly delayed their rehabilitation protocol (e.g., meniscal repair). Demographic and participant characteristics and the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia-17 scores were collected after both primary and secondary ACLR. This study is a within-subjects design. Paired t tests were used to compare Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia-17 scores between the primary and secondary ACLR.

Results: Sixteen participants (male = 10, female = 6; height = 172.2 [11.5] cm, weight = 72.2 [20.9] kg) met inclusion criteria for the present study. Participants were 18.2 (3.0) years old and 5.6 (1.0) months since surgery after primary ACLR and 19.0 (1.0) years old and 5.9 (1.0) months since surgery after secondary ACLR. The average score for Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia-17 was not different (P = .77) after the primary (32.7 [5.0]) and secondary ACLR (33.1 [5.2]).

Conclusion: There were no significant differences in kinesiophobia levels in individuals after their primary and secondary ACLR. Although nonsignificant, there is lack of resolution of kinesiophobia between primary and secondary ACLR.

初次与二次前交叉韧带重建后恢复期间的运动恐惧症水平会发生变化吗?
背景:30%的运动员在恢复运动后继续维持继发性前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤。那些继续遭受二次伤害的人在重返运动时有更大的运动恐惧症水平;然而,这些关系主要在初次ACL重建(ACLR)后的患者中观察到。本研究的目的是比较原发性和继发性ACLR发生4 - 8个月后运动恐惧症的差异。方法:这是一项正在进行的护理点研究的二次分析。为了创建我们的分析样本,我们在研究方案中确定了年龄在14至35岁之间的参与者,他们提供了原发性和继发性ACLR后的数据,ACLR后4至8个月的状态,并且报告在原发性或继发性ACLR时没有伴有明显延迟其康复方案的外科手术(例如半月板修复)。在初次和二次ACLR后收集人口统计学和参与者特征以及坦帕运动恐惧症量表-17评分。本研究为受试者内设计。采用配对t检验比较原发性和继发性ACLR的坦帕运动恐惧症量表-17评分。结果:16例受试者(男10例,女6例;身高= 172.2 [11.5]cm,体重= 72.2 [20.9]kg)符合本研究的纳入标准。参与者为原发性ACLR术后18.2(3.0)岁5.6(1.0)个月,继发性ACLR术后19.0(1.0)岁5.9(1.0)个月。首次ACLR(32.7[5.0])和二次ACLR(33.1[5.2])后,运动恐惧症-17坦帕量表的平均得分无显著差异(P = 0.77)。结论:原发性和继发性ACLR后个体运动恐惧症水平无显著差异。虽然不显著,但原发性和继发性ACLR之间缺乏运动恐惧症的解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Sport Rehabilitation
Journal of Sport Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
143
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sport Rehabilitation (JSR) is your source for the latest peer-reviewed research in the field of sport rehabilitation. All members of the sports-medicine team will benefit from the wealth of important information in each issue. JSR is completely devoted to the rehabilitation of sport and exercise injuries, regardless of the age, gender, sport ability, level of fitness, or health status of the participant. JSR publishes peer-reviewed original research, systematic reviews/meta-analyses, critically appraised topics (CATs), case studies/series, and technical reports that directly affect the management and rehabilitation of injuries incurred during sport-related activities, irrespective of the individual’s age, gender, sport ability, level of fitness, or health status. The journal is intended to provide an international, multidisciplinary forum to serve the needs of all members of the sports medicine team, including athletic trainers/therapists, sport physical therapists/physiotherapists, sports medicine physicians, and other health care and medical professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信