Megna Mishra, Louise Thoma, Deidra Charity, Xavier D Thompson, Joe M Hart, Shelby Baez
{"title":"Do Kinesiophobia Levels During Recovery Change After Primary Versus Secondary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction?","authors":"Megna Mishra, Louise Thoma, Deidra Charity, Xavier D Thompson, Joe M Hart, Shelby Baez","doi":"10.1123/jsr.2024-0393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Thirty percent of athletes go on to sustain a secondary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury after return to sport. Those that went on to suffer a secondary injury had greater kinesiophobia levels at time of return to sport; however, these relationships have primarily been observed in patients after primary ACL reconstruction (ACLR). The purpose of this study is to compare differences in kinesiophobia 4 to 8 months after an individual's primary versus secondary ACLR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a secondary analysis of an ongoing point of care study. To create our analytic sample, we identified participants between the ages of 14 and 35 years in the study protocol who provided data after primary and secondary ACLR, were 4 to 8 months status post-ACLR, and reported no concomitant surgical procedures at the time of primary or secondary ACLR that significantly delayed their rehabilitation protocol (e.g., meniscal repair). Demographic and participant characteristics and the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia-17 scores were collected after both primary and secondary ACLR. This study is a within-subjects design. Paired t tests were used to compare Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia-17 scores between the primary and secondary ACLR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen participants (male = 10, female = 6; height = 172.2 [11.5] cm, weight = 72.2 [20.9] kg) met inclusion criteria for the present study. Participants were 18.2 (3.0) years old and 5.6 (1.0) months since surgery after primary ACLR and 19.0 (1.0) years old and 5.9 (1.0) months since surgery after secondary ACLR. The average score for Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia-17 was not different (P = .77) after the primary (32.7 [5.0]) and secondary ACLR (33.1 [5.2]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There were no significant differences in kinesiophobia levels in individuals after their primary and secondary ACLR. Although nonsignificant, there is lack of resolution of kinesiophobia between primary and secondary ACLR.</p>","PeriodicalId":50041,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sport Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sport Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2024-0393","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Context: Thirty percent of athletes go on to sustain a secondary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury after return to sport. Those that went on to suffer a secondary injury had greater kinesiophobia levels at time of return to sport; however, these relationships have primarily been observed in patients after primary ACL reconstruction (ACLR). The purpose of this study is to compare differences in kinesiophobia 4 to 8 months after an individual's primary versus secondary ACLR.
Methods: This is a secondary analysis of an ongoing point of care study. To create our analytic sample, we identified participants between the ages of 14 and 35 years in the study protocol who provided data after primary and secondary ACLR, were 4 to 8 months status post-ACLR, and reported no concomitant surgical procedures at the time of primary or secondary ACLR that significantly delayed their rehabilitation protocol (e.g., meniscal repair). Demographic and participant characteristics and the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia-17 scores were collected after both primary and secondary ACLR. This study is a within-subjects design. Paired t tests were used to compare Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia-17 scores between the primary and secondary ACLR.
Results: Sixteen participants (male = 10, female = 6; height = 172.2 [11.5] cm, weight = 72.2 [20.9] kg) met inclusion criteria for the present study. Participants were 18.2 (3.0) years old and 5.6 (1.0) months since surgery after primary ACLR and 19.0 (1.0) years old and 5.9 (1.0) months since surgery after secondary ACLR. The average score for Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia-17 was not different (P = .77) after the primary (32.7 [5.0]) and secondary ACLR (33.1 [5.2]).
Conclusion: There were no significant differences in kinesiophobia levels in individuals after their primary and secondary ACLR. Although nonsignificant, there is lack of resolution of kinesiophobia between primary and secondary ACLR.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Sport Rehabilitation (JSR) is your source for the latest peer-reviewed research in the field of sport rehabilitation. All members of the sports-medicine team will benefit from the wealth of important information in each issue. JSR is completely devoted to the rehabilitation of sport and exercise injuries, regardless of the age, gender, sport ability, level of fitness, or health status of the participant.
JSR publishes peer-reviewed original research, systematic reviews/meta-analyses, critically appraised topics (CATs), case studies/series, and technical reports that directly affect the management and rehabilitation of injuries incurred during sport-related activities, irrespective of the individual’s age, gender, sport ability, level of fitness, or health status. The journal is intended to provide an international, multidisciplinary forum to serve the needs of all members of the sports medicine team, including athletic trainers/therapists, sport physical therapists/physiotherapists, sports medicine physicians, and other health care and medical professionals.