The impact of online ordering on food security in a food pantry system in New York City.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Pasquale Rummo, Stella Yi, Carla Seet, Leah Strahs, Justin Kong, Dickran Jebejian, Brian Elbel
{"title":"The impact of online ordering on food security in a food pantry system in New York City.","authors":"Pasquale Rummo, Stella Yi, Carla Seet, Leah Strahs, Justin Kong, Dickran Jebejian, Brian Elbel","doi":"10.1093/tbm/ibaf031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Online ordering in food pantries may support food security among adults with low socioeconomic status.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Determine the impact of a transition from in-person ordering to online ordering on the food security status of food pantry clients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For this quasi-experimental study, we recruited participants from Met Council's Kosher Food Network in New York City, including one pantry in Staten Island (intervention) and three pantries in the Bronx, Queens, and Brooklyn (comparison). The final sample included 114 and 90 adults in the intervention and comparison groups, respectively, at baseline (April-July 2023); and 77 and 58 adults in those groups during follow-up (October-December 2023). Using a six-item survey, we assessed food security status, where scores range from zero to six points and higher points indicate lower food security. Secondary outcomes included nutrition security status, fruit and vegetable intake, and pantry wait time. We used a difference-in-differences approach to assess differences in outcomes between conditions, including testing for differences by age (18-64 vs. ≥65 years).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Food security scores decreased in the intervention and comparison groups over time, with no difference in the decrease between groups (P = .87). Yet, among younger adults in the intervention group, wait time decreased during follow-up, and increased in the comparison group (difference-in-differences = -12.1 minutes (95% CI: -21.9, -2.4); P = .02). We did not observe similar differences among older adults (P = .83), nor significant changes in other outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The transition to online ordering did not influence food security status among food pantry clients but may help to save time, especially among younger adults.</p><p><strong>Clinical trials registration: </strong>NCT05752721.</p>","PeriodicalId":48679,"journal":{"name":"Translational Behavioral Medicine","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12204695/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibaf031","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Online ordering in food pantries may support food security among adults with low socioeconomic status.

Purpose: Determine the impact of a transition from in-person ordering to online ordering on the food security status of food pantry clients.

Methods: For this quasi-experimental study, we recruited participants from Met Council's Kosher Food Network in New York City, including one pantry in Staten Island (intervention) and three pantries in the Bronx, Queens, and Brooklyn (comparison). The final sample included 114 and 90 adults in the intervention and comparison groups, respectively, at baseline (April-July 2023); and 77 and 58 adults in those groups during follow-up (October-December 2023). Using a six-item survey, we assessed food security status, where scores range from zero to six points and higher points indicate lower food security. Secondary outcomes included nutrition security status, fruit and vegetable intake, and pantry wait time. We used a difference-in-differences approach to assess differences in outcomes between conditions, including testing for differences by age (18-64 vs. ≥65 years).

Results: Food security scores decreased in the intervention and comparison groups over time, with no difference in the decrease between groups (P = .87). Yet, among younger adults in the intervention group, wait time decreased during follow-up, and increased in the comparison group (difference-in-differences = -12.1 minutes (95% CI: -21.9, -2.4); P = .02). We did not observe similar differences among older adults (P = .83), nor significant changes in other outcomes.

Conclusions: The transition to online ordering did not influence food security status among food pantry clients but may help to save time, especially among younger adults.

Clinical trials registration: NCT05752721.

在线订购对纽约市食品储藏室系统食品安全的影响。
背景:食品储藏室的网上订购可以支持低社会经济地位的成年人的食品安全。目的:确定从亲自订购到在线订购对食品储藏室客户食品安全状况的影响。方法:在这个准实验研究中,我们从纽约市大都会理事会的犹太食品网络中招募了参与者,包括史坦顿岛的一家食品储藏室(干预)和布朗克斯、皇后区和布鲁克林的三家食品储藏室(比较)。最终样本包括基线时(2023年4月至7月)干预组和对照组的114名和90名成年人;在随访期间(2023年10月至12月),这些组分别有77和58名成年人。通过一项六项调查,我们评估了粮食安全状况,得分范围从0到6分,分数越高表明粮食安全状况越差。次要结果包括营养安全状况、水果和蔬菜摄入量以及食品储藏室等待时间。我们采用差异中的差异方法来评估不同情况下结果的差异,包括年龄差异测试(18-64岁vs.≥65岁)。结果:随着时间的推移,干预组和对照组的食品安全评分均有所下降,组间的下降无差异(P = 0.87)。然而,在干预组的年轻人中,随访期间的等待时间减少,而对照组的等待时间增加(差异中的差异= -12.1分钟(95% CI: -21.9, -2.4);P = .02)。我们在老年人中没有观察到类似的差异(P = 0.83),其他结局也没有显著变化。结论:向网上订购的过渡不会影响食品储藏室客户的食品安全状况,但可能有助于节省时间,特别是在年轻人中。临床试验注册:NCT05752721。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Translational Behavioral Medicine
Translational Behavioral Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: Translational Behavioral Medicine publishes content that engages, informs, and catalyzes dialogue about behavioral medicine among the research, practice, and policy communities. TBM began receiving an Impact Factor in 2015 and currently holds an Impact Factor of 2.989. TBM is one of two journals published by the Society of Behavioral Medicine. The Society of Behavioral Medicine is a multidisciplinary organization of clinicians, educators, and scientists dedicated to promoting the study of the interactions of behavior with biology and the environment, and then applying that knowledge to improve the health and well-being of individuals, families, communities, and populations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信