Förderung der evidenzbasierten Praxis durch die Implementierung eines Journal Clubs im Setting eines Universitätsklinikums

IF 1.7 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Annalena Paus , Isabelle Stickdorn
{"title":"Förderung der evidenzbasierten Praxis durch die Implementierung eines Journal Clubs im Setting eines Universitätsklinikums","authors":"Annalena Paus ,&nbsp;Isabelle Stickdorn","doi":"10.1016/j.zefq.2025.05.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>A lack of structural-organisational and methodological skills can be a reason why evidence-based methods are not applied by healthcare practitioners. A Journal Club (JC) can be a suitable forum to strengthen the critical exchange of scientific findings in practice and thus promote evidence-based practice. The aim of this practical project was to implement and evaluate a JC in an interprofessional department for therapeutic health professions at a university hospital.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Based on a literature review and expert discussions, a guideline for the implementation of a JC was developed. This guideline was used to set up a JC for therapeutic healthcare professions at a university hospital. To evaluate the JC, written feedback forms were handed out to the participants after each JC.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Ten JCs were conducted between March 2023 and January 2025 and attended by an average of 43 participants. 278 feedback forms from JC participants were analysed. Overall satisfaction with the JC was rated at an average of 8.6 on a rating scale of 0–10 (0 = lowest satisfaction, 10 = highest satisfaction). 92.0% of participants agreed or strongly agreed with the statement that a JC offers a suitable forum to strengthen evidence-based practice. 37.2% of participants stated that since they started attending the JC, they have more frequently incorporated study results into their therapeutic decision-making.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The results show that a JC can be a promising platform for strengthening evidence-based work in everyday therapeutic practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46628,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen","volume":"196 ","pages":"Pages 22-28"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S186592172500145X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

A lack of structural-organisational and methodological skills can be a reason why evidence-based methods are not applied by healthcare practitioners. A Journal Club (JC) can be a suitable forum to strengthen the critical exchange of scientific findings in practice and thus promote evidence-based practice. The aim of this practical project was to implement and evaluate a JC in an interprofessional department for therapeutic health professions at a university hospital.

Methods

Based on a literature review and expert discussions, a guideline for the implementation of a JC was developed. This guideline was used to set up a JC for therapeutic healthcare professions at a university hospital. To evaluate the JC, written feedback forms were handed out to the participants after each JC.

Results

Ten JCs were conducted between March 2023 and January 2025 and attended by an average of 43 participants. 278 feedback forms from JC participants were analysed. Overall satisfaction with the JC was rated at an average of 8.6 on a rating scale of 0–10 (0 = lowest satisfaction, 10 = highest satisfaction). 92.0% of participants agreed or strongly agreed with the statement that a JC offers a suitable forum to strengthen evidence-based practice. 37.2% of participants stated that since they started attending the JC, they have more frequently incorporated study results into their therapeutic decision-making.

Conclusion

The results show that a JC can be a promising platform for strengthening evidence-based work in everyday therapeutic practice.
[通过在大学医院环境中实施期刊俱乐部促进循证实践]。
缺乏结构组织和方法学技能可能是医疗保健从业者不应用循证方法的原因。期刊俱乐部(JC)可以成为一个合适的论坛,在实践中加强科学发现的批判性交流,从而促进循证实践。这个实际项目的目的是在一所大学医院的治疗卫生专业跨专业部门实施和评估一个JC。方法:在文献回顾和专家讨论的基础上,制定了一个JC的实施指南。该指南被用于建立大学医院治疗保健专业的JC。为了评估JC,书面反馈表格在每个JC之后分发给参与者。结果:在2023年3月至2025年1月期间进行了10次JCs,平均有43名参与者参加。分析了JC参与者的278份反馈表格。对JC的总体满意度平均为8.6分(0 -10分)(0 = 最低满意度,10 = 最高满意度)。92.0%的与会者同意或强烈同意JC为加强循证实践提供了合适的论坛。37.2%的参与者表示,自从他们开始参加JC以来,他们更频繁地将研究结果纳入他们的治疗决策。结论:临床综合诊疗是加强临床实践循证工作的良好平台。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
18.20%
发文量
129
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信