Focused cardiac ultrasound conducted by neurologists in patients with stroke: A validation study.

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jorge Pagola, Piergiorgio Lochner, Radim Licenik, Giulio Maria Fiore, Felipe A Montellano, Victor Gonzalez, Valérie Pavlicek, Juan Alvarez-Cienfuegos, Sergio Moral, Roberto Muñoz Arrondo, Alberto Vera, Angel Ruiz, Jesús González Mirelis, Jorge Rodríguez-Pardo, Esther Pérez-David, Juan Manuel García-Sánchez, Lara Ruiz Gómez, Laura Amaya Pascasio, Elvira Carrión Ríos, Tania Rodriguez-Ares, Charigan Abou, María Payá, Laura Guerra, Ana de Arce, Ainhoa Benegas Arostegui, Muhammad Khaled Hasan, Vlatka Reskovic
{"title":"Focused cardiac ultrasound conducted by neurologists in patients with stroke: A validation study.","authors":"Jorge Pagola, Piergiorgio Lochner, Radim Licenik, Giulio Maria Fiore, Felipe A Montellano, Victor Gonzalez, Valérie Pavlicek, Juan Alvarez-Cienfuegos, Sergio Moral, Roberto Muñoz Arrondo, Alberto Vera, Angel Ruiz, Jesús González Mirelis, Jorge Rodríguez-Pardo, Esther Pérez-David, Juan Manuel García-Sánchez, Lara Ruiz Gómez, Laura Amaya Pascasio, Elvira Carrión Ríos, Tania Rodriguez-Ares, Charigan Abou, María Payá, Laura Guerra, Ana de Arce, Ainhoa Benegas Arostegui, Muhammad Khaled Hasan, Vlatka Reskovic","doi":"10.1177/23969873251345374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) has a high diagnostic yield and a rapid theoretical learning curve. FoCUS can be applied in stroke assessments performed by stroke neurologists when a cardioembolic stroke is suspected.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>An international multicenter, prospective validation study was conducted to assess neurologists' ability to perform FoCUS. The FoCUS examination was defined as a simplified 2D transthoracic echocardiography. Neurologists and cardiologists performed the FoCUS independently and blinded. A twenty-question test evaluated neurologists' ability to recognize sources of cardioembolic stroke from recorded FoCUS studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 432 paired studies involving 216 patients were conducted across 11 centers. No significant differences were found between neurologists and cardiologists in detecting: Left Ventricle (LV) dysfunction (7.4% vs 7.9%, <i>p</i> = 0.834), LV dilation (2.8% vs 2.3%, <i>p</i> = 0.766), VC collapsibility (7.2% vs 9.1%, <i>p</i> = 0.501), Right Ventricle dysfunction (0.9% vs 0.9%, <i>p</i> = 0.999), and pericardial effusion (0.5% vs 1.9%, <i>p</i> = 0.212). Cohen Kappa showed substantial agreement for LV dysfunction (0.640), moderate for LV dilation (0.589), and fair for VC collapsibility (0.226). Neurologists demonstrated 93.82% sensitivity and 92.92% specificity for detecting embolic sources. Success rate for LV akinesia was 88% (16/18), LV dysfunction 83% (15/18), complex aortic plaque 88% (16/18), and mitral stenosis 55% (10/18).</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>Properly trained neurologists can reliably perform FoCUS, particularly for assessing LV function and dilation, with better results in patients with favorable echocardiographic windows. While VC assessment requires further training, neurologists demonstrated high accuracy in identifying cardioembolic sources (over 90% of cases correctly identified). This study supports implementing standardized FoCUS training for neurologists through collaboration with cardiology specialists to enhance stroke diagnostics and management.</p>","PeriodicalId":46821,"journal":{"name":"European Stroke Journal","volume":" ","pages":"23969873251345374"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12181179/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Stroke Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23969873251345374","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) has a high diagnostic yield and a rapid theoretical learning curve. FoCUS can be applied in stroke assessments performed by stroke neurologists when a cardioembolic stroke is suspected.

Patients and methods: An international multicenter, prospective validation study was conducted to assess neurologists' ability to perform FoCUS. The FoCUS examination was defined as a simplified 2D transthoracic echocardiography. Neurologists and cardiologists performed the FoCUS independently and blinded. A twenty-question test evaluated neurologists' ability to recognize sources of cardioembolic stroke from recorded FoCUS studies.

Results: A total of 432 paired studies involving 216 patients were conducted across 11 centers. No significant differences were found between neurologists and cardiologists in detecting: Left Ventricle (LV) dysfunction (7.4% vs 7.9%, p = 0.834), LV dilation (2.8% vs 2.3%, p = 0.766), VC collapsibility (7.2% vs 9.1%, p = 0.501), Right Ventricle dysfunction (0.9% vs 0.9%, p = 0.999), and pericardial effusion (0.5% vs 1.9%, p = 0.212). Cohen Kappa showed substantial agreement for LV dysfunction (0.640), moderate for LV dilation (0.589), and fair for VC collapsibility (0.226). Neurologists demonstrated 93.82% sensitivity and 92.92% specificity for detecting embolic sources. Success rate for LV akinesia was 88% (16/18), LV dysfunction 83% (15/18), complex aortic plaque 88% (16/18), and mitral stenosis 55% (10/18).

Discussion and conclusion: Properly trained neurologists can reliably perform FoCUS, particularly for assessing LV function and dilation, with better results in patients with favorable echocardiographic windows. While VC assessment requires further training, neurologists demonstrated high accuracy in identifying cardioembolic sources (over 90% of cases correctly identified). This study supports implementing standardized FoCUS training for neurologists through collaboration with cardiology specialists to enhance stroke diagnostics and management.

神经学家对中风患者进行的集中心脏超声:一项验证研究。
聚焦心脏超声(FoCUS)具有高诊断率和快速的理论学习曲线。当怀疑心脏栓塞性中风时,中风神经科医师可将焦点应用于中风评估。患者和方法:进行了一项国际多中心前瞻性验证研究,以评估神经科医生执行FoCUS的能力。FoCUS检查被定义为简化的二维经胸超声心动图。神经学家和心脏病学家独立、盲法进行FoCUS试验。一项包含20个问题的测试评估了神经科医生从记录的FoCUS研究中识别心脏栓塞性中风来源的能力。结果:11个中心共进行了432项配对研究,涉及216名患者。在左心室功能障碍(7.4% vs 7.9%, p = 0.834)、左室舒张(2.8% vs 2.3%, p = 0.766)、左室湿陷性(7.2% vs 9.1%, p = 0.501)、右心室功能障碍(0.9% vs 0.9%, p = 0.999)、心包积液(0.5% vs 1.9%, p = 0.212)的检测上,神经科医师与心内科医师无显著差异。Cohen Kappa对左室功能障碍的诊断结果一致(0.640),对左室扩张的诊断结果一致(0.589),对左室坍缩的诊断结果一致(0.226)。神经学家对栓塞源的检测灵敏度为93.82%,特异性为92.92%。左室运动障碍成功率88%(16/18),左室功能障碍成功率83%(15/18),复杂主动脉斑块成功率88%(16/18),二尖瓣狭窄成功率55%(10/18)。讨论与结论:经过适当训练的神经科医生可以可靠地执行FoCUS,特别是评估左室功能和扩张,在超声心动图窗口有利的患者中效果更好。虽然VC评估需要进一步的培训,但神经科医生在识别心脏栓塞源方面表现出很高的准确性(超过90%的病例被正确识别)。这项研究支持通过与心脏病专家合作,对神经科医生实施标准化的焦点培训,以提高中风的诊断和管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
6.60%
发文量
102
期刊介绍: Launched in 2016 the European Stroke Journal (ESJ) is the official journal of the European Stroke Organisation (ESO), a professional non-profit organization with over 1,400 individual members, and affiliations to numerous related national and international societies. ESJ covers clinical stroke research from all fields, including clinical trials, epidemiology, primary and secondary prevention, diagnosis, acute and post-acute management, guidelines, translation of experimental findings into clinical practice, rehabilitation, organisation of stroke care, and societal impact. It is open to authors from all relevant medical and health professions. Article types include review articles, original research, protocols, guidelines, editorials and letters to the Editor. Through ESJ, authors and researchers have gained a new platform for the rapid and professional publication of peer reviewed scientific material of the highest standards; publication in ESJ is highly competitive. The journal and its editorial team has developed excellent cooperation with sister organisations such as the World Stroke Organisation and the International Journal of Stroke, and the American Heart Organization/American Stroke Association and the journal Stroke. ESJ is fully peer-reviewed and is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Issues are published 4 times a year (March, June, September and December) and articles are published OnlineFirst prior to issue publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信